Grizz Anarcho-Bear 🏴‍☠️🏳️‍⚧️
LightNews LightNews
banner
grizzbearrunt.bsky.social
Grizz Anarcho-Bear 🏴‍☠️🏳️‍⚧️
@grizzbearrunt.bsky.social
52 followers 55 following 60 posts
an actual adult trans person who doesnt have terminally online takes ama
Purists are not welcome, they're liars.
My beard grows, swelling with wisdom.
ADHD/GAD/MD
#BeMorePirate
#EatTheRich
#BLM
#LGBTQ
#TransRights
#ACAB
Posts Replies Media Videos
Reposted by Grizz Anarcho-Bear 🏴‍☠️🏳️‍⚧️
mtcstw.com
Absolute legends
November 17, 2025 at 5:46 AM
Reposted by Grizz Anarcho-Bear 🏴‍☠️🏳️‍⚧️
mtcstw.com
This is life in prison level foreign interference from Elon
November 23, 2025 at 3:19 AM
Reposted by Grizz Anarcho-Bear 🏴‍☠️🏳️‍⚧️
anyalogan.bsky.social
Get ‘em, Katelyn!
katelynburns.com Katelyn Burns @katelynburns.com · Nov 6
For @msnbc.com I wrote about how Tuesday's election gives Democrats the blueprint for overcoming Republican anti-trans attacks and how thus should settle all the talk about throwing trans people under the bus.

www.msnbc.com/opinion/msnb...
Opinion | Democrats’ election wins showed they don't need to hide their support for trans rights
Republicans repeated Trump's anti-trans strategy from 2024 and lost big. This should be instructive for Democrats.
www.msnbc.com
November 7, 2025 at 2:04 AM
Reposted by Grizz Anarcho-Bear 🏴‍☠️🏳️‍⚧️
ronfilipkowski.bsky.social
It might shock you to learn that Nancy Mace is involved in another batshit crazy controversy.
November 7, 2025 at 1:56 AM
Reposted by Grizz Anarcho-Bear 🏴‍☠️🏳️‍⚧️
katelynburns.com
"biological pronouns" is an insane phrase
chrisgeidner.bsky.social Chris Geidner @chrisgeidner.bsky.social · Nov 7
BREAKING: The Sixth Circuit, in a 10-7 en banc decision, holds that an Ohio school district's anti-bullying policy that requires students to use children's preferred pronouns is likely unconstitutional on these facts.

Judge Murphy, a Trump appointee, writes the court's decision.
OPINION MURPHY, Circuit Judge. An Ohio public school district bars its students from referring to transgender and nonbinary classmates using the pronouns that match their biological sex if the classmates prefer to go by different pronouns. The plaintiff in this case has parent and student members who believe that a person's sex is immutable. The members want to express this view by using biological pronouns. And they believe that they would convey a falsehood —that a person's gender is fluid—if they use preferred pronouns. So the plaintiff challenged the school district's speech ban on behalf of its members under the First Amendment's Free Speech Clause. This case about pronouns pits two important interests against each other. On the one hand, the school district has prohibited speech (biological pronouns) that expresses a message on a matter of pressing public concern. And because the district requires other speech (preferred pronouns) that expresses a competing view, it has discriminated based on its students' viewpoints. Its approach thus raises serious free-speech concerns. On the other hand, the school district rightly responds that it has a duty to protect all students- including transgender and nonbinary students— from bullying and harassment. And this protection, while necessarily restricting speech, does not violate the Free Speech Clause. So which of these competing concerns should prevail in this case? The Supreme Court's cases provide a clear answer. A school district may not restrict personal speech on matters of public concern unless the speech would "materially and substantially disrupt" school activities or infringe the legal "rights of others" in the school community. Tinker v. Des Moines Indep. Cmty. Sch. Dist., 393 U.S. 503, 513 (1969). In this case's current posture, the school district has fallen far short of meeting this demanding standard. It introduced no evidence that the use of biological pronouns would disrupt school functions or qualify as harassment under Ohio law. Our society continues to debate whether biological pronouns are appropriate or offensive just as it continues to debate many other issues surrounding transgender rights. The school district may not skew this debate by forcing one side to change the way it conveys its message or by compelling it to express a different view. We thus reverse and remand Case: 23-3630 Document: 253-2 Filed: 11/06/2025 Page: 4 No. 23-3630 Defending Educ. v. Olentangy Loc. Sch. Dist. Bd. of Educ., et al. Page 4 for the entry of an appropriately tailored preliminary injunction barring the district from punishing students for the commonplace use of biological pronouns. Yet nothing we say here forecloses the district from enforcing its anti-harassment policies against the abuse of transgender students just as it enforces those policies against the abuse of all other students.
November 7, 2025 at 4:22 AM
Reposted by Grizz Anarcho-Bear 🏴‍☠️🏳️‍⚧️
erininthemorning.com
The 6th Circuit has been competing to be the most anti-trans circuit in America and is now carving out a right to bully transgender kids.

