Florian Keusch
floriankeusch.bsky.social
Florian Keusch
@floriankeusch.bsky.social
Austrian in Mannheim; Prof. of Social Data Science & Methodology at U of Mannheim; survey methodologist; (mobile) web surveys; passive mobile data collection
Reposted by Florian Keusch
Reposted by Florian Keusch
Got a great paper on how AI is reshaping public opinion research? Submit it to POQ's special issue on Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Survey Research!

Papers are being reviewed and accepted on a rolling basis starting now – full details here: s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/clarivate-sc...
November 5, 2025 at 10:28 PM
Reposted by Florian Keusch
Attention please‼️ MASS workshop meets up with WEB DATA OPP in Barcelona in 2026😎😎 Join @floriankeusch.bsky.social @peterlugtig.bsky.social #BellaStruminskaya #MelanieRevilla and me. Check out the call⬇️

massworkshop.org
November 5, 2025 at 10:41 AM
Reposted by Florian Keusch
Can AI-generated images work as visual vignettes in survey experiments? I argue yes - and discuss how . in my new @sscratsage.bsky.social paper: doi.org/10.1177/0894...
November 4, 2025 at 11:08 AM
Reposted by Florian Keusch
📣 New Social Data Science doctoral track launching in 2026 at our Center for Doctoral Studies in Social and Behavioral Sciences (CDSS)!
Applications open mid-November 2025.
ℹ️ www.uni-mannheim.de/gess/apply/admission-requirements/for-cdss/
#PhD #DoctoralStudies #DataScience #SocialStudies
GESS expands doctoral programme: New track in social data science to start in 2026 |
www.uni-mannheim.de
November 4, 2025 at 12:00 PM
Reposted by Florian Keusch
@sscratsage.bsky.social received it 1,000th submission today - November 1st. Last year, the journal broke its submission record at 1,020. I wonder what we will do this year?
November 1, 2025 at 11:04 PM
Reposted by Florian Keusch
Interested in understanding #bias in #CSS?

✨Here's our Special Issue editorial in Communication Methods and Measures:

"Critical, but constructive: defining, detecting, and addressing bias in Computational Social Science"

👉 doi.org/10.1080/1931... (with @bachl.bsky.social & Nathan TeBlunthuis)
October 29, 2025 at 3:19 PM
Reposted by Florian Keusch
Ever wondered how to get better survey feedback from respondents? 🧐

👉 Check out our new @jssam.bsky.social paper together with @jkhoehne.bsky.social @jessicakuhlm.bsky.social testing different (1) visual designs and (2) answer formats of #FinalCommentQuestions.

🌐 academic.oup.com/jssam/advanc...
Asking for Feedback: Innovating Final Comment Questions in Self-Administered Web Surveys
Abstract. Web surveys frequently include so-called “final comment questions” (FCQs) to provide respondents the opportunity to express their experiences wit
academic.oup.com
October 29, 2025 at 7:38 AM
Reposted by Florian Keusch
Any experiences with data donation of #Spotify listening history?

I requested to download my full listening history and it said that it would take 30 days to produce the download.

2 hours later I received the link to the zip file with full JSON records.

Any other experiences with this?
October 26, 2025 at 9:00 AM
Reposted by Florian Keusch
New article! About a year ago, I asked ChatGPT 3.5 to calculate the reading level of survey questions. It was totally wrong. And this paper was born! Trent Buskirk and I examine multiple ChatGPT and Claude models for evaluating question reading levels & inputs.

journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/...
“ChatBot” is a Two Syllable Word...Or Is It?: Using Generative AI for Survey Question Readability Assessments - Kristen Olson, Trent D. Buskirk, 2025
Market and survey researchers aim to write survey questions so that the target population can understand them. A common recommendation for general population st...
journals.sagepub.com
October 24, 2025 at 1:58 PM
Reposted by Florian Keusch
"Representative sample" is a flawed, ambiguous concept and it does not have a precise definition in the technical literature of survey sampling, so you should avoid using it at all costs.
/TheEnd
October 22, 2025 at 2:32 PM
Reposted by Florian Keusch
I'm a sampling statistician and a lot of people ask me about "representative samples". Since there is quite some confusion about it, I'm putting here an entire thread with everything you need to know about "representative samples": 🧵 [1/n]
October 22, 2025 at 2:32 PM
Reposted by Florian Keusch
🚨 Upcoming #CS3Meeting 🚨

@wanlo.bsky.social talks about analytic flexibility in silicon samples on October 29, 3:15 to 4:00 PM CET).

Great opportunity to gain novel insights into how survey responses can be generated with #LLMs.

Sign up now: ww3.unipark.de/uc/cs3_meeti...
October 21, 2025 at 7:33 AM
Reposted by Florian Keusch
Thrilled to talk about how seemingly small decisions in silicon sampling can have a large impact on simulated survey responses 👀 Join us on Oct 29th! 👈
🚨 Upcoming #CS3Meeting 🚨

@wanlo.bsky.social talks about analytic flexibility in silicon samples on October 29, 3:15 to 4:00 PM CET).

Great opportunity to gain novel insights into how survey responses can be generated with #LLMs.

