boogie1444.bsky.social
@boogie1444.bsky.social
Reposted
Abysmal, mindless, utterly zombified. You can't even call it policymaking because that implies a degree of thought which simply isn't present. Pretty soon they might actually hit Cameron's 'tens of thousands' target and then they'll shit themselves with horror at the consequences.
PM describes net migration of 205k as "a step in the right direction". His govt has no public position on a sustainable level of immigration is, nor any known process to decide what, why & how. Starmer is now implying he wants it significantly lower
www.standard.co.uk/news/politic...
Net migration drop ‘step in the right direction’ – Starmer
Net migration peaked at a record 944,000 in the year to March 2023 but has fallen sharply since then.
www.standard.co.uk
November 27, 2025 at 4:46 PM
Reposted
Regular reminder that behind all the guff about immigration statistics we are talking about actual people's lives.
We are pretty much guaranteed to see today's figures used to defend anti-immigration policies, and ignore the harm they cause. These are people's lives.
www.bigissue.com/opinion/uk-m...
UK migration is at a record high – but immigration should be celebrated, not weaponised
Experience tells us that there will be those who try and “weaponise” immigration no matter what, says Stand for All's Daniel Sohege.
www.bigissue.com
November 27, 2025 at 10:10 AM
Reposted
'This isn't an opinion. This is counting.'
- A 100,000 drop in net migration costs us £7bn
- Scrapping the two-child benefit cap costs us £3bn

What gets more attention?

James O’Brien says 'we have become a ludicrous country'.
November 27, 2025 at 11:29 AM
Reposted
Time to look at the initial decision backlog. This has continued to decrease, but this can't be considered in isolation. As above - increased decision making combined w/ increased refusal rate & poor quality decisions means that cases are simply shifted into the appeals backlog in the tribunal.
November 27, 2025 at 10:28 AM
Reposted
Concerning to see grant rate for Afghan nationals dropping to 36%. UK is (rightly) not forcibly returning these people so what is the plan?

Quickly checking the returns data - 3 people were returned to Afghanistan in Q3 2025 (July to Sept)
November 27, 2025 at 9:49 AM
Reposted
Let's start by looking at the asylum grant rate. This has dropped from 54% in y/e Sept 2024 to 45%. A large proportion of these refusals will be unlawful due to poor decision making by the Home Office.

www.gov.uk/government/s...
November 27, 2025 at 9:40 AM
Reposted
Today's migration stats illustrate the migration doom loop in action...

(from my presentation at the IMF last week)
November 27, 2025 at 11:02 AM
Reposted
This emotional argument is Always employed when people make suggestions about elderly people downsizing from houses they can't really afford but I don't think they realise how many u-40s can't relate at all to the idea of having a home they could stay in for the rest of their life
November 27, 2025 at 7:38 AM
Reposted
And in a lot of ways it also reflects the standard of British politics – in which the aim is not to improve people's lives, but to make the lives of people you don't like for arbitrary reasons, worse and more miserable
November 27, 2025 at 11:25 AM
Reposted
This is similar nonsense to how the Trump admin talks about addressing historic backlogs in the immigration courts.

The solution to backlogs are to hire more judges and staff, not to abolish due process. It’s not that hard!
November 25, 2025 at 7:15 PM
Reposted
Juries are not perfect.

Many of the worst miscarriages of justice have followed jury trials.

But the merit of juries is not so much the power they have, but the power they prevent others from having.

They mean a judge cannot just nod-along with prosecution evidence and give a guilty verdict.
November 25, 2025 at 7:12 PM
Having done jury service, I think it's extremely important we keep them as much as possible. Even if they're not the most heinous of crimes.
November 25, 2025 at 7:13 PM
Reposted
Complaint just made to BBC including: "Please explain who made the editorial cut. What was the reason for the cut? Was there any input to this decision from UK Government? Is the BBC scared of Donald Trump?"
I wish I didn’t have to share this. But the BBC has decided to censor my first Reith Lecture.

They deleted the line in which I describe Donald Trump as “the most openly corrupt president in American history.” /1
November 25, 2025 at 10:24 AM
Reposted
I share this with respect for the many excellent journalists at the BBC.

And with the hope that transparency helps strengthen, not weaken, our democratic culture. /5
November 25, 2025 at 9:26 AM
Reposted
It’s especially ironic because the lecture is exactly about the ‘paralyzing cowardice’ of today’s elites.

About universities, corporations and media networks bending the knee to authoritarianism. /4
November 25, 2025 at 9:26 AM
Reposted
This has happened against my wishes, and I’m genuinely dismayed by it.

Not because people can’t disagree with my words, but because self-censorship driven by fear (Trump threatening to sue the BBC) should concern all of us. /3
November 25, 2025 at 9:26 AM
Reposted
This sentence was taken out of a lecture they commissioned, reviewed through the full editorial process, and recorded four weeks ago in front of 500 people in the BBC Radio Theatre.

I was told the decision came from the highest levels within the BBC. /2
November 25, 2025 at 9:26 AM
Reposted
I wish I didn’t have to share this. But the BBC has decided to censor my first Reith Lecture.

They deleted the line in which I describe Donald Trump as “the most openly corrupt president in American history.” /1
November 25, 2025 at 9:26 AM
Reposted
“They are not ready in 28 days to find a private rented home, pay a deposit, pay bills, be working," said Polly Stephens, head of policy at New Horizon. "It’s impossible for them. They end up at services like ours [with] no idea what they’re supposed to do next.”
national.thelead.uk/p/new-asylum...
New asylum policies making homeless refugees “targets for the far right”
Labour’s abrupt return to the 28-day move-on period is pushing vulnerable people into rough sleeping and exposing them to fraud and abuse.
national.thelead.uk
November 25, 2025 at 1:26 PM
Reposted
In America they arrest you if you tell someone else not to commit a crime
November 25, 2025 at 6:34 PM
Reposted
NEW: Civil rights and weapons experts cite the consequences of federal agents’ use of crowd control weapons: religious leaders shot with pepper balls and noxious chemicals. A nurse nearly blinded by tear gas. Protestors trapped, struggling to breathe.

With @frontlinepbs.bsky.social
Trump’s Immigration Forces Deploy “Less Lethal” Weapons in Dangerous Ways, Skirting Rules and Maiming Protesters
Civil rights and weapons experts cite the consequences of federal agents’ use of crowd control weapons: religious leaders shot with pepper balls and noxious chemicals. A nurse nearly blinded by tear g...
www.propublica.org
November 25, 2025 at 6:36 PM
You'll see Labour doing some good things. Remember, the Greens would do the same without the xenophobia/racism.
November 25, 2025 at 6:58 PM
You'll see Labour doing some good things. Remember, the Greens would do the same without the xenophobia/racism.
November 25, 2025 at 6:45 PM