Lord of Crime
@lord-of-crime.bsky.social
Reposted by Lord of Crime
Breaking:
FORT LAUDERDALE, Fla. (AP) - Federal judge orders unsealing of grand jury transcripts from abandoned Jeffrey Epstein investigation in Florida.
FORT LAUDERDALE, Fla. (AP) - Federal judge orders unsealing of grand jury transcripts from abandoned Jeffrey Epstein investigation in Florida.
December 5, 2025 at 6:35 PM
Breaking:
FORT LAUDERDALE, Fla. (AP) - Federal judge orders unsealing of grand jury transcripts from abandoned Jeffrey Epstein investigation in Florida.
FORT LAUDERDALE, Fla. (AP) - Federal judge orders unsealing of grand jury transcripts from abandoned Jeffrey Epstein investigation in Florida.
Reposted by Lord of Crime
We should do a massive fundraiser for the first reporter who finds out the Twitter handle of Gorsuch, Thomas or one of those ghouls.
My theory, fwiw, is that Supreme Court Justices are not immune to Twitter brain poisoning. I suspect all six have horrific information environments and have therefore lost the ability to understand the people who don't agree with them.
The part that I can't figure out is what John Roberts thinks he is doing. He used to seem to be a judge who was very attentive to appearances, I think on a theory that you can't draw too much attention to yourself without undermining your ability to continue to shape the law.
December 5, 2025 at 8:15 PM
We should do a massive fundraiser for the first reporter who finds out the Twitter handle of Gorsuch, Thomas or one of those ghouls.
Reposted by Lord of Crime
For Thomas and Alito, it's regular FOX news brain poisoning. Remember the ACA questioning and one of those two went on a baffling digression about broccoli that was ripped straight from FOX? They've drunken the brain worms punch
My theory, fwiw, is that Supreme Court Justices are not immune to Twitter brain poisoning. I suspect all six have horrific information environments and have therefore lost the ability to understand the people who don't agree with them.
The part that I can't figure out is what John Roberts thinks he is doing. He used to seem to be a judge who was very attentive to appearances, I think on a theory that you can't draw too much attention to yourself without undermining your ability to continue to shape the law.
December 5, 2025 at 9:31 PM
For Thomas and Alito, it's regular FOX news brain poisoning. Remember the ACA questioning and one of those two went on a baffling digression about broccoli that was ripped straight from FOX? They've drunken the brain worms punch
Reposted by Lord of Crime
Mm-hm; exactly. An elite embrace of unreality is well advanced at the Supreme Court, and we're living through the consequences of it.
My theory, fwiw, is that Supreme Court Justices are not immune to Twitter brain poisoning. I suspect all six have horrific information environments and have therefore lost the ability to understand the people who don't agree with them.
The part that I can't figure out is what John Roberts thinks he is doing. He used to seem to be a judge who was very attentive to appearances, I think on a theory that you can't draw too much attention to yourself without undermining your ability to continue to shape the law.
December 5, 2025 at 9:34 PM
Mm-hm; exactly. An elite embrace of unreality is well advanced at the Supreme Court, and we're living through the consequences of it.
Reposted by Lord of Crime
Dude. Yes. Alito and Thomas are of course the standout examples, but all of the Republican justices have tells in their writing and their questioning indicating that they are, to varying degrees, marinating their brains in dumb bitch juice
My theory, fwiw, is that Supreme Court Justices are not immune to Twitter brain poisoning. I suspect all six have horrific information environments and have therefore lost the ability to understand the people who don't agree with them.
The part that I can't figure out is what John Roberts thinks he is doing. He used to seem to be a judge who was very attentive to appearances, I think on a theory that you can't draw too much attention to yourself without undermining your ability to continue to shape the law.
