⛔no auto follow-backs⛔
NSFW content 🔞
🇵🇱 PL/EN | She/They | Bi disaster | 29 | ❤🐺 @boofwoofgoof.bsky.social
Streams: twitch.tv/ylthin96
Art tag: #ylthindoesart
Fic tag: #ylthinwritesbad
WF: Ylthin96
LIBERALS: the commies are sooo mad about their hero
COMMUNISTS: the anarchists are sooo mad about their hero
ANARCHISTS: we're sooo mad anyone thinks we like chomsky. sucks for the linguists though
LINGUISTS: lmao
LIBERALS: the commies are sooo mad about their hero
COMMUNISTS: the anarchists are sooo mad about their hero
ANARCHISTS: we're sooo mad anyone thinks we like chomsky. sucks for the linguists though
LINGUISTS: lmao
I think I have the concept for one of the three characters of this idea pretty much locked in.
And it was an excuse to draw directly with a ballpoint pen.
I think I have the concept for one of the three characters of this idea pretty much locked in.
And it was an excuse to draw directly with a ballpoint pen.
-
generally what we learn from both RWers & democrats is that rape is a meaningless gotcha to sling at your political enemies and cover up as an embarrassing indiscretion (or discredit the victim as a lying bitch) when your own guy does it. in the end no one actually thinks it's a real issue
-
generally what we learn from both RWers & democrats is that rape is a meaningless gotcha to sling at your political enemies and cover up as an embarrassing indiscretion (or discredit the victim as a lying bitch) when your own guy does it. in the end no one actually thinks it's a real issue
-
remember folks. one woman's word is automatically worth less than one man's. one accuser is never enough. a man must rape his way through a statistically significant population before ant woman's testimony becomes worth considering as evidence.
-
remember folks. one woman's word is automatically worth less than one man's. one accuser is never enough. a man must rape his way through a statistically significant population before ant woman's testimony becomes worth considering as evidence.
Which could have major implications for mail in voting — it’s a clever way to disenfranchise voters that’s going largely overlooked