Tobias Dienlin
@tobiasdienlin.com
Media Psychology & Communication | Privacy & Well-Being | Open Science & Slow Science | IKMZ & University of Zurich | https://tobiasdienlin.com
Pinned
Tobias Dienlin
@tobiasdienlin.com
· Nov 20
That’s also a nice visualization. Just wondered, perhaps also add CIs for significance testing?
February 10, 2026 at 11:46 AM
That’s also a nice visualization. Just wondered, perhaps also add CIs for significance testing?
Reposted by Tobias Dienlin
New preprint! 🎉
Led by @heeminkang.bsky.social, we found that a brief teaching intervention (20 min lecture + student activity) improved some aspects open science knowledge and attitudes in students taking an undergrad health psych course osf.io/preprints/ps...
Led by @heeminkang.bsky.social, we found that a brief teaching intervention (20 min lecture + student activity) improved some aspects open science knowledge and attitudes in students taking an undergrad health psych course osf.io/preprints/ps...
February 10, 2026 at 11:27 AM
New preprint! 🎉
Led by @heeminkang.bsky.social, we found that a brief teaching intervention (20 min lecture + student activity) improved some aspects open science knowledge and attitudes in students taking an undergrad health psych course osf.io/preprints/ps...
Led by @heeminkang.bsky.social, we found that a brief teaching intervention (20 min lecture + student activity) improved some aspects open science knowledge and attitudes in students taking an undergrad health psych course osf.io/preprints/ps...
Monday next week, 5 pm, I’ll deliver my UZH inaugural lecture. Title:
„Ban, improve, or ignore? Social Media Regulation from a Communication Research Perspective“
The talk is open to the public: you can join either on-site or via live-stream. Details, see:
www.uzh.ch/de/events/ag...
„Ban, improve, or ignore? Social Media Regulation from a Communication Research Perspective“
The talk is open to the public: you can join either on-site or via live-stream. Details, see:
www.uzh.ch/de/events/ag...
Aktuelle Veranstaltungen
www.uzh.ch
February 9, 2026 at 8:21 AM
Monday next week, 5 pm, I’ll deliver my UZH inaugural lecture. Title:
„Ban, improve, or ignore? Social Media Regulation from a Communication Research Perspective“
The talk is open to the public: you can join either on-site or via live-stream. Details, see:
www.uzh.ch/de/events/ag...
„Ban, improve, or ignore? Social Media Regulation from a Communication Research Perspective“
The talk is open to the public: you can join either on-site or via live-stream. Details, see:
www.uzh.ch/de/events/ag...
Reposted by Tobias Dienlin
dplyr 1.2.0 is out now and we are SO excited!
- `filter_out()` for dropping rows
- `recode_values()`, `replace_values()`, and `replace_when()` that join `case_when()` as a complete family of recoding/replacing tools
These are huge quality of life wins for #rstats!
tidyverse.org/blog/2026/02...
- `filter_out()` for dropping rows
- `recode_values()`, `replace_values()`, and `replace_when()` that join `case_when()` as a complete family of recoding/replacing tools
These are huge quality of life wins for #rstats!
tidyverse.org/blog/2026/02...
dplyr 1.2.0
dplyr 1.2.0 fills in some important gaps in dplyr's API: we've added a new complement to `filter()` focused on dropping rows, and we've expanded the `case_when()` family with three new recoding and re...
tidyverse.org
February 4, 2026 at 11:39 AM
dplyr 1.2.0 is out now and we are SO excited!
- `filter_out()` for dropping rows
- `recode_values()`, `replace_values()`, and `replace_when()` that join `case_when()` as a complete family of recoding/replacing tools
These are huge quality of life wins for #rstats!
tidyverse.org/blog/2026/02...
- `filter_out()` for dropping rows
- `recode_values()`, `replace_values()`, and `replace_when()` that join `case_when()` as a complete family of recoding/replacing tools
These are huge quality of life wins for #rstats!
tidyverse.org/blog/2026/02...
😮💨
100% agree with your frustration and your post; just want to highlight that, of the "data request" studies (like Gabelica et al), 50% have no open data but promise to share it upon request...
February 3, 2026 at 6:46 PM
😮💨
Reposted by Tobias Dienlin
Yesterday, five-year-old Liam and his dad Adrian were released from Dilley detention center. I picked them up last night and escorted them back to Minnesota this morning.
Liam is now home. With his hat and his backpack.
Liam is now home. With his hat and his backpack.
February 1, 2026 at 3:49 PM
Yesterday, five-year-old Liam and his dad Adrian were released from Dilley detention center. I picked them up last night and escorted them back to Minnesota this morning.
Liam is now home. With his hat and his backpack.
Liam is now home. With his hat and his backpack.
In der Schweiz scheint mir das übrigens sogar noch gängiger als in Ö und De.
Wurde letztens sogar mal angerufen mit einer solchen Anfrage.
Wurde letztens sogar mal angerufen mit einer solchen Anfrage.
February 2, 2026 at 7:38 PM
In der Schweiz scheint mir das übrigens sogar noch gängiger als in Ö und De.