December 5, 2025 at 9:40 PM
Dude. Yes. Alito and Thomas are of course the standout examples, but all of the Republican justices have tells in their writing and their questioning indicating that they are, to varying degrees, marinating their brains in dumb bitch juice
Reposted by Lord of Crime
I think this is also why ACB ended up at least as much of a swing vote as Roberts despite being personally further right to start with: she's actually reasonably well-read, and it takes way longer to brain-poison someone who is and continues to be well-read than someone who is already a hack
My theory, fwiw, is that Supreme Court Justices are not immune to Twitter brain poisoning. I suspect all six have horrific information environments and have therefore lost the ability to understand the people who don't agree with them.
The part that I can't figure out is what John Roberts thinks he is doing. He used to seem to be a judge who was very attentive to appearances, I think on a theory that you can't draw too much attention to yourself without undermining your ability to continue to shape the law.
December 5, 2025 at 9:43 PM
I think this is also why ACB ended up at least as much of a swing vote as Roberts despite being personally further right to start with: she's actually reasonably well-read, and it takes way longer to brain-poison someone who is and continues to be well-read than someone who is already a hack
Reposted by Lord of Crime
It's not necessarily Twitter. These guys aren't tech-savvy enough to avoid getting caught posting. It wouldn't surprise me if they occasionally use the site, but the main vector is probably groupchats with insane Republican grandees who *have* poisoned themselves on Twitter and elsewhere.
My theory, fwiw, is that Supreme Court Justices are not immune to Twitter brain poisoning. I suspect all six have horrific information environments and have therefore lost the ability to understand the people who don't agree with them.
The part that I can't figure out is what John Roberts thinks he is doing. He used to seem to be a judge who was very attentive to appearances, I think on a theory that you can't draw too much attention to yourself without undermining your ability to continue to shape the law.
December 5, 2025 at 9:45 PM
It's not necessarily Twitter. These guys aren't tech-savvy enough to avoid getting caught posting. It wouldn't surprise me if they occasionally use the site, but the main vector is probably groupchats with insane Republican grandees who *have* poisoned themselves on Twitter and elsewhere.
Reposted by Lord of Crime
My theory, fwiw, is that Supreme Court Justices are not immune to Twitter brain poisoning. I suspect all six have horrific information environments and have therefore lost the ability to understand the people who don't agree with them.
The part that I can't figure out is what John Roberts thinks he is doing. He used to seem to be a judge who was very attentive to appearances, I think on a theory that you can't draw too much attention to yourself without undermining your ability to continue to shape the law.
Every legal story now is either
Ancient Circuit Judge Delivers Crystal Clear 100 Page Rebuke To Trumpist Overreach
or
In Unsigned Shadow Docket Decision, 6-3 Majority Declares Trump Can Hunt People For Sport
Ancient Circuit Judge Delivers Crystal Clear 100 Page Rebuke To Trumpist Overreach
or
In Unsigned Shadow Docket Decision, 6-3 Majority Declares Trump Can Hunt People For Sport
December 5, 2025 at 8:09 PM
My theory, fwiw, is that Supreme Court Justices are not immune to Twitter brain poisoning. I suspect all six have horrific information environments and have therefore lost the ability to understand the people who don't agree with them.
Reposted by Lord of Crime
Do they just think there'll never be enough of a backlash for court packing to happen? What is the political theory of the case?
December 5, 2025 at 7:50 PM
Do they just think there'll never be enough of a backlash for court packing to happen? What is the political theory of the case?
Reposted by Lord of Crime
But ever since Trump v US (or maybe since Dobbs) he's stopped trying to maintain appearances and won't slow things down. The court's majority wants to do the most radical thing right now.
December 5, 2025 at 7:50 PM
But ever since Trump v US (or maybe since Dobbs) he's stopped trying to maintain appearances and won't slow things down. The court's majority wants to do the most radical thing right now.
Reposted by Lord of Crime
In other words, he seemed to want to do a bunch of far-right policy *slowly* so that the public wouldn't turn on the court enough to weaken it.
December 5, 2025 at 7:50 PM
In other words, he seemed to want to do a bunch of far-right policy *slowly* so that the public wouldn't turn on the court enough to weaken it.
