I'm on the PhD application cycle for Fall '26!
www.shadabchy.com
Exhibit A: openreview.net/forum?id=8qk...
Exhibit B: openreview.net/forum?id=GlX...
Exhibit C: openreview.net/forum?id=kDh...
Exhibit A: openreview.net/forum?id=8qk...
Exhibit B: openreview.net/forum?id=GlX...
Exhibit C: openreview.net/forum?id=kDh...
Very impressive work, esp. the inference process.
www.lumine-ai.org
arxiv.org/abs/2511.08892
Very impressive work, esp. the inference process.
www.lumine-ai.org
arxiv.org/abs/2511.08892
ReSkies much appreciated
ReSkies much appreciated
It's a bit of a weirdly basic question, but I'm not up to date with instruction tuning. (I'm looking at model-agnostic single-turn Prompt-Response paired data, and ShareGPT is really messy and multi-turn)
It's a bit of a weirdly basic question, but I'm not up to date with instruction tuning. (I'm looking at model-agnostic single-turn Prompt-Response paired data, and ShareGPT is really messy and multi-turn)
I'm in the room and it's SO obvious to me that a video with generated images/panning stock photos and a steady, droning narration in numbered list format is slop. Even he can tell
But for how much longer?
I'm in the room and it's SO obvious to me that a video with generated images/panning stock photos and a steady, droning narration in numbered list format is slop. Even he can tell
But for how much longer?
Tearing those down to the studs and rebuilding wouldn’t suck
www.sri.inf.ethz.ch/blog/k2think
www.sri.inf.ethz.ch/blog/k2think
credits: u/showermusicc on reddit
credits: u/showermusicc on reddit
For all the talk of decline - borne out by several metrics - the science community seems to have adopted Bluesky more than others.
Story: www.theguardian.com/technology/2...
Apparently 60k+ reviews was too much to handle. Hope no one's getting desk rejected at AAAI over non-submission of revieiws.
Apparently 60k+ reviews was too much to handle. Hope no one's getting desk rejected at AAAI over non-submission of revieiws.
<short note on where/why I'm citing this>
<url>
😮💨
Zotero's great, but at this stage of writing, adding things as I find them seems to interrupt my stream of consciousness
<short note on where/why I'm citing this>
<url>
😮💨
Zotero's great, but at this stage of writing, adding things as I find them seems to interrupt my stream of consciousness
I love the inclusivity but I'm concerned about how sustainable this is.
I love the inclusivity but I'm concerned about how sustainable this is.
This is called an API.
This is called an API.
And it's kind of refreshing because it's what the internet used to be like 10-ish years ago.
And it's kind of refreshing because it's what the internet used to be like 10-ish years ago.
The "center of AI discourse" no longer exists. r/MachineLearning had solid discourse killed by the API boycott. AI Twitter got swamped by grifters and then killed by algorithm changes and fascist takeovers. On Bsky it was obviously stifled in the cradle.
Moral awakening among tech people? Nope. Bluesky deciding to be nicer to AI people? Nope.
What will eventually change things, I suspect, is OAI &/or Google deciding that it's a mistake to let public AI discourse be hosted by a direct competitor. +
The "center of AI discourse" no longer exists. r/MachineLearning had solid discourse killed by the API boycott. AI Twitter got swamped by grifters and then killed by algorithm changes and fascist takeovers. On Bsky it was obviously stifled in the cradle.
I'd never even dare to show up at immigration without a full, precise itinerary, proof of purpose of visit, and even letters of leave of absence from my job/school.
https://beatofhawaii.com/why-these-hawaii-travelers-were-jailed-and-deported/
I'd never even dare to show up at immigration without a full, precise itinerary, proof of purpose of visit, and even letters of leave of absence from my job/school.
(and this is honestly contributing a lot to the over abundance of papers in the field)
(and this is honestly contributing a lot to the over abundance of papers in the field)
𝘛𝘩𝘢𝘵'𝘴 why people complain so much about the review process
𝘛𝘩𝘢𝘵'𝘴 why people complain so much about the review process
openreview.net/forum?id=et5...
@kempelab.bsky.social refused to cite Schaeffer and Gerstgrasser's (no Bsky @) prior paper on Model Collapse at COLM on grounds of ethical and quality concerns.
AC rejects. PCs override and accept.
openreview.net/forum?id=et5...
@kempelab.bsky.social refused to cite Schaeffer and Gerstgrasser's (no Bsky @) prior paper on Model Collapse at COLM on grounds of ethical and quality concerns.
AC rejects. PCs override and accept.