Despicable.
chrisgeidner.bsky.social Chris Geidner @chrisgeidner.bsky.social · Nov 7
BREAKING: The Sixth Circuit, in a 10-7 en banc decision, holds that an Ohio school district's anti-bullying policy that requires students to use children's preferred pronouns is likely unconstitutional on these facts.

Judge Murphy, a Trump appointee, writes the court's decision.
OPINION MURPHY, Circuit Judge. An Ohio public school district bars its students from referring to transgender and nonbinary classmates using the pronouns that match their biological sex if the classmates prefer to go by different pronouns. The plaintiff in this case has parent and student members who believe that a person's sex is immutable. The members want to express this view by using biological pronouns. And they believe that they would convey a falsehood —that a person's gender is fluid—if they use preferred pronouns. So the plaintiff challenged the school district's speech ban on behalf of its members under the First Amendment's Free Speech Clause. This case about pronouns pits two important interests against each other. On the one hand, the school district has prohibited speech (biological pronouns) that expresses a message on a matter of pressing public concern. And because the district requires other speech (preferred pronouns) that expresses a competing view, it has discriminated based on its students' viewpoints. Its approach thus raises serious free-speech concerns. On the other hand, the school district rightly responds that it has a duty to protect all students- including transgender and nonbinary students— from bullying and harassment. And this protection, while necessarily restricting speech, does not violate the Free Speech Clause. So which of these competing concerns should prevail in this case? The Supreme Court's cases provide a clear answer. A school district may not restrict personal speech on matters of public concern unless the speech would "materially and substantially disrupt" school activities or infringe the legal "rights of others" in the school community. Tinker v. Des Moines Indep. Cmty. Sch. Dist., 393 U.S. 503, 513 (1969). In this case's current posture, the school district has fallen far short of meeting this demanding standard. It introduced no evidence that the use of biological pronouns would disrupt school functions or qualify as harassment under Ohio law. Our society continues to debate whether biological pronouns are appropriate or offensive just as it continues to debate many other issues surrounding transgender rights. The school district may not skew this debate by forcing one side to change the way it conveys its message or by compelling it to express a different view. We thus reverse and remand Case: 23-3630 Document: 253-2 Filed: 11/06/2025 Page: 4 No. 23-3630 Defending Educ. v. Olentangy Loc. Sch. Dist. Bd. of Educ., et al. Page 4 for the entry of an appropriately tailored preliminary injunction barring the district from punishing students for the commonplace use of biological pronouns. Yet nothing we say here forecloses the district from enforcing its anti-harassment policies against the abuse of transgender students just as it enforces those policies against the abuse of all other students.
November 7, 2025 at 3:52 AM
Reposted by Grizz Anarcho-Bear 🏴‍☠️🏳️‍⚧️
mtcstw.com
Shelves full of food no one can afford are the same as empty
November 7, 2025 at 9:16 AM
grizzbearrunt.bsky.social
Block party!!!
esqueer.net Alejandra Caraballo @esqueer.net · Oct 17
Don't engage. Just block. They want to push their rage bait on here. Don't give them the satisfaction.

