Flattering sports scientists finally listening re sample-size
Led by a king of citation fraud @nireynon.bsky.social ignores >> studies eg. RUNX1 identified by Keller et al. 2011. So much wrong with the work & authors
www.cell.com/cell-reports...
When most detectable genes change in a transcriptomic study the principles of global normalisation fail - blind use of code is dumb.
Baseline VO2max doesn't predict gains in VO2max & changes in gene expression without evidence physiological adaptation are of dubious meaning.
When most detectable genes change in a transcriptomic study the principles of global normalisation fail - blind use of code is dumb.
Baseline VO2max doesn't predict gains in VO2max & changes in gene expression without evidence physiological adaptation are of dubious meaning.
"The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world she was an honest scientist" Keyser Soze?
www.nature.com/articles/s44...
"The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world she was an honest scientist" Keyser Soze?
www.nature.com/articles/s44...
"The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world she was an honest scientist" Keyser Soze?
www.nature.com/articles/s44...
"The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world she was an honest scientist" Keyser Soze?
www.nature.com/articles/s44...
Here established (white ppl) DNAm "aging" clocks fall apart in other ethnicities (& as usual don't explain much clinical variation in anyone)
www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1...
Here established (white ppl) DNAm "aging" clocks fall apart in other ethnicities (& as usual don't explain much clinical variation in anyone)
www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1...
Here established (white ppl) DNAm "aging" clocks fall apart in other ethnicities (& as usual don't explain much clinical variation in anyone)
www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1...
Here established (white ppl) DNAm "aging" clocks fall apart in other ethnicities (& as usual don't explain much clinical variation in anyone)
www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1...
Aside from this, the trial design is flawed. It's well established the IS response to a training program (single arm) are >> heterogeneous, i.e. mean differences between small subgroups, on different treatments, can't be attributed to protocol alone 🤦♂️
Aside from this, the trial design is flawed. It's well established the IS response to a training program (single arm) are >> heterogeneous, i.e. mean differences between small subgroups, on different treatments, can't be attributed to protocol alone 🤦♂️
2/3 How do u publish a study like this & not cite the largest HIT study in over-weight, sedentary adults (doi.org/10.3389/fend...) with varying degrees of IR, where they identified a molecular signature related (doi.org/10.1093/nar/...) to reversal of IR?
2/3 How do u publish a study like this & not cite the largest HIT study in over-weight, sedentary adults (doi.org/10.3389/fend...) with varying degrees of IR, where they identified a molecular signature related (doi.org/10.1093/nar/...) to reversal of IR?
in individuals with prediabetes
academic.oup.com/ejendo/artic...
Danish researchers, Knop, Vilsboll et al once again proving they have either no access to Pubmed, or they are happy to dishonestly reflect the state of the literature
in individuals with prediabetes
academic.oup.com/ejendo/artic...
Danish researchers, Knop, Vilsboll et al once again proving they have either no access to Pubmed, or they are happy to dishonestly reflect the state of the literature
link.springer.com/article/10.1...
link.springer.com/article/10.1...
No matching of physical activity or VO2max means this isn't T2DM, this is an unreliable story.
> 20yr ago Mootha also presented something as T2DM, when online the hidden VO2max data explained all of the OXPHOS story
link.springer.com/article/10.1...
No matching of physical activity or VO2max means this isn't T2DM, this is an unreliable story.
> 20yr ago Mootha also presented something as T2DM, when online the hidden VO2max data explained all of the OXPHOS story
Flattering sports scientists finally listening re sample-size
Led by a king of citation fraud @nireynon.bsky.social ignores >> studies eg. RUNX1 identified by Keller et al. 2011. So much wrong with the work & authors
www.cell.com/cell-reports...
Flattering sports scientists finally listening re sample-size
Led by a king of citation fraud @nireynon.bsky.social ignores >> studies eg. RUNX1 identified by Keller et al. 2011. So much wrong with the work & authors
www.cell.com/cell-reports...
