Marius D. Hafstad, Ph.D.
banner
mhduhovic.bsky.social
Marius D. Hafstad, Ph.D.
@mhduhovic.bsky.social
I study individuals’ perceptions and group norms, values, and beliefs. Often in the context of organizations. Also leadership and well-being | Manager @PwC
Pinned
What if the same energy that drives your passion for work could also lead to burnout?

I’m thrilled to share that me and @omidvebrahimi.bsky.social explore this paradox in our latest study published in Stress and Health.

Read more: onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/...

#OHPsych #IOPsych #OHP
Loved this episode with @syeducation.bsky.social. Great reflections on why we need to care about rigor in science by acknowledging ideology
January 30, 2025 at 3:42 PM
Reposted by Marius D. Hafstad, Ph.D.
@chelseaparlett.bsky.social I'm shocked partial pooling didn't make it into the meme
January 28, 2025 at 7:19 PM
Reposted by Marius D. Hafstad, Ph.D.
There are many issues with articles, but one of the biggest is when they are seen as credible after being peer-reviewed.
There are many issues with preprints, but one of the biggest is when they are seen as credible before being peer-reviewed.

This is potentially very dangerous. A 🧵

🧪 #SciPub #AcademicSky
Preprints often make news. Many people don’t know what they are
The public needs context about unreviewed manuscripts, survey suggests
www.science.org
January 11, 2025 at 11:50 AM
Reposted by Marius D. Hafstad, Ph.D.
📚 Prevalence of Transparent Research Practices in Psychology: A Cross-Sectional Study of Empirical Articles Published in 2022
journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/...
January 9, 2025 at 6:20 PM
I just uploaded the latest version of the preprint: «Organizing for Engagement: A Multilevel Examination of the Relationship Between Clan Culture and Work Engagement». Genuinely curious and interested in any feedback on this paper!

Link: osf.io/preprints/ps...

#OrganizationalPsychology #OHP
January 5, 2025 at 8:43 PM
Reposted by Marius D. Hafstad, Ph.D.
📣 Seeking Panelists for #AOM2025!

👋🏻 Calling all #IOPsych / #WellBeing colleagues! I'm organizing a panel for the AOM conference in Copenhagen, DK (July 25-29), discussing the limitations of 𝙋𝙀𝙍𝙁𝙊𝙍𝙈𝘼𝙉𝘾𝙀 as the "ultimate criterion" and Tay et al.'s (2023) position to expand it to include 𝙒𝙀𝙇𝙇-𝘽𝙀𝙄𝙉𝙂.
December 31, 2024 at 2:45 PM
Reposted by Marius D. Hafstad, Ph.D.
Very interesting and accessible take on probability worth a read!

www.nature.com/articles/d41...
December 18, 2024 at 4:40 PM
Reposted by Marius D. Hafstad, Ph.D.
In this new article in American Psychologist we respond to critics in detail and clarify two key points for the field;

(1) The prevalence of misinformation in society is substantial when properly defined.

(2) Misinformation causally impacts attitudes and behaviors.

psycnet.apa.org/fulltext/202...
December 16, 2024 at 11:16 AM
One of the really important problems we need to deal with sooner rather than later

#philsci
#organizationalpsychology
#OHP
“Science publishing has become a multimillion-dollar Ponzi scheme at the expense of taxpayers and scientists themselves,” argues Alex Gomez-Marin. | https://buff.ly/41CX6aP

Tap to read more about how the real experts don’t know ‘the truth’ about science.

#philsci #ethics
Science publishing is a multimillion-dollar Ponzi scheme | Àlex Gómez-Marín
buff.ly
December 26, 2024 at 12:36 PM
Reposted by Marius D. Hafstad, Ph.D.
Instead of listing my publications, as the year draws to an end, I want to shine the spotlight on the commonplace assumption that productivity must always increase. Good research is disruptive and thinking time is central to high quality scholarship and necessary for disruptive research.
December 20, 2024 at 11:18 AM
Great advice I wish I knew in the beginning of my PhD👇
Three must read papers for PhD students. #scisky #PhD #science #research #academicsky

1. The importance of stupidity in scientific research

Open Access
journals.biologists.com/jcs/article/...
December 16, 2024 at 8:14 AM
Reposted by Marius D. Hafstad, Ph.D.
Sixth, in this article (just published!), I provide an accessible overview of ontology, epistemology, and axiology, showing how they combine to form 7 common research paradigms. I also explore the methodological and ethical implications of these paradigms.
#AcademicSky #ScienceSky #research
Demystifying Research Paradigms: Navigating Ontology, Epistemology, and Axiology in Research
A sound understanding of research paradigms is crucial for developing coherent and philosophically grounded research designs, particularly in the humanities and social sciences. This paper offers an a...
doi.org
December 6, 2024 at 2:57 AM
Reposted by Marius D. Hafstad, Ph.D.
The world is awful. The world is much better. The world can be much better.