bsky.app/profile/did:...
October 18, 2025 at 8:16 AM
Reposted by Grizz Anarcho-Bear 🏴‍☠️🏳️‍⚧️
roclgbtqtogether.bsky.social
“Conversion Therapy” is dangerous, devastating, discredited, unethical, pseudo-science, violence, and rooted in bigotry, hatred, and shame. It should remain banned where it already is and get banned everywhere it’s still allowed.
#BanConversionTherapy
October 9, 2025 at 3:38 AM
Reposted by Grizz Anarcho-Bear 🏴‍☠️🏳️‍⚧️
50501-rochester-ny.bsky.social
📣 Rally to support the MELT act! This legislation prohibits the use of masks by law enforcement in the state of New York. October 11 @ 2pm State Senator Cooney's office #meltact #rochesterny #50501rocny #resist #50501
October 6, 2025 at 7:51 PM
Reposted by Grizz Anarcho-Bear 🏴‍☠️🏳️‍⚧️
katelynburns.com
So far there have been zero trans women reported as having visited epsteins pedo island. But lots of people who want you to think trans women are threats to children seemed to have gone there at some point.

Curious...
September 26, 2025 at 6:03 PM
grizzbearrunt.bsky.social
Meta is actively shadowbanning me every day if I share more than 6 posts from others in an hour... im sure it totally doesnt matter what the contents are... surely.. surely they're not trying to keep me from showing what's going on...
September 27, 2025 at 2:48 PM
Reposted by Grizz Anarcho-Bear 🏴‍☠️🏳️‍⚧️
altnps.bsky.social
We’re grateful for everyone who raised their voices. Nexstar and Sinclair have now announced they will end the blackout and resume airing Jimmy Kimmel Live! on their ABC affiliates. Thank you!!! Every day the resistance grows stronger! 💚
September 26, 2025 at 11:00 PM
Reposted by Grizz Anarcho-Bear 🏴‍☠️🏳️‍⚧️
thegodpodcast.com
Sinclair and Nexstar caved, allowing Kimmel’s show to return. Bless everyone who pushed back!
September 26, 2025 at 11:29 PM
Reposted by Grizz Anarcho-Bear 🏴‍☠️🏳️‍⚧️
esqueer.net
The oligarchs are going to make sure they control all the media, that includes video games.
Jared Kushner’s Firm Is Said to Be Part of $50 Billion Buyout of Electronic Arts
www.nytimes.com
September 27, 2025 at 1:01 AM
Reposted by Grizz Anarcho-Bear 🏴‍☠️🏳️‍⚧️
erininthemorning.com
1. Trump has dug in on anti-trans provisions in the shutdown fight this morning, cancelling a meeting with Dems unless they cave on trans people.

His post to Truth Social is a clear indication that Republicans are making targeting trans people a priority.

Subscribe to support our journalism.
Trump Digs In On Anti-Trans Provisions In Shutdown Fight Message
The provisions are becoming a key sticking point in the ongoing fight to keep the government open.
www.erininthemorning.com
September 23, 2025 at 4:05 PM
Reposted by Grizz Anarcho-Bear 🏴‍☠️🏳️‍⚧️
zoandbehold.bsky.social
As a trans woman who is proudly anti-fascist, I'm just wondering if Trump designating me a terrorist TWICE cancels out?

Am I back to upstanding citizen? Or am I a SUPER DUPER terrorist?
September 23, 2025 at 7:01 PM
Reposted by Grizz Anarcho-Bear 🏴‍☠️🏳️‍⚧️
esqueer.net
No amount of better messaging, being nicer on social media, or having modest political goals was ever going to work to stop this backlash because the world's richest and most powerful people have all decided they don't want us to exist.