Reposted by Lord of Crime
The part that I can't figure out is what John Roberts thinks he is doing. He used to seem to be a judge who was very attentive to appearances, I think on a theory that you can't draw too much attention to yourself without undermining your ability to continue to shape the law.
Every legal story now is either
Ancient Circuit Judge Delivers Crystal Clear 100 Page Rebuke To Trumpist Overreach
or
In Unsigned Shadow Docket Decision, 6-3 Majority Declares Trump Can Hunt People For Sport
Ancient Circuit Judge Delivers Crystal Clear 100 Page Rebuke To Trumpist Overreach
or
In Unsigned Shadow Docket Decision, 6-3 Majority Declares Trump Can Hunt People For Sport
December 5, 2025 at 7:50 PM
The part that I can't figure out is what John Roberts thinks he is doing. He used to seem to be a judge who was very attentive to appearances, I think on a theory that you can't draw too much attention to yourself without undermining your ability to continue to shape the law.
Reposted by Lord of Crime
Every legal story now is either
Ancient Circuit Judge Delivers Crystal Clear 100 Page Rebuke To Trumpist Overreach
or
In Unsigned Shadow Docket Decision, 6-3 Majority Declares Trump Can Hunt People For Sport
Ancient Circuit Judge Delivers Crystal Clear 100 Page Rebuke To Trumpist Overreach
or
In Unsigned Shadow Docket Decision, 6-3 Majority Declares Trump Can Hunt People For Sport
October 3, 2025 at 10:26 PM
Every legal story now is either
Ancient Circuit Judge Delivers Crystal Clear 100 Page Rebuke To Trumpist Overreach
or
In Unsigned Shadow Docket Decision, 6-3 Majority Declares Trump Can Hunt People For Sport
Ancient Circuit Judge Delivers Crystal Clear 100 Page Rebuke To Trumpist Overreach
or
In Unsigned Shadow Docket Decision, 6-3 Majority Declares Trump Can Hunt People For Sport
Reposted by Lord of Crime
the law is real until it gets to SCOTUS at which point it becomes fake, which doesn't bother the six reactionaries at the top but does undermine literally everyone else in the profession
September 30, 2025 at 5:17 PM
the law is real until it gets to SCOTUS at which point it becomes fake, which doesn't bother the six reactionaries at the top but does undermine literally everyone else in the profession
Reposted by Lord of Crime
quite something that almost every court in the land except like one in Amarillo and the highest in the land routinely tell Trump to go pound sand
September 30, 2025 at 5:14 PM
quite something that almost every court in the land except like one in Amarillo and the highest in the land routinely tell Trump to go pound sand
Reposted by Lord of Crime
Getting vaccinated is like paying your taxes. It should not be optional.
December 5, 2025 at 5:24 PM
Getting vaccinated is like paying your taxes. It should not be optional.
Reposted by Lord of Crime
I've always thought that the better response to anti-vax sentiment from communities without a well-rooted fear of the medical-scientific community is "shut the fuck up, get your shot or you will be punished" rather than attempting to get people to understand.
We're going to have to jam civilization and science down some people's throats.
December 5, 2025 at 5:24 PM
I've always thought that the better response to anti-vax sentiment from communities without a well-rooted fear of the medical-scientific community is "shut the fuck up, get your shot or you will be punished" rather than attempting to get people to understand.
Reposted by Lord of Crime
This document could have been 14 words long and nothing would have been lost.
December 5, 2025 at 5:22 AM
This document could have been 14 words long and nothing would have been lost.
Reposted by Lord of Crime
The top priority listed in this document is “Ending Mass Migration.”
Hard to highlight a single passage here—this entire page is a pretty explicit defense of using the state as a means of enforcing white supremacy.
Hard to highlight a single passage here—this entire page is a pretty explicit defense of using the state as a means of enforcing white supremacy.
