Bob Starr
@bobstarr.xyz
Gen X nerd from 🇨🇦 • Twitter to Mastodon to Threads to Bluesky transplant • Here to share commentary* and stuff I find online.
*Nerd opinions are not those of my employer.
*Nerd opinions are not those of my employer.
Exactly. Besides, the Bond films have always had a bit of a floating timeline that writers use as needed. George Lazenby's Bond got married, Never Say Never Again isn't even canon to the rest of the series. The best thing to do is a soft reboot to begin anew.
November 11, 2025 at 1:45 PM
Exactly. Besides, the Bond films have always had a bit of a floating timeline that writers use as needed. George Lazenby's Bond got married, Never Say Never Again isn't even canon to the rest of the series. The best thing to do is a soft reboot to begin anew.
Is this our consolation prize for Apple completely dropping the ball on AI?
November 11, 2025 at 12:33 PM
Is this our consolation prize for Apple completely dropping the ball on AI?
Excellent point. I'll adjust my unit of measure going forward.
November 10, 2025 at 10:01 AM
Excellent point. I'll adjust my unit of measure going forward.
You're right. I have no idea how an editor would let this headline go out (other than they want to intentionally lean right).
November 10, 2025 at 3:56 AM
You're right. I have no idea how an editor would let this headline go out (other than they want to intentionally lean right).
Reposted by Bob Starr
I am aware Schumer voted no. But he likely started the ball rolling in the 1st place and recruited senators over 60 who aren't up for re-election (with the exception of Fetterman), then voted no for optics. And if he didn't do this, he failed as a leader by allowing it to happen. GET LOST SCHUMER
November 10, 2025 at 3:36 AM
I am aware Schumer voted no. But he likely started the ball rolling in the 1st place and recruited senators over 60 who aren't up for re-election (with the exception of Fetterman), then voted no for optics. And if he didn't do this, he failed as a leader by allowing it to happen. GET LOST SCHUMER
This is exactly it. No further discussion needed.
November 10, 2025 at 3:50 AM
This is exactly it. No further discussion needed.
Further, stop writing headlines like this. It's not even a headline, just a Republican talking point that benedits the right. Do better, Axios!
November 10, 2025 at 3:49 AM
Further, stop writing headlines like this. It's not even a headline, just a Republican talking point that benedits the right. Do better, Axios!
Reposted by Bob Starr
A marketplace no one can afford is not a marketplace at all.
November 10, 2025 at 3:38 AM
A marketplace no one can afford is not a marketplace at all.
He must have a template for this type of post by now.
November 10, 2025 at 3:00 AM
He must have a template for this type of post by now.
All this... and don't take PAC/corporate money
November 10, 2025 at 2:57 AM
All this... and don't take PAC/corporate money