How do you even fight blatant lies like this?
A screenshot of an X (formerly Twitter) post. At the top, Elon Musk retweets with the comment “Wow” and a link. The embedded post is from the account “End Wokeness,” displaying their profile picture of a bearded figure in front of an American flag with the text “I support the former things.” The tweet reads: “‘Data is transphobic’ Sex offenders per million: Biological women: 3 Biological men: 399 Trans women: 1,016” Across the statistics, a large red stamp-like text reads “False.” Below the post are buttons for “Rate proposed Community Notes” and engagement metrics showing thousands of replies, retweets, and likes.
September 24, 2025 at 12:20 PM
Reposted by Grizz Anarcho-Bear 🏴‍☠️🏳️‍⚧️
karlykingsley.bsky.social
“Liberal bias in broadcasts” is a weird way to say free speech.
Jimmy Kimmel
September 24, 2025 at 12:27 PM
Reposted by Grizz Anarcho-Bear 🏴‍☠️🏳️‍⚧️
atrupar.com
Pritzker: "One of the reasons Trump wants to send troops into cities is bc he wants to be able to take control of the 2026 elections...if they've got troops in cities, & it becomes a kind of norm for people, then it won't be abnormal for them when they're going to vote having troops at ballot boxes"
September 23, 2025 at 1:51 PM
Reposted by Grizz Anarcho-Bear 🏴‍☠️🏳️‍⚧️
kevinmkruse.bsky.social
This is the perfect encapsulation of Trumpism -- because of its obsession with imagery, the White House crew caused a problem but blamed it on other people, leading to MAGA making threats against the United Nations for their own screw up
September 24, 2025 at 12:23 PM
Reposted by Grizz Anarcho-Bear 🏴‍☠️🏳️‍⚧️
erininthemorning.com
1. Republicans are attempting to get the FBI to label trans advocacy as domestic terrorism.

Project 2025's parent org is pushing it.

It would not label all trans people as terrorists, but it would open the door for heavy surveillance and disruption.

Subscribe to support our journalism.
Republicans Push FBI To Designate Trans Advocacy As Violent Extremism. Inside The Project 2025 Organization's Proposal.
On Thursday evening, news emerged that individuals within and outside of Trump administration were pushing to cast trans activists as domestic terrorists. Then, Project 2025 dropped its proposal.
www.erininthemorning.com
September 19, 2025 at 3:23 PM
Reposted by Grizz Anarcho-Bear 🏴‍☠️🏳️‍⚧️
esqueer.net
Heritage Foundation has released an absolutely insane policy proposal to label all trans people as domestic terrorists. It uses completely made up instances of terrorism and made up statistics but facts don't matter to them.

They want us all eradicated.
Page 1: Flyer from The Heritage Foundation Oversight Project titled “Transgender Ideology-Inspired Violent Extremism (TIVE): Background and FAQs on Need for an FBI Domestic Terrorism Designation.” The page defines “Transgender Ideology” and “TIVE,” outlining beliefs allegedly associated with them. It claims such ideology justifies violence against opponents or frames opposition as violence. The text references the alleged assassination of Charlie Kirk, urging the FBI to classify TIVE as domestic terrorism. Page 2: Continuation of flyer with a section titled “Recent Instances of TIVE-Motivated Acts of Domestic Terrorism.” Lists multiple violent events from 2018 to 2025, attributing them to transgender ideology. Includes mugshots of two alleged attackers. Followed by a “Frequently Asked Questions and Key Terms” section, addressing whether transgender people are terrorists, comparing TIVE with “Nihilistic Violent Extremism,” and discussing FBI designations. Page 3: Flyer continues with questions about Antifa and FBI terrorism classifications. States that Antifa and TIVE are separate categories. Lists ways the FBI classifies domestic terrorism and identifies typical characteristics of “TIVEs,” such as targeting Christians, mental illness, and online radicalization. Includes images: a “Trans Antifa” logo, a pink-blue-white-striped slogan image reading “Protect Their Right to Exist,” a photo of Audrey Hale with a firearm, and a close-up of a magazine with the words “Where is your God?” Page 4: Section titled “Terminology Used by TIVE.” Defines terms including cisgender, deadnaming, Gillick competence, misgendering, “Right to Exist,” “Trans genocide,” and a phrase “You either have a live boy or dead girl, you choose.” Each is presented as terminology used in or associated with TIVE. Page layout is text-heavy, no additional graphics.
September 19, 2025 at 1:19 AM
grizzbearrunt.bsky.social
@rockstargames.com mark my words, im canceling my pre-order. We are NOT showing you fucking ID. Go to hell
August 4, 2025 at 2:24 PM
Reposted by Grizz Anarcho-Bear 🏴‍☠️🏳️‍⚧️
zohrankmamdani.bsky.social
In the words of Nelson Mandela: it always seems impossible until it’s done.

My friends, it is done. And you are the ones who did it.

I am honored to be your Democratic nominee for the Mayor of New York City.
Zohran looking out on a victory night crowd.
June 25, 2025 at 5:54 AM