Sign up now: ww3.unipark.de/uc/cs3_meeti...
October 21, 2025 at 7:42 AM
Reposted by Florian Keusch
New hobby:

Remaking article abstracts as movie trailers to expose hype and fearmongering.
October 20, 2025 at 10:22 AM
Reposted by Florian Keusch
Job Alert! We are hiring two post-docs (full time, 4+ years) in our project SCEPTIC - Social, Computational and Ethical Premises of Trust and Informational Cohesion with @annanosthoff.bsky.social @guzoch.bsky.social and Prof. Andreas Peters (uol.de/informatik/s...)
October 17, 2025 at 9:15 AM
Reposted by Florian Keusch
Selbstselektion & Mehrfachteilnahme unterminieren Grundlagen seriöser Stichprobenlogik.
Eine nachträgliche Gewichtung kann diese systematischen Verzerrungen nicht kompensieren.
Dass der ORF eine solche Umfrage als inhaltl. Aufhänger nutzt, ist methodisch & journalistisch fragwürdig & enttäuschend.
October 15, 2025 at 7:48 PM
Reposted by Florian Keusch
What a year so far! 915 submissions to @sscratsage.bsky.social as of today. Need to share and amplify the great work being done at the journal as soon as I can. Updating the website and the collections over the next week. Stay tuned!!!
October 9, 2025 at 11:11 PM
Reposted by Florian Keusch
📢One week left to apply!

DZHW is hiring a research associate at the intersection of survey methodology and computer science (Hannover).

Do your PhD in an interdisciplinary setting with excellent supervision.

I'd apply myself if I weren't already on the team🤓

👉 karriere.dzhw.eu/jobposting/b...
Promotionsstelle
karriere.dzhw.eu
October 7, 2025 at 6:54 AM
Reposted by Florian Keusch
If you've any questions please don't hesitate to contact me! Otherwise APPLY APPLY APPY‼️ Looking forward to working with you🤗🤓
📢One week left to apply!

DZHW is hiring a research associate at the intersection of survey methodology and computer science (Hannover).

Do your PhD in an interdisciplinary setting with excellent supervision.

I'd apply myself if I weren't already on the team🤓

👉 karriere.dzhw.eu/jobposting/b...
Promotionsstelle
karriere.dzhw.eu
October 7, 2025 at 7:01 AM
Reposted by Florian Keusch
These companies must be using the same crazy survey provider. What is this?!
October 6, 2025 at 2:15 PM
Had only heard about this from others, but now it happened to me: got a citation alert (from ResearchGate) and found that the paper the authors cite does not exist (at least not in that form). (1/3)
October 2, 2025 at 5:37 PM
Reposted by Florian Keusch
❗️📢 Tue, Oct 7, 10:00-11:00 CET:
Mannheim Research Colloquium on Survey Methods
#MaRCS

Alexandru Cernat (@manchester.ac.uk):

"Estimating Multiple Types of Error Concurrently Using the Multitrait-Multierror (MTME) Approach"

👉 www.mzes.uni-mannheim.de/en/news/even...
1/2
Detail
www.mzes.uni-mannheim.de
September 30, 2025 at 12:54 PM
Reposted by Florian Keusch
Data Donation as a Method to Measure Physical Activity in Older Adults: Cross-Sectional Web Survey Assessing Consent Rates, Donation Success, and Bias
Data Donation as a Method to Measure Physical Activity in Older Adults: Cross-Sectional Web Survey Assessing Consent Rates, Donation Success, and Bias
Background: Accurate measurement of physical activity (PA) is key to identifying determinants of health and developing appropriate interventions. Self-reports of PA (eg, in surveys or diary studies) often suffer from measurement error. Providing study participants with wearable devices that passively track PA reduces reactivity and recall error but participants’ noncompliance and high device costs are problematic. Many older adults now have smartphones that track PA. Based on legal requirements, data controllers (eg, health apps) must provide users with access to their data, and individuals can request and donate these data for research. This user-centric approach provides researchers with access to individual-level data, and it gives users control over what data are shared. Objective: We conduct a first test of the data donation approach for PA data among older adults. We study (1) how willing and successful older adults are to donate their PA data from different smartphone apps, (2) what drives donation of PA data at the different stages of participation, and (3) what biases arise from selective data donation. Methods: To answer our research questions, we use cross-sectional observational data from a probability-based online panel of the Dutch general population. A total of 2086 members of the Longitudinal Internet Studies for the Social Sciences panel aged 50 years and older completed a web survey in 2024. All iPhone and Android smartphone owners were asked to download passively collected PA data from their devices (Apple Health, Google Location History, or Samsung Health) and donate them via the Port platform. Results: Out of the 2086 survey participants, 1889 (91%) reported owning an iPhone or Android phone compatible for data donation, 606 (29%) reported willingness to donate PA data, 354 (17%) started the data donation, and 256 (12%) successfully provided a data package. Gender, age, educational attainment, monthly personal net income, smartphone usage behavior, privacy- and trust-related attitudes, and type of health app from which the data were requested correlated with behavior at the different stages of study participation. Self-reported reasons for nonwillingness to donate related mainly to expected technical issues, privacy concerns, and perceived usefulness. Compared with the entire sample, data donors reported better health, fewer health-related limitations, fewer difficulties performing tasks, and more PA. Conclusions: Our study shows that data donation from smartphones as part of a probability-based web survey of older adults is a feasible alternative for the measurement of PA, especially for iPhone owners younger than 70 years. Limitations relate to nonparticipation which correlates strongly with characteristics of smartphone ownership and comfort with device use. Substantive bias in health and PA outcomes persists for those who donated in comparison with all survey respondents.
dlvr.it
September 26, 2025 at 12:16 PM
Happy to report that our study on "Data Donation as a Method to Measure Physical Activity in Older Adults" was just published in JMIR. www.jmir.org/2025/1/e69799 We asked people aged 50+ in the Dutch #LISS panel to donate physical activity (PA) data from their smartphones. We found that...
September 26, 2025 at 4:03 PM