John 🌝
@heres.bsky.social
Data Analyst. Reconstruction Amendments Absolutist.
This is a false dichotomy
December 3, 2025 at 4:11 PM
This is a false dichotomy
Reactionary centrists have decided to call themselves "progressives" now since the centrist brand is so bad
December 3, 2025 at 2:23 PM
Reactionary centrists have decided to call themselves "progressives" now since the centrist brand is so bad
the same people are still there though, right?
November 24, 2025 at 5:29 PM
the same people are still there though, right?
Just a reminder that @ericswalwell.bsky.social smeared Mamdani during the campaign by saying “I don’t associate myself with what [Mamdani] has said about the Jewish people.” Mamdani said he’d protect Jews in NYC from antisemitic attacks. Swalwell doesn’t associate himself with fighting antisemitism?
I just called Gillbrand Jeffries Goldman & Swalwell and told them that by misrepresenting or ignoring Mamdani's actual words & policies, they're making me feel less safe in my own city. I said instead of their scaremongering, I want Mamdani and Lander's vision of us all coming together in NYC.
November 22, 2025 at 7:49 AM
Key tell of misleading charts: axis doesn't begin at 0
November 20, 2025 at 7:20 PM
Key tell of misleading charts: axis doesn't begin at 0
I think it says that any reason for any "temporary" redaction will be published in the federal register. It'd be impossible to know if everything was released and what was in the stuff reported as destroyed.
They might report that documents were destroyed and that they don't know what was in them.
They might report that documents were destroyed and that they don't know what was in them.
November 19, 2025 at 2:00 PM
I think it says that any reason for any "temporary" redaction will be published in the federal register. It'd be impossible to know if everything was released and what was in the stuff reported as destroyed.
They might report that documents were destroyed and that they don't know what was in them.
They might report that documents were destroyed and that they don't know what was in them.
Centrists depressed the vote too
November 19, 2025 at 1:44 PM
Centrists depressed the vote too
AFAIK the Senate will need a formal vote to override a veto. It was "deemed passed."
November 19, 2025 at 6:33 AM
AFAIK the Senate will need a formal vote to override a veto. It was "deemed passed."
"Former (also current) political operative"
November 19, 2025 at 6:15 AM
"Former (also current) political operative"
Definitely a clickbait title
November 15, 2025 at 8:22 PM
Definitely a clickbait title
Consultants are the commissioned officers of capital
November 15, 2025 at 8:20 PM
Consultants are the commissioned officers of capital
Waiting for the primaries seems to be the message from the establishment Dems, rather than a call for immediate resignations (where appropriate).
November 12, 2025 at 2:42 AM
Waiting for the primaries seems to be the message from the establishment Dems, rather than a call for immediate resignations (where appropriate).
Reposted by John 🌝
This is only page 3 and I'm so invested in learning more from this author. Luddite as an insult certainly gets thrown around a lot these days, and I'm happy to have their concise clarification on what side of history that movement was on at the very start of the book.
![Text from the book on page 3 reads "[...] other humans. No, this book is not a Luddite treatise--if, by Luddite, you mean a consumate techno-pessimist that believes all technological advancement is an anathema to human flourishing. But if by Luddite you mean a conscientious objection to top-down dictatorial automation of human thought and skill as a capitalist ploy for the devaluation of labor, and therefore the devaluation of laborers and human life in general... Then, yes. This is a Luddite treatise.
This book disambiguates the purposes of AI and its conscquences for humanity (and the environment) through descriptions of how AI projects produce, harm, and even kill disabled people. Through these stories, this book also provides a guide to the various and confusing meanings, methods, and impacts of "AI" in terms that are clear and relevant to everyday [...]"](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:2feqoni5dsr7hu4446qthqgj/bafkreiezixrst5b6h3onvdjoeldz3frhe7vpsc5nrmvlsjs5qvbygp7pxq@jpeg)
November 11, 2025 at 2:02 AM
This is only page 3 and I'm so invested in learning more from this author. Luddite as an insult certainly gets thrown around a lot these days, and I'm happy to have their concise clarification on what side of history that movement was on at the very start of the book.
"this is a great sacrifice (not ours, of course) for The Economy. Why don't people love this winning, data-backed message?
Can't people see the graph?"
Can't people see the graph?"
November 10, 2025 at 8:07 PM
"this is a great sacrifice (not ours, of course) for The Economy. Why don't people love this winning, data-backed message?
Can't people see the graph?"
Can't people see the graph?"