Janyce McGregor
banner
janycemcgregor.bsky.social
Janyce McGregor
@janycemcgregor.bsky.social
Reporting on Canadian politics and international trade for @CBCNews. Raising three great kids with @michaelpetrou.
"Heavy rotation on the CBC. Whatever in hell that really means." (Kathleen Edwards)
Canada, previously:
"We can't develop our resource sector without more foreign investment."
(Some in) Canada, now:
"Oh no! Foreign investors are involved in this priority project! Maybe we shouldn't..."
Folks, we're gonna have to pick a lane here.
November 14, 2025 at 2:02 AM
Reposted by Janyce McGregor
1/ Unique typing style aside, the President raises an interesting question here:

Why do some like me think Congress and the Founders are comfortable with him banning or licensing an import during an economic emergency, but not applying a tariff on it?

Let's talk about it.
November 9, 2025 at 4:52 PM
It's like he watched a different hearing than everyone else - ?
November 6, 2025 at 12:23 AM
I'm covering events on the Hill today but my colleagues are watching SCOTUS for us -- and indeed, those Ontario ads did come up:
www.cbc.ca/news/world/l...
LIVE UPDATES | U.S. Supreme Court justices question Trump’s sweeping use of tariffs | CBC
www.cbc.ca
November 5, 2025 at 6:25 PM
Even by the standards of the genre, an extraordinary round of gaslighting by Trump admin officials on the Sunday talk show circuit. It’s become too overwhelming to fact check point by point. I guess that’s the strategy.
November 2, 2025 at 5:34 PM
© CBC/Radio-Canada 2025. All rights reserved.
www.cbc.ca
October 31, 2025 at 5:10 PM
Reposted by Janyce McGregor
"The Ontario ad was right: Reagan would not have approved of Mr. Trump’s protectionist trade policies, particularly when aimed at allies."
Excellent piece from @douglasirwin.bsky.social
Reagan: "We should beware of the demagogues who are ready to declare a trade war against our friends — weakening our economy, our national security and the entire free world — all while cynically waving the American flag
www.nytimes.com/2025/10/29/o...
Opinion | The Canadians Are Right About Reagan and Free Trade
www.nytimes.com
October 29, 2025 at 6:38 PM
Reposted by Janyce McGregor
Krugman is spot on. In 1982, I headed up the Commerce Department’s Industry Advisory Committee Program for trade negotiations. Earlier, under Reagan, I ran Commerce’s Trade Negotiations Division. I saw Reagan’s trade policy up close and personal. Trump, you’re not a Ronald Reagan.
No, Ronald Reagan Didn’t Love Tariffs
He wasn’t a free-trade purist, but he was nothing like Trump.
open.substack.com
October 27, 2025 at 7:12 PM
And...
In a news conference on Parliament Hill just now, the Canadian Cattle Association called for Canada to TERMINATE its trade continuity agreement with the U.K. because it continues to put up barriers to Canadian beef exports.
Just in case anyone thought trade diversification politically easy...
FES, 2018:
50% export growth by 2025
www.cbc.ca/news/politic...
Then came:
2 Michaels, Covid, Biden normalization, Ukraine, Nijjar killing
Goal articulated by PM Carney tonight: 2x non-U.S. growth (!)
Numerically impossible w/out big plays in Asia. Should be an interesting fall summit season.
www.cbc.ca
October 23, 2025 at 1:14 PM
FES, 2018:
50% export growth by 2025
www.cbc.ca/news/politic...
Then came:
2 Michaels, Covid, Biden normalization, Ukraine, Nijjar killing
Goal articulated by PM Carney tonight: 2x non-U.S. growth (!)
Numerically impossible w/out big plays in Asia. Should be an interesting fall summit season.
www.cbc.ca
October 23, 2025 at 1:25 AM
Reposted by Janyce McGregor
Just to be clear, the case is about specific tariffs under IEEPA. Even if SCOTUS says these tariffs are illegal, Trump has loads of other tariffs options, so his claims here make no sense.
Trump: "If this country is not allowed to have tariffs, if this country is not allowed to have the president negotiate on behalf of it w/tariffs, we are put in a position where we're gonna be a 3rd world country. We can't let that happen. I think it's the most important case that we are gonna have"
October 22, 2025 at 10:03 PM
Reposted by Janyce McGregor
Tariff exemptions mean that applied rates are below the headline. Whereas 94% of US goods imports from China face duties, for imports from Canada the share is just 10%.

From @tobyn.bsky.social
www.ft.com/content/c8f0...
And the NY Fed
libertystreeteconomics.newyorkfed.org/2025/10/a-co...
October 9, 2025 at 2:01 PM
Reposted by Janyce McGregor
At least tariffs created SOME jobs: lobbying jobs.

@bloomberg.com
@scottlincicome.bsky.social
October 1, 2025 at 1:52 PM
Reposted by Janyce McGregor
DHS deems collecting tariffs "essential," so will keep collecting them in the event of a government shutdown.

Meanwhile, if past USTR practice is any indication, negotiations on trade deals to obtain relief from the tariffs will pause.
www.politico.com/newsletters/...
September 29, 2025 at 2:05 PM
Reposted by Janyce McGregor
It's not that the US can't find some way to tax its own citizens for consuming foreign movies. They can.

It's that the US probably doesn't want to fire the starting gun on the "let's tariff services" conversation for the same reason Saudi Arabia didn't bankroll Al Gore's "An Inconvenient Truth."
September 29, 2025 at 2:46 PM
Reposted by Janyce McGregor
ALCOA CEO: “.. Tariffs can change very quickly, and therefore we don’t make an investment in the US based on a tariff.”

@semafor.com @beyer.house.gov
www.semafor.com/article/09/2...
September 24, 2025 at 7:22 PM
👀
Pretty big news in global trading circles

China will no longer ask for or avail itself of benefits and flexibilities for developing countries as a part of World Trade Organization negotiations, Beijing announced on Tuesday.
China says it will no longer seek developing country benefits at the WTO | InsideTrade.com
China will no longer ask for or avail itself of benefits and flexibilities for developing countries as a part of World Trade Organization negotiations, Beijing announced on Tuesday.
insidetrade.com
September 24, 2025 at 1:12 PM
Reposted by Janyce McGregor
1/18 The U.S. Trade Representative has initiated public consultations ahead of the mandatory USMCA review on July 1, 2026. This review will determine whether the US, Mexico, and Canada extend the agreement for another 16 years.

public-inspection.federalregister.gov/2025-18010.pdf
public-inspection.federalregister.gov
September 16, 2025 at 4:15 PM
Reposted by Janyce McGregor
BREAKING: The Supreme Court is granting an unusually quick hearing on whether President Donald Trump has the power under federal law to impose sweeping tariffs.
Supreme Court to quickly consider if President Donald Trump has power to impose sweeping tariffs
The Supreme Court is granting an unusually quick hearing on whether President Donald Trump has the power under federal law to impose sweeping tariffs.
bit.ly
September 9, 2025 at 8:41 PM
Reposted by Janyce McGregor
Interesting color in the administration's motion to SCOTUS to expedite the tariffs case from Treasury Sec. Bessent, who says the appeals court ruling on Friday against Trump's tariffs is already impacting trade talks:

"World leaders are ... walking away from or delaying negotiations," he says.
September 4, 2025 at 6:01 PM
Reposted by Janyce McGregor
The perils of using illegal tariffs to make "trade deals":

"US Trading Partners ‘Dazed and Confused’ After Tariff Court Loss"

Oh well! www.bloomberg.com/news/article...
August 31, 2025 at 1:28 PM