All three statements are true at the same time. Understanding this is key to solving big global problems.

We believe data & research can help us understand both the problems we face & the progress that’s possible. 🧵
December 10, 2024 at 1:05 PM
Reposted by Marius D. Hafstad, Ph.D.
Do you need educational and psychological item response data to do your research? The IRW has 600 item response datasets (more coming!), distributed in a standardized format and ready for analysis.
December 10, 2024 at 5:39 PM
Reposted by Marius D. Hafstad, Ph.D.
Reposted by Marius D. Hafstad, Ph.D.

New meta-analysis by Bardach et al #PsychBull

Intergroup contact does very well relative to other school interventions to reduce prejudice.

I feel like I'm watching a horserace here!

Go contact!

psycnet.apa.org/fulltext/202... #PrejudiceResearch
December 10, 2024 at 5:12 PM
Reposted by Marius D. Hafstad, Ph.D.
What if the same energy that drives your passion for work could also lead to burnout?

I’m thrilled to share that me and @omidvebrahimi.bsky.social explore this paradox in our latest study published in Stress and Health.

Read more: onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/...

#OHPsych #IOPsych #OHP
December 5, 2024 at 6:24 PM
Reposted by Marius D. Hafstad, Ph.D.
Scientific Method and Scientific Madness: Scientific conclusions need not be accurate, justified, or believed by their authors

New post discussing a provocative & memorable 2021 article by @haicinnamon.bsky.social & @lastpositivist.bsky.social !

www.psychiatrymargins.com/p/scientific...
Scientific Method and Scientific Madness
Scientific conclusions need not be accurate, justified, or believed by their authors
www.psychiatrymargins.com
December 7, 2024 at 8:28 PM
What if the same energy that drives your passion for work could also lead to burnout?

I’m thrilled to share that me and @omidvebrahimi.bsky.social explore this paradox in our latest study published in Stress and Health.

Read more: onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/...

#OHPsych #IOPsych #OHP
December 5, 2024 at 6:24 PM
As I-O psychologists, we often focus on improving how we communicate our science to the public, but are we asking the right questions? Are we producing knowledge that genuinely addresses the needs of organizations and individuals, or are we prioritizing academic trends over practical relevance?
December 3, 2024 at 3:54 PM
Reposted by Marius D. Hafstad, Ph.D.
Where are the rest of the #Leadership scholars on Bluesky?

#LeadSciSky #AcademicSky #socialpsyc #BehSciSky 🧪

go.bsky.app/LPstwp1
November 30, 2024 at 7:35 PM
Reposted by Marius D. Hafstad, Ph.D.
This is such important work. An absolute must-read that tries to break down some walls around how much the academic world spends in Article Processing Charges. #OpenAccess #OpenScience and also an #OpenData set to further research and analyze.
November 23, 2024 at 7:35 AM
Reposted by Marius D. Hafstad, Ph.D.
Trying something new:
A 🧵 on a topic I find many students struggle with: "why do their 📊 look more professional than my 📊?"

It's *lots* of tiny decisions that aren't the defaults in many libraries, so let's break down 1 simple graph by @jburnmurdoch.bsky.social

🔗 www.ft.com/content/73a1...
November 20, 2024 at 5:09 PM
Reposted by Marius D. Hafstad, Ph.D.
Interesting commentary by Ravid et al. (2024) on bridging the science-practice gap in #IOPsych through industry-academic partnerships. Definitely worth a read, particularly if this gap irks you like it does me!
Check out our recent IOP commentary on narrowing the science-practice gap using industry-academic collaborations. Had a great time working with Ray Wu, Emily Campion, Georgi Yankov, Richard Landers, and Chase Winterberg on this one.

www.cambridge.org/core/journal...
A panel discussion on addressing the science–practice gap with academic–industry collaborations | Industrial and Organizational Psychology | Cambridge Core
A panel discussion on addressing the science–practice gap with academic–industry collaborations - Volume 17 Issue 4
www.cambridge.org
November 21, 2024 at 9:42 PM
Reposted by Marius D. Hafstad, Ph.D.
Pleased to see this article shared here. Why we shouldn’t take concepts as gospel truths but need to treat them as ‘ideas that need to be chewed up constantly’. #iopsych #OHP #criticalthinking

Great read - www.bps.org.uk/psychologist...

@psychmag.bsky.social
@bpsofficial.bsky.social
November 18, 2024 at 9:27 AM