Wurde letztens sogar mal angerufen mit einer solchen Anfrage.
Wurde letztens sogar mal angerufen mit einer solchen Anfrage.
💯 hier meine Standardantwort
February 2, 2026 at 7:36 PM
💯 hier meine Standardantwort
Reposted by Tobias Dienlin
New review paper led by @lucyfoulkes.bsky.social: Mental health awareness campaigns reduce stigma but can also lead to problematic self-diagnosis and symptom misinterpretation. These trade-offs matter, especially for adolescents.
www.nature.com/articles/s44...
www.nature.com/articles/s44...
The psychological consequences of mental health awareness efforts - Nature Reviews Psychology
Mental health awareness campaigns aim to decrease stigma, increase help-seeking and improve mental health literacy. However, they might also negatively impact how individuals interpret, label and resp...
www.nature.com
February 2, 2026 at 1:03 AM
New review paper led by @lucyfoulkes.bsky.social: Mental health awareness campaigns reduce stigma but can also lead to problematic self-diagnosis and symptom misinterpretation. These trade-offs matter, especially for adolescents.
www.nature.com/articles/s44...
www.nature.com/articles/s44...
Reposted by Tobias Dienlin
@scientificdiscovery.dev Hi, I am creating a new version of my free online MOOC, and would like to use this picture, of which you have the copyright. Is it ok if I put it in a slide?
February 2, 2026 at 6:18 AM
@scientificdiscovery.dev Hi, I am creating a new version of my free online MOOC, and would like to use this picture, of which you have the copyright. Is it ok if I put it in a slide?
If you want to follow our project, you can subscribe to our newsletter here. You’ll get three insights every three months
promiseproject.univie.ac.at/news
promiseproject.univie.ac.at/news
January 31, 2026 at 8:32 PM
If you want to follow our project, you can subscribe to our newsletter here. You’ll get three insights every three months
promiseproject.univie.ac.at/news
promiseproject.univie.ac.at/news
😮💨
January 28, 2026 at 9:18 PM
😮💨
AI chatbots are a completely new online entity people now routinely interact with. Many users even form close emotional bonds. How can we make sense of this?
In the AI-Relationship Process Framework (AI-RP), we try to capture the most relevant aspects of this new phenomenon.
Feedback welcome!
In the AI-Relationship Process Framework (AI-RP), we try to capture the most relevant aspects of this new phenomenon.
Feedback welcome!
We are facing a transformative phenomenon in digital space: AI chatbots.
Are they perceived as social beings...or just machines? How does that shape how we chat—and whether we end up bonding with them?
We tackle these questions with the AI Relationship Process Framework: arxiv.org/abs/2601.17351
Are they perceived as social beings...or just machines? How does that shape how we chat—and whether we end up bonding with them?
We tackle these questions with the AI Relationship Process Framework: arxiv.org/abs/2601.17351
January 28, 2026 at 4:20 PM
AI chatbots are a completely new online entity people now routinely interact with. Many users even form close emotional bonds. How can we make sense of this?
In the AI-Relationship Process Framework (AI-RP), we try to capture the most relevant aspects of this new phenomenon.
Feedback welcome!
In the AI-Relationship Process Framework (AI-RP), we try to capture the most relevant aspects of this new phenomenon.
Feedback welcome!
Very much looking forward to reading this 🍿
Our preprint has evolved!
v2 of “Digital Behaviourism” is out now with a new title, new co-authors, and a deeper dive into the behavioural concepts that shape our online lives.
It’s time to move beyond “screen time” and focus on function of online behaviours.
osf.io/preprints/ps...
v2 of “Digital Behaviourism” is out now with a new title, new co-authors, and a deeper dive into the behavioural concepts that shape our online lives.
It’s time to move beyond “screen time” and focus on function of online behaviours.
osf.io/preprints/ps...
January 27, 2026 at 10:09 AM
Very much looking forward to reading this 🍿
Reposted by Tobias Dienlin
The Iowa Gambling Task is an extreme example of Jingle Fallacy and schmeasurement.
In 100 articles we found 244 different ways of scoring it, 177 were never reused. Correlations between them range -.99 to .99.
At the same time, we show meta-analyses combine these results as if they’re equivalent.
In 100 articles we found 244 different ways of scoring it, 177 were never reused. Correlations between them range -.99 to .99.
At the same time, we show meta-analyses combine these results as if they’re equivalent.
How many versions of the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT) exist? And how much does this affect research using the IGT? More than you might think. 🧵
Methodological Flexibility in the Iowa Gambling Task Undermines Interpretability: A Meta-method Review: https://osf.io/4g3vr
January 25, 2026 at 12:01 PM
The Iowa Gambling Task is an extreme example of Jingle Fallacy and schmeasurement.
In 100 articles we found 244 different ways of scoring it, 177 were never reused. Correlations between them range -.99 to .99.
At the same time, we show meta-analyses combine these results as if they’re equivalent.
In 100 articles we found 244 different ways of scoring it, 177 were never reused. Correlations between them range -.99 to .99.
At the same time, we show meta-analyses combine these results as if they’re equivalent.