"Oncotarget’s Image Forensics analysis identified multiple instances of image manipulations".
What a crappy move from Oncotarget.
HT: @thatsregrettab1.bsky.social
pubpeer.com/publications...
"Oncotarget’s Image Forensics analysis identified multiple instances of image manipulations".
What a crappy move from Oncotarget.
HT: @thatsregrettab1.bsky.social
pubpeer.com/publications...
Flattering sports scientists finally listening re sample-size
Led by a king of citation fraud @nireynon.bsky.social ignores >> studies eg. RUNX1 identified by Keller et al. 2011. So much wrong with the work & authors
www.cell.com/cell-reports...
Flattering sports scientists finally listening re sample-size
Led by a king of citation fraud @nireynon.bsky.social ignores >> studies eg. RUNX1 identified by Keller et al. 2011. So much wrong with the work & authors
www.cell.com/cell-reports...
Several PubPeer users have been able to register on ScienceGuardians and post the exact same type of concerns.
Why is PubPeer "unaccountable" and "malicious" and SG "respectful" and "accountable"?
I see absolutely no difference.
Several PubPeer users have been able to register on ScienceGuardians and post the exact same type of concerns.
Why is PubPeer "unaccountable" and "malicious" and SG "respectful" and "accountable"?
I see absolutely no difference.
Acceptable image-editing practices are partly a matter of common sense. But researchers say journals and funders could help scientists by standardizing policies.
@sarareardon.bsky.social reports
www.nature.com/articles/d41...
Acceptable image-editing practices are partly a matter of common sense. But researchers say journals and funders could help scientists by standardizing policies.
@sarareardon.bsky.social reports
www.nature.com/articles/d41...
As usual, headline below is more marketing than clinical science.
www.cell.com/cell-metabol...
As usual, headline below is more marketing than clinical science.
On different genetics, different diet or different housing temperature who knows 🤷♂️
Broader question is how often are KO/TG mice on one background informative ?
And of course #justinmice
On different genetics, different diet or different housing temperature who knows 🤷♂️
Broader question is how often are KO/TG mice on one background informative ?
And of course #justinmice
2025: Muscle fiber Myc is dispensable for muscle growth
rdcu.be/egQbm
2024: MYC is sufficient for muscle growth
www.embopress.org/doi/full/10....
2013: MYC was negatively linked to RT growth
doi.org/10.1371/jour...
2025: Muscle fiber Myc is dispensable for muscle growth
rdcu.be/egQbm
2024: MYC is sufficient for muscle growth
www.embopress.org/doi/full/10....
2013: MYC was negatively linked to RT growth
doi.org/10.1371/jour...
Organised by @pgreenhaff.bsky.social & focusing on:
🚑 Injury and rehabilitation
⛰️ Altitude physiology
🦵 Muscle adaptation
🚴 Exercise training
💉 Pharmacological interventions
⚙️ Body composition
🔗 buff.ly/2sVbnLk
doi.org/10.14814/phy...
Yet lack of physical activity measures renders study invalid.
Seems physiology journals can't do physiology - more interested in making money your social gatherings than good science?
@physoc.bsky.social
doi.org/10.14814/phy...
Yet lack of physical activity measures renders study invalid.
Seems physiology journals can't do physiology - more interested in making money your social gatherings than good science?
@physoc.bsky.social
journals.physiology.org/doi/abs/10.1...
journals.physiology.org/doi/abs/10.1...
link.springer.com/article/10.1...
No matching of physical activity or VO2max means this isn't T2DM, this is an unreliable story.
> 20yr ago Mootha also presented something as T2DM, when online the hidden VO2max data explained all of the OXPHOS story
link.springer.com/article/10.1...
No matching of physical activity or VO2max means this isn't T2DM, this is an unreliable story.
> 20yr ago Mootha also presented something as T2DM, when online the hidden VO2max data explained all of the OXPHOS story