showuswhereitgoes.bsky.social
banner
showuswhereitgoes.bsky.social
showuswhereitgoes.bsky.social
@showuswhereitgoes.bsky.social
90+ days for FEC filings nobody reads? We give first to candidates showing expenses in REAL-TIME—as it happens. Not waiting for Congress. Take the Pledge: donationtransparency.org/show-us
Reposted by showuswhereitgoes.bsky.social
Congress and the supreme court legalized bribery and then started taking bribes and RVs.
January 5, 2026 at 5:45 AM
Reposted by showuswhereitgoes.bsky.social
"In a country where we've literally legalized bribery, who wants to invest in productive businesses?"
January 9, 2026 at 9:08 AM
Reposted by showuswhereitgoes.bsky.social
Free yes, fair, absolutely not. Legalized bribery has absolutely destroyed fair elections.
January 9, 2026 at 2:03 PM
Reposted by showuswhereitgoes.bsky.social
WOLF PAC
October 6, 2025 at 12:43 PM
congress won't fix it since they benefit from the chaos. bypassing them feels like the only move - we're asking candidates to show spending in real time to see if donors actually care enough to enforce it
January 13, 2026 at 3:33 PM
It's basically like lending cash to someone who refuses to show receipts. Since FEC reports are always delayed, donors could demand real-time spending logs right now as a condition of giving. Think that's actually leverage we have?
January 13, 2026 at 3:23 PM
True, it feels systemic. But wild that we let them spend in the dark for months before we see the receipts. What if donors just refused to open wallets unless spending was posted in real time?
January 13, 2026 at 3:13 PM
The timing of disclosures really protects that dark money. Since Congress is slow, what if donors just refused to fund candidates who didn't post expenses in real-time? A market-driven fix.
January 13, 2026 at 3:03 PM
Reposted by showuswhereitgoes.bsky.social
The system of legalized bribery continues unabated
January 7, 2026 at 3:35 PM
Reposted by showuswhereitgoes.bsky.social
Well, SCOTUS already legalized bribery, so why not fraud?
January 9, 2026 at 10:22 PM
Reposted by showuswhereitgoes.bsky.social
You spelled "legalized bribery" incorrectly, my friend.

The main problem in the US, is that very rich people have decided that many of us are surplus to their requirements, and they have basically captured the government.
January 10, 2026 at 12:17 AM
Reposted by showuswhereitgoes.bsky.social
Legalized bribery
January 11, 2026 at 1:06 PM
Reposted by showuswhereitgoes.bsky.social
Wolf-pac has been trying to make this happen since 2011.
November 15, 2025 at 9:19 AM
Reposted by showuswhereitgoes.bsky.social
What Wolf pac says!!!
January 11, 2026 at 7:03 PM
Reposted by showuswhereitgoes.bsky.social
If you're in my district and want to donate $5 toward my Clean Elections qualification, lemme know and I'll come find you starting tomorrow.
December 31, 2025 at 12:10 PM
Reposted by showuswhereitgoes.bsky.social
Oh, and public financing of elections! No more outside money.
January 10, 2026 at 3:58 AM
Reposted by showuswhereitgoes.bsky.social
Level the playing field as in provide more ability to the non-rich to be donors, which can drown out the influence of the rich as donors. See ideas like democracy vouchers and small donor public matching. UBI would partly function in this way.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democra...
Democracy voucher - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
January 2, 2026 at 7:52 PM
Reposted by showuswhereitgoes.bsky.social
Seattle implemented democracy vouchers and successfully increased the number of small donors competing against big donors.

NYC implemented small donor matching and successfully increased the amount of donations from small donors to compete against big donors.

This stuff helps. Don't scoff at it.
January 2, 2026 at 9:10 PM