Chance
chancetj.bsky.social
Chance
@chancetj.bsky.social
Someone, somewhere
Reposted by Chance
The napping president can’t remember who he pardoned but he calls his predecessor sleepy and accuses him of not knowing who he pardoned.
December 3, 2025 at 5:11 AM
Reposted by Chance
“I wanted bad things to happen to other people, not me.”
- Every trump voter
December 2, 2025 at 10:27 PM
Reposted by Chance
Hegseth is very transparently blaming a Navy admiral for his own decision. Let this be a lesson for every other military officer: The Trump administration will issue unlawful orders, then blame you for following them.
December 2, 2025 at 3:04 AM
Reposted by Chance
Pathetically craven even by FIFA standards
November 6, 2025 at 2:09 AM
Reposted by Chance
basically every 2024 truism is dead. Trump did not build a lasting multiracial coalition or turn young men into committed Republicans. You don’t need to cave on trans rights to win. The pundits have nothing left to tell you.
November 5, 2025 at 1:57 PM
Reposted by Chance
ah, perhaps instead of pumping millions into endless factional infighting Dem donors could invest in making local Dem organizations genuine civic spaces that can reach people during and between elections
Off their phones and into the streets

www.nytimes.com/2025/11/04/n...
November 5, 2025 at 12:49 PM
Reposted by Chance
Endless lies 🤥 - brought to you by corporations who won’t pay a living wage
November 5, 2025 at 2:54 PM
Reposted by Chance
Beshear: Let me be clear. The president has both the funding and the authority to fund snap during a shutdown. In fact, every other president in every other shutdown has done so. People going hungry in this instance is a choice that this president has made.
November 5, 2025 at 4:44 PM
Reposted by Chance
Traditional American politics is premised on the notion that sometimes you lose and sometimes you win and you have to deal with that.

But Trumpism is premised on the notion that any result where you don’t win is illegitimate, unlawful, fraud, criminal.

You can’t negotiate with people like that.
November 5, 2025 at 2:41 AM
Reposted by Chance
Absolutely disgusting response from Turning Point USA's spokesperson here, who targeted some random teachers and rained hell on their lives because he couldn't fathom not trying to squeeze some more engagement bait out of his dead boss.
November 4, 2025 at 10:43 PM
Reposted by Chance
every single conservative commentator complaining about the rise of nick fuentes is responsible for the rise of nick fuentes
November 4, 2025 at 2:27 PM
Reposted by Chance
I actually feel a little sorry for Mike Johnson. Before he became Speaker only a handful of people knew what a smarmy little idiot he was. Now, several hundred million people know.
November 4, 2025 at 3:45 PM
Reposted by Chance
Seems like the guy who threw the sandwich at the federal agent is holding his own in the trial today.
November 4, 2025 at 9:09 PM
Reposted by Chance
Louisiana — the red state that Mike Johnson nominally represents — has the second highest percentage of residents enrolled in SNAP in the nation.

They’re pushing this fantasy about these being “Democrat programs” used only in blue states but that’s a PR fantasy divorced from reality.
Mike Johnson: "These blue states have abused the SNAP program just like they've abused Medicaid and so many other government programs."
November 3, 2025 at 9:23 PM
Reposted by Chance
In a way, I find the authoritarian takeover of our media system even more disturbing than the authoritarian takeover of our political system.

Our political system has been failing basically my entire adult life. But, the media system provided accountability and sort of worked. Now it’s collapsing.
November 3, 2025 at 4:18 PM
Reposted by Chance
it's time for journos to start asking Johnson meta questions

"Speaker, on 5 occasions last week you said 'I haven't seen it' when asked about news events w/big implications for public policy. Do you ever read the news, and do you agree it's problematic for the Speaker to be so woefully uninformed?"
November 3, 2025 at 3:36 PM
Reposted by Chance
I'm also reminded of the "whistleblower" report about abuses at a Missouri gender clinic, the author of which is now just a full-time anti-transgender lobbyist, that fell apart the moment any reporter tried to verify it
perhaps the biggest story TFPever ran was a catastrophically shoddy argument that George Floyd ackshully died of an overdose. When confronted with irrefutable evidence that the piece was simply wrong, Weiss didn’t take it down, she asked her critic, @radleybalko.bsky.social, to come on a podcast.
David Ellison’s note to staff on Paramount’s acquisition of the Free Press
October 6, 2025 at 1:56 PM
Reposted by Chance
It’s amazing how often right-wing “independent journalists” become the story at whatever event they are “covering.”
October 7, 2025 at 12:44 AM
Reposted by Chance
There is a legal argument for district court judges can do universal injunctions, and a legal argument for district court judges can't do universal injunctions.

There is no legal argument for district court judges can when the Supreme Court majority likes the policy outcome but can't if they don't.
June 27, 2025 at 2:31 PM
Reposted by Chance
We’re acting like codependent family members in a home with a mentally unstable patriarch. I don’t mean this as a joke.
Elites aren't even using their existing mechanisms set up to allow deniable messaging. Go look at PhRMA, the big bad lobbying group; they've got nothing to say about their NIH R&D pipeline being destroyed, nor about the worst regression in public health and vaccine acceptance in U.S. history.
“You know what would help a lot? Some elite disapproval—publicly and boldly expressed. While a successful democracy depends on some degree of reasonableness from voters, a successful liberal democracy also depends on responsibility and even courage from elites.”

www.thebulwark.com/p/the-public...
June 27, 2025 at 10:15 PM
Reposted by Chance
If the Supreme Court thinks universal injunctions are unconstitutional, to wait until *now* to say that, in this of all cases, with this of all presidents, is a devastating indictment of both its impartiality and its prudence.
June 27, 2025 at 2:29 PM
Reposted by Chance
One of the problems with trying to argue that Trump is going against his own policies is that Trump doesn’t have any cohesive or coherent policies. He talks in run-on sentences and knows little about anything
June 19, 2025 at 12:40 PM
Reposted by Chance
"Was it really this dumb in 2003" guys they renamed french fries
June 19, 2025 at 2:30 PM
Reposted by Chance
Instructing soldiers not to hoot and clap like they are at a political rally when a president gives a speech is civil-military relations 101.

Any officer should know this without even thinking about it.
“We’re treating it as a teachable moment,” said a senior Army official. “It was not a great look.”

Tonight, a deep dive on how the Army has been embroiled in -- and strained by -- this moment's partisan politics.

www.washingtonpost.com/national-sec...
Political turmoil strains the Army as it marks a milestone birthday
Trump’s rally at Fort Bragg was the latest event that has thrust the Army to the center of his most partisan machinations.
www.washingtonpost.com
June 13, 2025 at 11:29 PM
Reposted by Chance
My favorite #Wisconsin #NoKings sign/flag from today.

#wipolitics
June 15, 2025 at 3:24 AM