Charlotte Sudduth
@casudduth.bsky.social
PhD student at UIUC studying close relationships. Previously UMN & Edinburgh
Reposted by Charlotte Sudduth
Researchers often perceive 'barriers' to practicing #OpenScience, whether it’s publishing open access, sharing data, or pre-registering studies.
Last week at @esc-eurocrim.bsky.social, I presented our work at NSCR identifying 36 such distinct barriers.
Do you recognize them in your own work?
Last week at @esc-eurocrim.bsky.social, I presented our work at NSCR identifying 36 such distinct barriers.
Do you recognize them in your own work?
September 13, 2025 at 3:11 PM
Researchers often perceive 'barriers' to practicing #OpenScience, whether it’s publishing open access, sharing data, or pre-registering studies.
Last week at @esc-eurocrim.bsky.social, I presented our work at NSCR identifying 36 such distinct barriers.
Do you recognize them in your own work?
Last week at @esc-eurocrim.bsky.social, I presented our work at NSCR identifying 36 such distinct barriers.
Do you recognize them in your own work?
Reposted by Charlotte Sudduth
Call for Papers: Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science is calling for proposals for manuscripts that discuss, demonstrate, and work to enhance replicability and reproducibility of methods research in psychology.
Proposals are due by September 15!
Proposals are due by September 15!
<em>AMPPS</em> Call for Papers on Replicability and Reproducibility in Methodological Research
Methodological reform has shaped the last decade of psychological research. Researchers have undertaken replication studies, journals and funders have emphasized registration and data sharing, and aut...
www.psychologicalscience.org
September 12, 2025 at 6:59 PM
Call for Papers: Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science is calling for proposals for manuscripts that discuss, demonstrate, and work to enhance replicability and reproducibility of methods research in psychology.
Proposals are due by September 15!
Proposals are due by September 15!
Reposted by Charlotte Sudduth
Today, our article "The entities enabling scientific fraud at scale are large, resilient, and growing rapidly" is finally published in PNAS. I hope that it proves to be a wake-up-call for the whole scientific community.
reeserichardson.blog/2025/08/04/a...
reeserichardson.blog/2025/08/04/a...
A do-or-die moment for the scientific enterprise
Reflecting on our paper “The entities enabling scientific fraud at scale are large, resilient, and growing rapidly”
reeserichardson.blog
August 4, 2025 at 8:47 PM
Today, our article "The entities enabling scientific fraud at scale are large, resilient, and growing rapidly" is finally published in PNAS. I hope that it proves to be a wake-up-call for the whole scientific community.
reeserichardson.blog/2025/08/04/a...
reeserichardson.blog/2025/08/04/a...
Reposted by Charlotte Sudduth
The Love Consortium Statistics Decision Tree launched today! Think of it like a choose-your-own adventure guide to help you identify the best analyses for your specific dataset and research question.
theloveconsortium.org/so/9fPWyVE6Z...
#DataScience #Statistics
theloveconsortium.org/so/9fPWyVE6Z...
#DataScience #Statistics
LinkedIn
This link will take you to a page that’s not on LinkedIn
lnkd.in
July 24, 2025 at 3:01 PM
The Love Consortium Statistics Decision Tree launched today! Think of it like a choose-your-own adventure guide to help you identify the best analyses for your specific dataset and research question.
theloveconsortium.org/so/9fPWyVE6Z...
#DataScience #Statistics
theloveconsortium.org/so/9fPWyVE6Z...
#DataScience #Statistics
Reposted by Charlotte Sudduth
Finally got this banger of a title out: 𝑆𝑜𝑚𝑒𝑡𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑠, 𝑎 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑝𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒 𝑓𝑖𝑔𝑢𝑟𝑒 𝑖𝑠 𝑤𝑜𝑟𝑡ℎ 𝑚𝑜𝑟𝑒 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑛 𝑎 𝑡ℎ𝑜𝑢𝑠𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑚𝑜𝑑𝑒𝑙 𝑐𝑜𝑒𝑓𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑠.
If your descriptive figures and your model tell different stories, trust the figure. (And maybe rethink the model.)
👉 📄 www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10....
If your descriptive figures and your model tell different stories, trust the figure. (And maybe rethink the model.)
👉 📄 www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10....
