I'll go through some of the most egregious ones here.
Not good lawyering.
Judge: this witness has zero info about content of info. No shade on you Mr. Cantu. you'v e been very candid with teh court.
R: do you know who would have more info at DOS about sum and substance of your declaration? that we could go talk to.
/34
Not good lawyering.
There are actually THREE versions of document:
The no-billed indictment as originally docketed. (The fucked no-bill.)
storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...
Defense counsel argued that’s a complete bar to further prosecution
Defense counsel argued that’s a complete bar to further prosecution
Then, once she’s assured the ascension of the worst possible candidate, she will sink back into the freezing November soil to the soft tunes of indie folk rock to repeat the cycle
What's Jill Stein doing about the migrants being kidnapped?
Then, once she’s assured the ascension of the worst possible candidate, she will sink back into the freezing November soil to the soft tunes of indie folk rock to repeat the cycle
2/
Just yesterday, a post from the same account claimed it was “false” that the DOJ had identified Shauni Kerkhoff as the suspect.
"Justin, cover your face."
"Justin, cover your face."
“Oompa Loompa doopity dope, who fucked a couch and murdered the pope?”
“Oompa Loompa doopity dope, who fucked a couch and murdered the pope?”
Wouldn't "shielding internal communications" from plaintiffs be illegal?
"OpenAI would be fine if they just destroyed evidence or lied during discovery"
Wouldn't "shielding internal communications" from plaintiffs be illegal?
"OpenAI would be fine if they just destroyed evidence or lied during discovery"