people.com/donald-trump...
www.theatlantic.com/politics/arc...
www.pbump.net/o/sincerity-...
Got it.
Got it.
They're not trying to convince discerning, skeptical, fact-based people. They're trying to give supporters a fantasy that validates their feelings and creates a sort of loyalty test, while flaunting the absurdity in everyone else's faces.
They're not trying to convince discerning, skeptical, fact-based people. They're trying to give supporters a fantasy that validates their feelings and creates a sort of loyalty test, while flaunting the absurdity in everyone else's faces.
That a president has no power in the US constitution to do a thing is now being recast as the president having “no explicit power”.
Subtle, devious, dangerous, treacherous shift.
Sad and bad to see NYT adopting this spin on a headline.
That a president has no power in the US constitution to do a thing is now being recast as the president having “no explicit power”.
Subtle, devious, dangerous, treacherous shift.
Sad and bad to see NYT adopting this spin on a headline.