www.nature.com/articles/s41...
www.nature.com/articles/s41...
Like a cat must be a horse, because what else, an elephant?
giftarticle.ft.com/giftarticle/... Reform UK receives record £9mn donation from Christopher Harborne
giftarticle.ft.com/giftarticle/... Reform UK receives record £9mn donation from Christopher Harborne
A timely World View Colin in our pages by Giorgio Gilestro
🧪 #academicSky
@nature.com
www.nature.com/articles/d41...
A timely World View Colin in our pages by Giorgio Gilestro
🧪 #academicSky
@nature.com
www.nature.com/articles/d41...
Introducing our new framework: MUPI (Embedded Universal Predictive Intelligence) which provides a theoretical basis for new cooperative solutions in RL.
Preprint🧵👇
(Paper link below.)
www.cam.ac.uk/jobs/univers...
www.cam.ac.uk/jobs/univers...
What I mean is that they should try to force progress by making an outrageous statement that the established field wants to be wrong, but do it so well that proving it wrong is a real challenge.
What I mean is that they should try to force progress by making an outrageous statement that the established field wants to be wrong, but do it so well that proving it wrong is a real challenge.
“Whilst the details of peer review are confidential, we can confirm that the article underwent two rounds of review from two independent peer reviewers, supporting an accept decision.”
How am I now expected to believe that two people looked at the paper twice and DGAF?
“Whilst the details of peer review are confidential, we can confirm that the article underwent two rounds of review from two independent peer reviewers, supporting an accept decision.”
How am I now expected to believe that two people looked at the paper twice and DGAF?
www.science.org/content/arti...
www.science.org/content/arti...
www.science.org/content/arti...
arxiv.org/pdf/2410.03972
It started from a question I kept running into:
When do RNNs trained on the same task converge/diverge in their solutions?
🧵⬇️
(I steered clear of tasteless analogies for this one...)
authors.elsevier.com/a/1m7H5_LsQS...
(I steered clear of tasteless analogies for this one...)
authors.elsevier.com/a/1m7H5_LsQS...