Reposted by Tobias Dienlin
To help our @ikmz.bsky.social students write their master thesis, we developed a guide with tips and tricks. If you're interested, you can download it here👇
drive.switch.ch/index.php/s/...
Feel free to reuse it or provide feedback!
drive.switch.ch/index.php/s/...
Feel free to reuse it or provide feedback!
January 24, 2026 at 2:07 PM
To help our @ikmz.bsky.social students write their master thesis, we developed a guide with tips and tricks. If you're interested, you can download it here👇
drive.switch.ch/index.php/s/...
Feel free to reuse it or provide feedback!
drive.switch.ch/index.php/s/...
Feel free to reuse it or provide feedback!
So cool!
I made a mistake: A researcher who re-used our dataset noticed an inconsistency. We corrected multiple errors and requested a correction at the journal.
- Article: doi.org/10.5964/ejop...
- Corrected version: osf.io/sz5b9/files/...
Luckily, none of the conclusions were affected.
- Article: doi.org/10.5964/ejop...
- Corrected version: osf.io/sz5b9/files/...
Luckily, none of the conclusions were affected.
January 23, 2026 at 2:51 PM
So cool!
Reposted by Tobias Dienlin
Short announcement before the data get too old: ccsmainz.github.io/platformnews/. With 571 news outlets on TikTok, YouTube Shorts, and Instagram across 46 countries, matching the @reutersinstitute.bsky.social DNR. Computational analyses on topics, platformization, diversity, etc. Feedback welcome.
January 23, 2026 at 1:40 PM
Short announcement before the data get too old: ccsmainz.github.io/platformnews/. With 571 news outlets on TikTok, YouTube Shorts, and Instagram across 46 countries, matching the @reutersinstitute.bsky.social DNR. Computational analyses on topics, platformization, diversity, etc. Feedback welcome.
Reposted by Tobias Dienlin
Comparing registrations to published papers is essential to research integrity - and almost no one does it routinely because it's slow, messy, and time-demanding.
RegCheck was built to help make this process easier.
Today, we launch RegCheck V2.
🧵
regcheck.app
RegCheck was built to help make this process easier.
Today, we launch RegCheck V2.
🧵
regcheck.app
RegCheck
RegCheck is an AI tool to compare preregistrations with papers instantly.
regcheck.app
January 22, 2026 at 11:05 AM
Comparing registrations to published papers is essential to research integrity - and almost no one does it routinely because it's slow, messy, and time-demanding.
RegCheck was built to help make this process easier.
Today, we launch RegCheck V2.
🧵
regcheck.app
RegCheck was built to help make this process easier.
Today, we launch RegCheck V2.
🧵
regcheck.app
TIL: “Sanewashing”
Übrigens - ganz wichtig: Dass von dieser Rede in Davos kein Sanewashing betrieben wird
Oft ist das Problem, dass Trump inkohärente & wirre Reden hält. Aber Berichte dann einzelne Auszüge herauspicken, die halbwegs kohärent wirken. Und das Publikum dann nicht mitbekommt, wie grotesk es wirklich war
Oft ist das Problem, dass Trump inkohärente & wirre Reden hält. Aber Berichte dann einzelne Auszüge herauspicken, die halbwegs kohärent wirken. Und das Publikum dann nicht mitbekommt, wie grotesk es wirklich war
January 22, 2026 at 8:44 AM
TIL: “Sanewashing”
I also cannot think of that many plausible omitted third variables that would explain much/the rest.
In sum, yes, reverse effect and omitted confounds might explain away the remaining .2. But while possible, I don’t think it’s that likely.
Plus, the effects are ofc theoretically plausible.
In sum, yes, reverse effect and omitted confounds might explain away the remaining .2. But while possible, I don’t think it’s that likely.
Plus, the effects are ofc theoretically plausible.
January 21, 2026 at 5:34 PM
I also cannot think of that many plausible omitted third variables that would explain much/the rest.
In sum, yes, reverse effect and omitted confounds might explain away the remaining .2. But while possible, I don’t think it’s that likely.
Plus, the effects are ofc theoretically plausible.
In sum, yes, reverse effect and omitted confounds might explain away the remaining .2. But while possible, I don’t think it’s that likely.
Plus, the effects are ofc theoretically plausible.
I’d be surprised (but very open to!) if the effect would vanish completely or below relevance.
Eg in other longitudinal research we see that selection effect (r side) is ~ half the size of media effect (mid)
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31061122/
(I think there’s even a meta analysis showing this)
Eg in other longitudinal research we see that selection effect (r side) is ~ half the size of media effect (mid)
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31061122/
(I think there’s even a meta analysis showing this)
January 21, 2026 at 5:31 PM
I’d be surprised (but very open to!) if the effect would vanish completely or below relevance.
Eg in other longitudinal research we see that selection effect (r side) is ~ half the size of media effect (mid)
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31061122/
(I think there’s even a meta analysis showing this)
Eg in other longitudinal research we see that selection effect (r side) is ~ half the size of media effect (mid)
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31061122/
(I think there’s even a meta analysis showing this)