Soulheim
@soulheim.bsky.social
Reposted by Soulheim
simple point i tried to convey in the post I just shared. if someone does a nazi salute at a political rally, i don't need to do a critical biography or do some deep dive on why they did it. if you want a research project, sure, whatever. but that doesn't matter. They did it. Thats all that matters.
January 20, 2025 at 9:50 PM
simple point i tried to convey in the post I just shared. if someone does a nazi salute at a political rally, i don't need to do a critical biography or do some deep dive on why they did it. if you want a research project, sure, whatever. but that doesn't matter. They did it. Thats all that matters.
Reposted by Soulheim
TLDR: There is nothing enforceable for the immediate future. It will take months or years to implement this via rulemaking or bureaucratic changes which are then subject to legal challenge. While it's worrying, there's no immediate change yet for most trans people. Do not comply in advance.
Trump White House's first trans executive order is out. I'll be reading over it here and going through line by line to help you make sense of it.
You can find it here:
www.whitehouse.gov/presidential...
You can find it here:
www.whitehouse.gov/presidential...
DEFENDING WOMEN FROM GENDER IDEOLOGY EXTREMISM AND RESTORING BIOLOGICAL TRUTH TO THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT – The White House
By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including section 7301 of title 5, United
www.whitehouse.gov
January 21, 2025 at 2:57 AM
TLDR: There is nothing enforceable for the immediate future. It will take months or years to implement this via rulemaking or bureaucratic changes which are then subject to legal challenge. While it's worrying, there's no immediate change yet for most trans people. Do not comply in advance.
Reposted by Soulheim
cis folks, please read this hideous thing. if you didn’t believe it was all one fight before, they snuck in some “fetal personhood” here. we’re in this together.
and remember: if you know a trans person, *no, you don’t.*
*we* get to decide when/if we disclose. don’t put your trans friends at risk.
and remember: if you know a trans person, *no, you don’t.*
*we* get to decide when/if we disclose. don’t put your trans friends at risk.
January 21, 2025 at 3:07 AM
cis folks, please read this hideous thing. if you didn’t believe it was all one fight before, they snuck in some “fetal personhood” here. we’re in this together.
and remember: if you know a trans person, *no, you don’t.*
*we* get to decide when/if we disclose. don’t put your trans friends at risk.
and remember: if you know a trans person, *no, you don’t.*
*we* get to decide when/if we disclose. don’t put your trans friends at risk.
Reposted by Soulheim
OH this is interesting... so the 204 votes for impeachment last night meant that at least 12 PPP (conservative party) members voted to pass it. Afterwards, the PPP was shocked and incensed bc before the vote, they thought only 5 PPP members would vote "yes."
n.news.naver.com/article/025/...
n.news.naver.com/article/025/...
[단독] "탄핵 찬성" 알고보니 "반대"…'한동훈 체제' 무너뜨린 건 친한
윤석열 대통령에 대한 국회의 탄핵소추안 가결 직후인 14일 오후 국민의힘 의원총회는 한동훈 대표에 대한 성토장을 방불케 했다. 공개적으로 탄핵 찬성 의사를 밝혔던 친한동훈(친한)계 일부 인사가 “저는 사실 반대표를
n.news.naver.com
December 16, 2024 at 1:17 AM
OH this is interesting... so the 204 votes for impeachment last night meant that at least 12 PPP (conservative party) members voted to pass it. Afterwards, the PPP was shocked and incensed bc before the vote, they thought only 5 PPP members would vote "yes."
n.news.naver.com/article/025/...
n.news.naver.com/article/025/...
Reposted by Soulheim
Not a media basher generally, but "martial law misstep" is genuinely an insane headline
December 7, 2024 at 1:19 PM
Not a media basher generally, but "martial law misstep" is genuinely an insane headline
Reposted by Soulheim
The father recorded his call.l to preserve his son’s voice, and told him:
“You listen to me. Listen to me. First of all, you need to protect your life. Second, you cannot attack civilians or cause them harm. Not in any circumstance. Ok?”
“You listen to me. Listen to me. First of all, you need to protect your life. Second, you cannot attack civilians or cause them harm. Not in any circumstance. Ok?”
December 6, 2024 at 4:53 PM
The father recorded his call.l to preserve his son’s voice, and told him:
“You listen to me. Listen to me. First of all, you need to protect your life. Second, you cannot attack civilians or cause them harm. Not in any circumstance. Ok?”
“You listen to me. Listen to me. First of all, you need to protect your life. Second, you cannot attack civilians or cause them harm. Not in any circumstance. Ok?”
Reposted by Soulheim
US media would do well to take its cues from Korean news reporters who are actively using the term “insurrection” (내란), as that is the charge under which all the current investigations are falling.
Not a media basher generally, but "martial law misstep" is genuinely an insane headline
December 7, 2024 at 4:57 PM
US media would do well to take its cues from Korean news reporters who are actively using the term “insurrection” (내란), as that is the charge under which all the current investigations are falling.
Reposted by Soulheim
I am not in Korea but my family is and my dad is not taking this seriously as of yet. Mostly bc no one in the country takes him seriously and also his reasoning for martial law is flimsy as tissue paper (the recent budget cut a lot of the government prosecution team’s “special activities budget”)
December 3, 2024 at 2:18 PM
I am not in Korea but my family is and my dad is not taking this seriously as of yet. Mostly bc no one in the country takes him seriously and also his reasoning for martial law is flimsy as tissue paper (the recent budget cut a lot of the government prosecution team’s “special activities budget”)