Jonathan H. Adler
banner
jadler1969.bsky.social
Jonathan H. Adler
@jadler1969.bsky.social

Father, Husband, W&M LawProf, guy with opinions; @chkbal co-founder;
@volokhc.bsky.social contributor;
Law before policy before politics;
Philly sports always;
'the cowbell of Twitter'-N. Schulz
typos are part of the brand. .. more

Jonathan H. Adler is a conservative American legal commentator and law professor at William & Mary Law School. He has been recognized as one of the most cited professors in the field of environmental law. His research is also credited with inspiring litigation that challenged the Obama Administration's implementation of the Affordable Care Act, resulting in the Supreme Court's decision in King v. Burwell. .. more

Economics 28%
Law 23%

If it "isn't a thing," can you explain all the current litigation, including the recent $2 million judgment in a case involving a 16 year old?

I just have a little, demanding one.

One to Alito.

*skim
(Remember, typos are part of the brand.)

I never left. I just dont get much meaningful engagement over here, and time is in short supply. (It's the one truly non-renewable resource!)

Reposted by Henry Farrell

Based on my initial skin, the endangerment finding repeal faces many of the challenges I identified in this column:
www.civitasinstitute.org/research/the...
EPA's strategy is aggressive and legally risky.
The Dangers of Pursuing the Endangerment Finding | Jonathan H. Adler
EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin’s most ambitious undertaking may also be the most legally vulnerable.
www.civitasinstitute.org

I also think its worth looking at which judges place clerks on SCOTUS, and with Alito in particular.

He's one.

Oldham clerked for Alito. OTOH, not a feeder judge.

Your sources are better than Stern's (though it omits some dark horses).

Is that a critique?

Reposted by Jonathan H. Adler

Pointing out antisemitism on the left is one of the most annoying experiences one can have on Bluesky, not only do you get actual antisemites in your replies but also other leftists who are reflexively defensive and who bristle at the slightest critique.

Nothing says "this is a serious matter" more than issuing an order on February 31st.

Reposted by Jonathan H. Adler

BREAKING: Judge Katherine Menendez denies Minnesota, Minneapolis, and St. Paul’s request for a TRO or preliminary injunction blocking the Trump administration’s Operation Metro Surge on Tenth Amendment grounds.

Background at Law Dork: www.lawdork.com/p/challengin...
Apart from anything else there are no penguins in Greenland. Unless he’s invading the South Pole too….

Reposted by Jonathan H. Adler

BIG IN THE 4A WORLD: The Supreme Court has granted cert in Chatrie, the geofence warrant case, to decide the following Q: "Whether the execution of the geofence warrant violated the Fourth Amendment." (I assume this includes both whether a "search" happened and whether the warrant was lawful.)

Reposted by Jonathan H. Adler

Reposted by Scott A. Imberman

Perhaps I'm old-fashioned, but when a govt agent kills someone, I don't think gov't officials should make public statements about the lawfulness or justification of the killing prior to an actual investigation.

Reposted by Jonathan H. Adler

NEW: The Supreme Court grants review in several new cases.

These (and likely next week’s grants) will be heard this term. Grants after that, unless expedited, will be heard sometime in the term that starts in October 2026.

What could go wrong?

Worthwhile thread
Pretty sure I'm one of the folks Mark's subtweeting. While I don’t feel compelled to respond, this actually provides a beautiful lesson for how academics and other serious observers might think about engaging with the Court and law. (thread)
There's a rising faction of the legal academy that stays quiet when their MAGAdemic colleagues produce fraudulent psuedo-scholarship in service to the cruelest aspects of Trump's agenda ... then leap in to police the discourse when their progressive colleagues criticize those MAGAdemics too bluntly.

Reposted by Jonathan H. Adler

NEW: An ICE officer killed a person in broad daylight in Minneapolis today — with posted video appearing to contradict the DHS statement claiming self-defense, as the driver appeared to be attempting to drive away when shot.

MPR: www.mprnews.org/story/2026/0...

Video: bsky.app/profile/dani...
Pretty sure I'm one of the folks Mark's subtweeting. While I don’t feel compelled to respond, this actually provides a beautiful lesson for how academics and other serious observers might think about engaging with the Court and law. (thread)
There's a rising faction of the legal academy that stays quiet when their MAGAdemic colleagues produce fraudulent psuedo-scholarship in service to the cruelest aspects of Trump's agenda ... then leap in to police the discourse when their progressive colleagues criticize those MAGAdemics too bluntly.

I've written up some of my concerns with the study.
reason.com/volokh/2026/...
Does the Supreme Court Favor the Rich?
Today's New York Times reports on a new study by three economists purporting to show that the Supreme Court's decisions are…
reason.com

Just when you think RFK cant be any worse . . .

Reposted by Jonathan H. Adler

The wildfire disaster caused billions in losses, and many homeowners are still waiting for insurance payouts and permits to rebuild. on.wsj.com/3Z2Xs84
A Year After Fires, L.A.’s Rocky Recovery Is Shaped by Wealth, Insurance and Red Tape
The wildfire disaster caused billions in losses, and many homeowners are still waiting for insurance payouts and permits to rebuild.
on.wsj.com