Sometimes, a descriptive figure is worth more than a thousand model coefficients: the importance of data description in social research
Many social research questions aim at understanding relationships between different phenomena, and increasingly complex multivariate statistical models are often employed to address these questions...
www.tandfonline.com
July 24, 2025 at 4:42 PM
Finally got this banger of a title out: 𝑆𝑜𝑚𝑒𝑡𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑠, 𝑎 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑝𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒 𝑓𝑖𝑔𝑢𝑟𝑒 𝑖𝑠 𝑤𝑜𝑟𝑡ℎ 𝑚𝑜𝑟𝑒 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑛 𝑎 𝑡ℎ𝑜𝑢𝑠𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑚𝑜𝑑𝑒𝑙 𝑐𝑜𝑒𝑓𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑠.
If your descriptive figures and your model tell different stories, trust the figure. (And maybe rethink the model.)
👉 📄 www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10....
If your descriptive figures and your model tell different stories, trust the figure. (And maybe rethink the model.)
👉 📄 www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10....
Reposted by Charlotte Sudduth
Socioeconomic Status in Social Interactions
"Low-SES individuals exhibited greater attunement to others and elicited greater comfort in others than high-SES individuals, but impressions were formed in line with homophily effects."
doi.org/10.1177/0956...
#SocialPsyc #Sociology
"Low-SES individuals exhibited greater attunement to others and elicited greater comfort in others than high-SES individuals, but impressions were formed in line with homophily effects."
doi.org/10.1177/0956...
#SocialPsyc #Sociology
July 20, 2025 at 12:14 PM
Socioeconomic Status in Social Interactions
"Low-SES individuals exhibited greater attunement to others and elicited greater comfort in others than high-SES individuals, but impressions were formed in line with homophily effects."
doi.org/10.1177/0956...
#SocialPsyc #Sociology
"Low-SES individuals exhibited greater attunement to others and elicited greater comfort in others than high-SES individuals, but impressions were formed in line with homophily effects."
doi.org/10.1177/0956...
#SocialPsyc #Sociology
Reposted by Charlotte Sudduth
every year my lab does a re-read + edit of our Handbook, a documentation resource for how we do science
this year we also updated our Public Handbook, an open-access version for folks wanting to improve their own docs
it's at handbook-public.themusiclab.org and available for noncommercial re-use
this year we also updated our Public Handbook, an open-access version for folks wanting to improve their own docs
it's at handbook-public.themusiclab.org and available for noncommercial re-use
June 23, 2025 at 1:33 AM
every year my lab does a re-read + edit of our Handbook, a documentation resource for how we do science
this year we also updated our Public Handbook, an open-access version for folks wanting to improve their own docs
it's at handbook-public.themusiclab.org and available for noncommercial re-use
this year we also updated our Public Handbook, an open-access version for folks wanting to improve their own docs
it's at handbook-public.themusiclab.org and available for noncommercial re-use
Reposted by Charlotte Sudduth
NSF grant terminations are disproportionately affecting underrepresented scientists. 58% of canceled grants have women PIs, despite making up only 34% of awards. 17% of canceled grants have Black PIs (versus 4% of the pool). Hispanic and disabled PIs are twice as likely to have NSF grants canceled.
Trump officials take steps toward a radically different NSF
Efforts to shrink staff, budget, and focus have alarmed members of Congress
www.science.org
May 14, 2025 at 3:31 PM
NSF grant terminations are disproportionately affecting underrepresented scientists. 58% of canceled grants have women PIs, despite making up only 34% of awards. 17% of canceled grants have Black PIs (versus 4% of the pool). Hispanic and disabled PIs are twice as likely to have NSF grants canceled.
Reposted by Charlotte Sudduth
Don’t BE the documentation
May 13, 2025 at 11:19 PM
Don’t BE the documentation
Reposted by Charlotte Sudduth
COMPARE: the results of fighting back to the results of not fighting back
April 10, 2025 at 11:11 PM
COMPARE: the results of fighting back to the results of not fighting back
Reposted by Charlotte Sudduth
HEY APA! Didn’t you know that the first rule of fighting tyranny is DO NOT OBEY IN ADVANCE?! So why the fuck are you obeying in advance?!??
www.nytimes.com/2025/03/27/h...
www.nytimes.com/2025/03/27/h...
Under Pressure, Psychology Accreditation Board Suspends Diversity Standards (Gift Article)
As the Trump administration threatens to strip accrediting bodies of their power, many are scrambling to purge diversity requirements.
www.nytimes.com
March 28, 2025 at 1:52 AM
HEY APA! Didn’t you know that the first rule of fighting tyranny is DO NOT OBEY IN ADVANCE?! So why the fuck are you obeying in advance?!??
www.nytimes.com/2025/03/27/h...
www.nytimes.com/2025/03/27/h...
