Issues of rights are political, they are moral. Making them a matter of expert consensus cedes ground we can't afford to lose in terms of who gets to make decisions about our lives.

The only way to avoid this is to act to liberate yourself; to not entrust your freedom to any other, but to always see yourself as the ultimate protector and advocate of your own interests.

Solidarity does not mean you put yourself aside, or accept being put aside. We fight together.

This means that the relation between the 'liberator' and the 'liberated' is fundamentally conditional upon the 'liberator' having an interest in maintaining it; rather than becoming liberated, you become a protectorate under the control of your 'liberator'.

The bet of this whole project from the top was that people would basically get behind King Corbyn due to the force of his brand, and that the sects of the organised left might be a labour pool as where else would they be able to go to stay politically relevant? Turns out, as ever, this was bollocks

Which is I suppose the broader issue of the centralization of the internet into themselves almost sort of nation-states. Though I'm not that keen on the notion of 'technofeudalism'.

If I do end up ever producing my own erotic material, pornhub has certainly affirmed itself as not the space for it.

Was it ever to begin with? Is likely answered with no but being one largest platforms -similar to twitch, youtube, etc- it has such mass that it's a singularity in the internet.

This has been your anarchist-wakes-up-too-early-and-is-pissed-off-o-gram. For my next trick I will be furious about the abuse of safer spaces and accountability processes because people don't like being mean to rapists.