@swimmyelin.bsky.social
Reposted
A federal officer cannot be “doxxed.” The public has a right to know who is operating in our government, especially if they have the power to imprison someone.
Acting ICE Director Todd Lyons: "If you look before January 20, and even after January 20, the men & women of ICE did not have to have masks on their face. Me personally, I don't want those officers having to wear masks bc it's hot, it's dangerous. But ICE agents are being doxxed at a horrible rate"
June 23, 2025 at 2:41 PM
A federal officer cannot be “doxxed.” The public has a right to know who is operating in our government, especially if they have the power to imprison someone.
Hey, so my Insta and Threads accounts have both been closed with no reason given and I can’t even log in to file an appeal. Fuck that shit Zuck 🤬
June 24, 2025 at 6:41 AM
Hey, so my Insta and Threads accounts have both been closed with no reason given and I can’t even log in to file an appeal. Fuck that shit Zuck 🤬
Best Star Trek crew, wrong answers only.
May 25, 2025 at 6:35 AM
Best Star Trek crew, wrong answers only.
Reposted
transphobes: "we should reduce your numbers, take away your rights, legally define you out of existence."
trans people: "fuck you."
media: "trans row erupts, gender-critical campaigners speak of how 'abuse' by trans activists is silencing their voices in debate."
trans people: "fuck you."
media: "trans row erupts, gender-critical campaigners speak of how 'abuse' by trans activists is silencing their voices in debate."
May 17, 2025 at 10:42 AM
transphobes: "we should reduce your numbers, take away your rights, legally define you out of existence."
trans people: "fuck you."
media: "trans row erupts, gender-critical campaigners speak of how 'abuse' by trans activists is silencing their voices in debate."
trans people: "fuck you."
media: "trans row erupts, gender-critical campaigners speak of how 'abuse' by trans activists is silencing their voices in debate."
Reposted
I don't think that was the thing people were concerned about? Like... of course the show itself isn't going to have Harry look to camera and say something transphobic. The problem is that she's profiting from this.
An HBO executive has promised fans of the Harry Potter franchise that the upcoming reboot television series will not be “infused” with J.K. Rowling’s anti-trans beliefs.
HBO Exec Promises 'Harry Potter' Series 'Not Secretly Being Infused' With J.K. Rowling's Anti-Trans Rhetoric
An HBO exec has promised fans of the Harry Potter franchise that the upcoming TV series will not be "infused" with J.K. Rowling’s anti-trans beliefs.
rollingstone.com
May 2, 2025 at 8:08 PM
I don't think that was the thing people were concerned about? Like... of course the show itself isn't going to have Harry look to camera and say something transphobic. The problem is that she's profiting from this.
Reposted
You deserve so much better than that mid wizard book shit.
And so do trans people.
And so do trans people.
May 1, 2025 at 3:55 PM
You deserve so much better than that mid wizard book shit.
And so do trans people.
And so do trans people.
Reposted
Nebraska Republicans announce a new anti-trans bathroom ban and in the press conference, confirm this is explicitly religiously motivated.
"The idea of separation of church and legislature is one of the things that really pisses me off."
"The idea of separation of church and legislature is one of the things that really pisses me off."
January 11, 2025 at 2:37 AM
Nebraska Republicans announce a new anti-trans bathroom ban and in the press conference, confirm this is explicitly religiously motivated.
"The idea of separation of church and legislature is one of the things that really pisses me off."
"The idea of separation of church and legislature is one of the things that really pisses me off."
Reposted
Referring to LGBT+ people as "mentally ill" or "abnormal" is not "a discussion."
It's not "an opinion."
It's not "free speech."
It's not "debate."
It's hatemongering, with the clear and obvious intent to mark a minority out for subjugation, torture and violence.
It's not "an opinion."
It's not "free speech."
It's not "debate."
It's hatemongering, with the clear and obvious intent to mark a minority out for subjugation, torture and violence.
January 10, 2025 at 12:56 PM
Referring to LGBT+ people as "mentally ill" or "abnormal" is not "a discussion."
It's not "an opinion."
It's not "free speech."
It's not "debate."
It's hatemongering, with the clear and obvious intent to mark a minority out for subjugation, torture and violence.
It's not "an opinion."
It's not "free speech."
It's not "debate."
It's hatemongering, with the clear and obvious intent to mark a minority out for subjugation, torture and violence.
Reposted
A thing I wanted to vent about - I wrote up a whole blog today about the whole grooming gangs nonsense and Jenrick's use of "medieval attitudes towards women" and how stupid it all is...
January 8, 2025 at 7:30 PM
A thing I wanted to vent about - I wrote up a whole blog today about the whole grooming gangs nonsense and Jenrick's use of "medieval attitudes towards women" and how stupid it all is...
Well, I’m here. Let’s see if I stick around…
August 8, 2024 at 7:59 PM
Well, I’m here. Let’s see if I stick around…