dr. nipple slipple
@nippleslipple.bsky.social
assistant professor of philosophy at the university of southern california. feminist philosophy. she/her. cronch cronch https://www.emilytiltonphilosophy.com/
Reposted by dr. nipple slipple
bsky.app/profile/nipp...
this paper also seems relevant to the discussion, especially the part about the smug "everyone thinks that" tone
this paper also seems relevant to the discussion, especially the part about the smug "everyone thinks that" tone
woo! this weird little paper (‘moorean skepticism’) is now forthcoming :) i argue we should see descartes as a social epistemologist and moore as a particularly pessimistic kind of skeptic.
you can check it out here: philpapers.org/rec/TILMSW
you can check it out here: philpapers.org/rec/TILMSW
Emily C. R. Tilton, Moorean Skepticism - PhilPapers
Moore is a skeptic and Descartes is the ultimate social epistemologist. Jonathan Ichikawa misses this, and as a result he inherits the problems of insularity and exclusion that plague other Moorean .....
philpapers.org
October 24, 2025 at 12:45 PM
bsky.app/profile/nipp...
this paper also seems relevant to the discussion, especially the part about the smug "everyone thinks that" tone
this paper also seems relevant to the discussion, especially the part about the smug "everyone thinks that" tone
mostly, though, this paper is a response to @jichikawa.bsky.social’s book epistemic courage. i argue that epistemic courage may not be as virtuous (and skepticism may not be as vicious!) as jonathan suggests.
October 23, 2025 at 4:58 PM
mostly, though, this paper is a response to @jichikawa.bsky.social’s book epistemic courage. i argue that epistemic courage may not be as virtuous (and skepticism may not be as vicious!) as jonathan suggests.
Reposted by dr. nipple slipple
subscribe to my newsletter. i am the only journalist brave enough to read the About section of centrist think tanks.
stringinamaze.net/subscribe
stringinamaze.net/subscribe
August 26, 2025 at 5:55 PM
subscribe to my newsletter. i am the only journalist brave enough to read the About section of centrist think tanks.
stringinamaze.net/subscribe
stringinamaze.net/subscribe
hahaha thank you that part also makes me laugh 😂
August 26, 2025 at 5:31 AM
hahaha thank you that part also makes me laugh 😂
i argue that:
1) impurist epistemologies are not more socially engaged just because they “make space” for social, moral, and political factors in ways purists do not,
2) comparing standpoint theory and moral/pragmatic encroachment is unhelpful, and
3) feminists’ aversion to purism is misplaced
1) impurist epistemologies are not more socially engaged just because they “make space” for social, moral, and political factors in ways purists do not,
2) comparing standpoint theory and moral/pragmatic encroachment is unhelpful, and
3) feminists’ aversion to purism is misplaced
August 25, 2025 at 9:43 PM
i argue that:
1) impurist epistemologies are not more socially engaged just because they “make space” for social, moral, and political factors in ways purists do not,
2) comparing standpoint theory and moral/pragmatic encroachment is unhelpful, and
3) feminists’ aversion to purism is misplaced
1) impurist epistemologies are not more socially engaged just because they “make space” for social, moral, and political factors in ways purists do not,
2) comparing standpoint theory and moral/pragmatic encroachment is unhelpful, and
3) feminists’ aversion to purism is misplaced
Reposted by dr. nipple slipple
But in its actual content I think it's true & important: retaining the ability to see a behaviour as actually anti social and worthy of condemnation, without writing off the person engaged in the behaviour as unworthy of any support or incapable of improvement, is morally foundational. Vital.
July 26, 2025 at 8:53 AM
But in its actual content I think it's true & important: retaining the ability to see a behaviour as actually anti social and worthy of condemnation, without writing off the person engaged in the behaviour as unworthy of any support or incapable of improvement, is morally foundational. Vital.
Reposted by dr. nipple slipple
Is Daniel Kodsi a complete fucking joke?
Let’s see what happens when someone (I would say foolishly) tries to engage with him
Let’s see what happens when someone (I would say foolishly) tries to engage with him
July 25, 2025 at 10:59 PM
Is Daniel Kodsi a complete fucking joke?
Let’s see what happens when someone (I would say foolishly) tries to engage with him
Let’s see what happens when someone (I would say foolishly) tries to engage with him
Reposted by dr. nipple slipple
I'm sick of all the conspiracy mongering about a dead guy who just happened to be a pedophile connected to multiple world leaders.
July 17, 2025 at 12:44 AM
I'm sick of all the conspiracy mongering about a dead guy who just happened to be a pedophile connected to multiple world leaders.