December 5, 2025 at 5:21 AM
The top priority listed in this document is “Ending Mass Migration.”
Hard to highlight a single passage here—this entire page is a pretty explicit defense of using the state as a means of enforcing white supremacy.
Hard to highlight a single passage here—this entire page is a pretty explicit defense of using the state as a means of enforcing white supremacy.
Reposted by Lord of Crime
Great Replacement Theory is in the National Security Strategy of the U.S.
In a section titled “Sovereignty and Respect,” the regime says it will fight the “cynical manipulation of our immigration system to build up voting blocs loyal to foreign interests within our country.”
In a section titled “Sovereignty and Respect,” the regime says it will fight the “cynical manipulation of our immigration system to build up voting blocs loyal to foreign interests within our country.”
December 5, 2025 at 5:16 AM
Great Replacement Theory is in the National Security Strategy of the U.S.
In a section titled “Sovereignty and Respect,” the regime says it will fight the “cynical manipulation of our immigration system to build up voting blocs loyal to foreign interests within our country.”
In a section titled “Sovereignty and Respect,” the regime says it will fight the “cynical manipulation of our immigration system to build up voting blocs loyal to foreign interests within our country.”
Reposted by Lord of Crime
The new national security strategy of the U.S. says Trump’s war on DEI is “re-instilling a culture of competence.”
Tell that to the Ssectretary.
Tell that to the Ssectretary.
December 5, 2025 at 5:09 AM
The new national security strategy of the U.S. says Trump’s war on DEI is “re-instilling a culture of competence.”
Tell that to the Ssectretary.
Tell that to the Ssectretary.
Reposted by Lord of Crime
The new National Security Strategy of the U.S. contains some pretty explicit white nationalism:
“We want to support our allies in preserving the freedom and security of
Europe, while restoring Europe’s civilizational self-confidence and Western identity.”
“We want to support our allies in preserving the freedom and security of
Europe, while restoring Europe’s civilizational self-confidence and Western identity.”
December 5, 2025 at 5:02 AM
The new National Security Strategy of the U.S. contains some pretty explicit white nationalism:
“We want to support our allies in preserving the freedom and security of
Europe, while restoring Europe’s civilizational self-confidence and Western identity.”
“We want to support our allies in preserving the freedom and security of
Europe, while restoring Europe’s civilizational self-confidence and Western identity.”
Reposted by Lord of Crime
…for mental health and substance abuse disorder recovery services. They don't care about us.
Congress will continue oversight to hold this Administration accountable and ensure the President does not violate the War Powers Resolution by unilaterally dragging our nation into a war. (2/2)
Congress will continue oversight to hold this Administration accountable and ensure the President does not violate the War Powers Resolution by unilaterally dragging our nation into a war. (2/2)
December 5, 2025 at 8:48 PM
…for mental health and substance abuse disorder recovery services. They don't care about us.
Congress will continue oversight to hold this Administration accountable and ensure the President does not violate the War Powers Resolution by unilaterally dragging our nation into a war. (2/2)
Congress will continue oversight to hold this Administration accountable and ensure the President does not violate the War Powers Resolution by unilaterally dragging our nation into a war. (2/2)
Reposted by Lord of Crime
Pete Hegseth has carried out multiple unauthorized strikes on vessles in the Carribbean under the pretense of "protecting Americans from drugs on our streets."
If this administration cared about protecting Americans from addiction, they would not have slashed billions of dollars in funding… (1/2)
If this administration cared about protecting Americans from addiction, they would not have slashed billions of dollars in funding… (1/2)
December 5, 2025 at 8:48 PM
Pete Hegseth has carried out multiple unauthorized strikes on vessles in the Carribbean under the pretense of "protecting Americans from drugs on our streets."
If this administration cared about protecting Americans from addiction, they would not have slashed billions of dollars in funding… (1/2)
If this administration cared about protecting Americans from addiction, they would not have slashed billions of dollars in funding… (1/2)
Reposted by Lord of Crime
