www.nature.com/articles/s41...
www.nature.com/articles/s41...
When the game is rigged, it's better to stop playing.
🧵 to understand the drain of scientific publishing👇
When the game is rigged, it's better to stop playing.
🧵 to understand the drain of scientific publishing👇
The data:
The data:
www.universiteitleiden.nl/en/news/2025...
www.universiteitleiden.nl/en/news/2025...
news.arizona.edu/news/confuse...
news.arizona.edu/news/confuse...
jamanetwork.com/journals/jam...
jamanetwork.com/journals/jam...
Also shows once more that providing statistical code should be mandatory for every single paper.
janhove.github.io/posts/2025-1...
Also shows once more that providing statistical code should be mandatory for every single paper.
janhove.github.io/posts/2025-1...
- Hallucinated references
- Undisclosed COIs (EiC is author)
- 8/9 authors have retractions or related scandals
- Hallucinated references
- Undisclosed COIs (EiC is author)
- 8/9 authors have retractions or related scandals
🧪 #PsychSciSky
www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...
🧪 #PsychSciSky
www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...
osf.io/preprints/ps...
osf.io/preprints/ps...
🧪 #psychscisky
osf.io/preprints/ps...
🧪 #psychscisky
osf.io/preprints/ps...
Imagine how many people at a journal need to not do their job at all (editor, reviewers, copy editor) for this to get published...
So look. I'll be honest. This style right now is hated, and for a reason - see for example this slop fake paper that got published in Nature (!!), then retracted (a separate problem of course)
www.nature.com/articles/s41...
Imagine how many people at a journal need to not do their job at all (editor, reviewers, copy editor) for this to get published...
Also, what exactly was the evidence base for this ban again?
Also, what exactly was the evidence base for this ban again?
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/...
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/...
However, he was -- and let's be slightly glib here -- some guy from The Netherlands who wrote social psychology papers.
The full accounting of the Eysenck case is approx, at minimum, TWO STAPELS.
retractionwatch.com/2025/12/03/n...
However, he was -- and let's be slightly glib here -- some guy from The Netherlands who wrote social psychology papers.
The full accounting of the Eysenck case is approx, at minimum, TWO STAPELS.
retractionwatch.com/2025/12/03/n...