Reposted by Charlotte Sudduth
Massive team work in replicating papers and cross checking samples and treatments across multiple papers — what a massive undertaking!
This is evidence that journals *must* require data and code sharing.
I’m wondering if anything in the peer review process could have prevented this
This is evidence that journals *must* require data and code sharing.
I’m wondering if anything in the peer review process could have prevented this
After being alerted about possible misconduct, the I4R are reproducing published papers that use data from a specific NGO (GDRI). This thread releases the first 2 reports and provides more information about the work and responses/statements from authors journals and journals. 🧵
February 24, 2025 at 7:37 PM
Massive team work in replicating papers and cross checking samples and treatments across multiple papers — what a massive undertaking!
This is evidence that journals *must* require data and code sharing.
I’m wondering if anything in the peer review process could have prevented this
This is evidence that journals *must* require data and code sharing.
I’m wondering if anything in the peer review process could have prevented this
Reposted by Charlotte Sudduth
going to SPSP this week
February 17, 2025 at 4:16 AM
going to SPSP this week
Reposted by Charlotte Sudduth
I find it hilarious that the Interpersonal Relations and Group Processes section of JPSP--ostensibly a "premier outlet"--cannot fill its page allocation. The rest of the editorial is all about how every paper must meet a high bar for "theoretical innovation." Good times. doi.org/10.1037/pspi...
February 14, 2025 at 3:11 PM
I find it hilarious that the Interpersonal Relations and Group Processes section of JPSP--ostensibly a "premier outlet"--cannot fill its page allocation. The rest of the editorial is all about how every paper must meet a high bar for "theoretical innovation." Good times. doi.org/10.1037/pspi...
Reposted by Charlotte Sudduth
Investigating fraud and errors in health research is obviously laudable. But we need to maintain high methodological standards. That means scrutinising each others’ work, and calling each other out when we err. There are so many errors in error detection. A few recurring errors:
February 7, 2025 at 4:05 PM
Investigating fraud and errors in health research is obviously laudable. But we need to maintain high methodological standards. That means scrutinising each others’ work, and calling each other out when we err. There are so many errors in error detection. A few recurring errors:
Reposted by Charlotte Sudduth
In a new paper, my colleagues and I argue that it's time for relationship science to have its own credibility revolution.
osf.io/preprints/os...
Coauthored with @davekhera.bsky.social and @pauleastwick.bsky.social
osf.io/preprints/os...
Coauthored with @davekhera.bsky.social and @pauleastwick.bsky.social
OSF
osf.io
February 5, 2025 at 3:54 PM
In a new paper, my colleagues and I argue that it's time for relationship science to have its own credibility revolution.
osf.io/preprints/os...
Coauthored with @davekhera.bsky.social and @pauleastwick.bsky.social
osf.io/preprints/os...
Coauthored with @davekhera.bsky.social and @pauleastwick.bsky.social
Reposted by Charlotte Sudduth
no funding if it seems like the research MIGHT involve a woman or a nonwhite person
🚨BREAKING. From a program officer at the National Science Foundation, a list of keywords that can cause a grant to be pulled. I will be sharing screenshots of these keywords along with a decision tree. Please share widely. This is a crisis for academic freedom & science.
February 4, 2025 at 2:34 AM
no funding if it seems like the research MIGHT involve a woman or a nonwhite person
Reposted by Charlotte Sudduth
Asking PIs about their stats is like
I Want To Fly A Helicopter, Not Look At A Bunch Of Crazy Dials
theonion.com/i-want-...
theonion.com/i-want-...
January 15, 2025 at 10:22 PM
Asking PIs about their stats is like
Reposted by Charlotte Sudduth
Idk why people freak out about the tik tok ban when you can just post videos using R.
January 15, 2025 at 11:27 PM
Idk why people freak out about the tik tok ban when you can just post videos using R.
Reposted by Charlotte Sudduth
The brand new `legendry` package by @teunbrand.bsky.social takes ggplots2 guides to the next level 🤩
teunbrand.github.io/teunbrand_bl...
teunbrand.github.io/teunbrand_bl...
November 22, 2024 at 3:44 AM
The brand new `legendry` package by @teunbrand.bsky.social takes ggplots2 guides to the next level 🤩
teunbrand.github.io/teunbrand_bl...
teunbrand.github.io/teunbrand_bl...