I am a physician who sees patients each day. I have past experience in federal government, public health, and biosecurity (the field that deals with global threats to health).
It's a real loss as far as our ability to detect and combat the next pandemic.
It's a real loss as far as our ability to detect and combat the next pandemic.
This is quite bad news for vaccine access. ACIP is the CDC's advisory panel that issues vaccine recommendations. Their recommendations largely determine what vaccines insurance will pay for. Presumably RFK will install only antivaxxers on the panel.
*KENNEDY REMOVING ALL MEMBERS OF CDC PANEL ADVISING ON VACCINES
This is quite bad news for vaccine access. ACIP is the CDC's advisory panel that issues vaccine recommendations. Their recommendations largely determine what vaccines insurance will pay for. Presumably RFK will install only antivaxxers on the panel.
Incompetence? Subtle pushback from the CDC?
Incompetence? Subtle pushback from the CDC?
Vaccine recommendations matter because they dictate what vaccines insurance will cover. It is all part of the multi-pronged assault on vaccines.
Vaccine recommendations matter because they dictate what vaccines insurance will cover. It is all part of the multi-pronged assault on vaccines.
The members have a tough choice: do they recommend that we continue to use our current vaccine, which is not so well matched to current trains, or recommend an updated vaccine that risks rejection by FDA?
This does not mean that JN.1 itself will be the spike in the vaccine- JN.1 lineage includes many subvariants including LP.8.1 etc. VRBPAC is discussing which one would be best now.
The members have a tough choice: do they recommend that we continue to use our current vaccine, which is not so well matched to current trains, or recommend an updated vaccine that risks rejection by FDA?
Moderna published a study suggesting that the vaccine provides superior protection against COVID compared to current vaccines.
A real loss, thanks to the antivaxx ghouls who now run the FDA.
Moderna published a study suggesting that the vaccine provides superior protection against COVID compared to current vaccines.
A real loss, thanks to the antivaxx ghouls who now run the FDA.
-The COVID vaccine remains quite important for people of all ages to receive. COVID infection and reinfection causes cumulative, progressive damage to the body, It causes organ damage, immune dysfunction, and brain injury.
[THREAD]
-The COVID vaccine remains quite important for people of all ages to receive. COVID infection and reinfection causes cumulative, progressive damage to the body, It causes organ damage, immune dysfunction, and brain injury.
[THREAD]
Their plan will make it difficult for people to receive COVID shots if they are under the age of 65.
Their plan will make it difficult for people to receive COVID shots if they are under the age of 65.
By comparison, the WHO says it is OK to keep vaccines as is.
I agree with the EMA's recommendations here.
By comparison, the WHO says it is OK to keep vaccines as is.
I agree with the EMA's recommendations here.
It is now FDA approved for 65+ y/o, and for 12 - 64 y/o "who have at least one underlying condition
that puts them at high risk for severe outcomes from COVID-19."
It is now FDA approved for 65+ y/o, and for 12 - 64 y/o "who have at least one underlying condition
that puts them at high risk for severe outcomes from COVID-19."
-Currently, Pfizer and Moderna are FDA approved for those 12 years old and up.
-Pediatric versions of Pfizer and Moderna are only available via emergency use authorization. [...]
-Currently, Pfizer and Moderna are FDA approved for those 12 years old and up.
-Pediatric versions of Pfizer and Moderna are only available via emergency use authorization. [...]
They essentially recommend using the same strains as in 2024-2025.
I interpret this as both good and bad news.
They essentially recommend using the same strains as in 2024-2025.
I interpret this as both good and bad news.
Prasad is a thin-skinned, academically-dishonest sellout who despises public health and vaccines. He also is a jerk.
Now he is in charge of reviewing our vaccines and biologics. God help us.
Prasad is a thin-skinned, academically-dishonest sellout who despises public health and vaccines. He also is a jerk.
Now he is in charge of reviewing our vaccines and biologics. God help us.
By law, RFK can overrule the FDA's decision of whether to approve a new (or updated) vaccine. But that would invite legal challenges and look bad. What if the goal is to make it near-impossible to even apply for approval? ...
By law, RFK can overrule the FDA's decision of whether to approve a new (or updated) vaccine. But that would invite legal challenges and look bad. What if the goal is to make it near-impossible to even apply for approval? ...