I find that insufferable.
There are 52 cards in a deck. The number of combinations of those cards is 52!, 52 factorial, and it's an exceptionally large number.
The sun will red giant and engulf the earth before the human race plays all combinations of that deck.
.
.
.
.
.
That Democrats knew how to write a No Kings budget, then only passed a tiny section of it to get Tim Kaine's vote, is galling.
.
.
www.psu.edu/news/researc...
.
I think we had one of these lackeys run for our local school board this month. On the plus side, they're a special Texas Stupid, so they're easy to spot, but I bet it plays in some parts of the country.
.
I think we had one of these lackeys run for our local school board this month. On the plus side, they're a special Texas Stupid, so they're easy to spot, but I bet it plays in some parts of the country.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
(Spellcheck does not know that word; it soon will!)
.
(Spellcheck does not know that word; it soon will!)
.
.
@sarahelizabethladd.bsky.social
kentuckylantern.com/2025/11/05/b...
.
.
.
I believe this is why the Democratic hegemony has not made a reversal of the Citizens United decision an absolute platform mandate; the electorate would.
I believe this is why the Democratic hegemony has not made a reversal of the Citizens United decision an absolute platform mandate; the electorate would.
That he lives under a rock, the fridge, or behind the commode, that's on brand.
.
That he lives under a rock, the fridge, or behind the commode, that's on brand.
.
Mamdani won *because* he presented an intelligent and engaged departure from the status quo.
That's not the DNC's DNA.
The president and his allies came after him.
Democratic leaders, by and large, did not have his back until the last minute.
He still won, turning out historic numbers and inspiring young voters.
His politics can win anywhere.
Mamdani won *because* he presented an intelligent and engaged departure from the status quo.
That's not the DNC's DNA.
.
.
This technique won't pass logical proof requirements, but consider the source, that could never happen.
This technique won't pass logical proof requirements, but consider the source, that could never happen.