threadbarepanda.bsky.social
@threadbarepanda.bsky.social
Reposted
So here we go again. Seems unlikely some (appalling) tweets from over a decade ago would rescind the citizenship. So it will go on and on. The law will shift to react to a single case and that law will then be used far more widely - especially should there be a Reform Home Secretary one day.
December 29, 2025 at 8:26 PM
Reposted
Of course the tweets were abhorrent.

But what happens now, knowing that deportation etc are difficult legal processes, this wound will be relentlessly reopened by populists. Then policy shifts inexorably towards abrogating human rights.

We have to stop this dynamic.

www.bbc.co.uk/news/article...
Home secretary urged to strip activist of British citizenship
Shabana Mahmood is facing growing calls to revoke the citizenship of British-Egyptian dual national Alaa Abdel Fattah after the emergence of social media posts.
www.bbc.co.uk
December 29, 2025 at 11:35 AM
Reposted
They'll blame you for them coming and blame you again for them leaving.

Why politicians trying to appease the anti-immigrant press is a complete hiding for nothing
December 29, 2025 at 8:28 PM
Reposted
The Musk/Zuckerberg/Thiel Effect

(Two of those are migrants too BTW)
Number of people who say Britons must be born in UK is rising, study shows

About one-third of people (36%) thought a person must be born in Britain to be truly British, up from one in five (19%) in 2023, a YouGov poll carried out this month found

www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2025...
Number of people who say Britons must be born in UK is rising, study shows
Exclusive: Research finds ‘worrying’ surge in support for hard-right narratives on national identity
www.theguardian.com
December 29, 2025 at 8:32 PM
Reposted
It's really beyond belief. Now, the "Romanians propped up UK's economy" (though I notice the Mail have now changed the headline). Then, they were taking our job/ scrounging welfare/ committing crimes. As, ofc, the Mail now says non-EU immigrants are doing.
December 29, 2025 at 6:47 PM
Reposted
I'd go further, and say it shouldn't ever be revoked unless it can be demonstrated that it was acquired in bad faith AND that the person is not left stateless.

As someone else noted, the alternative is that naturalisation only creates second-class citizens, here on sufferance.
December 29, 2025 at 5:58 PM
Reposted
It should never be possible for any minister to revoke citizenship with a stroke of the pen. #checks #balances
Jenrick - like Farage - wants to be an unaccountable tyrant like Trump.
December 29, 2025 at 4:17 PM
Reposted
A lack of realisation that the Western political spectrum doesn't map that well in a lot of other countries and that many dissidents and pro-democracy campaigners might not necessarily be cuddly Westernised liberals, etc.?

Without getting too relativist.

Most famously, Alexander Solzhenitsyn.
December 29, 2025 at 5:09 PM
Reposted
Indeed. I do would also just note (not targeted at you) that some of the people commenting on this visibly did not hold Navalny to this standard (and rightly did not).
December 29, 2025 at 5:10 PM
Reposted
Your regular dose of hypocrisy from Farage who, unlike apparently Abd El Fattah, has made neither a full nor a sincere apology for all the hateful racism he spewed out as a young man.
December 29, 2025 at 5:01 PM
Reposted
Number crunching: Telegraph editorial columns in December highlighting ‘the unreliability of social media’ v corrections the Telegraph has had to publish so far this year due to inaccurate reporting

From the new Private Eye, out now.
December 27, 2025 at 9:15 AM
Reposted
I've been doing this as a comedy bit for years, but I do believe it; before I die, I will see the establishment of a Royal Commission on Britain's failure to attract sufficient immigration, and many of today's broadsheet ethnonationalists will be on it
December 29, 2025 at 4:49 PM
Reposted
21% of NHS staff are immigrants, but only 16% of the UK population was born overseas.

So are you more likely to be treated by an immigrant - or stand behind them in the NHS queue?

Here’s what people told us.
December 29, 2025 at 5:37 PM
Reposted
"Farage and Badenoch are free to offer up an explanation as to why Connolly should be able to incite violence without consequence, while el-Fattah should face extrajudicial punishment for it. Until they do so, there is an all too obvious one: they are openly pandering to racists."
Calls to remove el-Fattah’s UK citizenship are dictatorial
Yes his tweets were disgusting, possibly criminal, yet it should not be possible for politicians to revoke someone’s national identity just because they dislike their views
www.thenewworld.co.uk
December 29, 2025 at 6:05 PM
Reposted
when labour started down this path, over 200 uk politics academics singed an open letter warning them it wouldn't work

www.politicalphilosophypodcast.com/starmer
December 29, 2025 at 6:01 PM
Reposted
Predictions for British politics in 2026 will be even tougher than usual because I think we are potentially near inflection points for both Lab and Con - if current steep declines continue, that will soon provoke leadership crisis/challenge which will change poll dynamics.
A reminder of yesterday's post reviewing last year's Christmas predictions for 2025. I will start a new prediction thread for 2026 about a week from now. If there's a prediction you'd like me to make, post it in the replies here!
New Swingometer post! I review the preditions I made last Christmas about politics in 2025 and try and draw some lessons from my various blunders and missteps:

swingometer.substack.com/p/my-2025-pr...
December 28, 2025 at 7:28 PM
Reposted
I'm certainly not defending the Abd el-Fattah tweets but I really can't stomach the outrage about them from those who also insisted that Lucy Connelly was a heroic martyr for free speech and were equally outraged by her punishment.
December 29, 2025 at 6:15 PM
Reposted
It is *incredibly* weird that the President publicly claimed three days ago that the US struck a facility in Venezuela and we still don't even know whether it actually happened or not.

I mean, I just don't have words for how weird that is. And I do words for a living.
December 29, 2025 at 5:58 PM
Reposted
A genuinely progressive and liberal govt would act to reverse this trend and entrench citizenship rights given the dangers ahead. I fear the current govt will do the opposite.
December 29, 2025 at 3:12 PM
Reposted
To be honest, reading this, things have proceeded much further than I had realised. I fear the precedents already established in last 20 years or so will mean a Reform Home Sec has sweeping powers to act against any dual citizen or naturalised citizen they take against bsky.app/profile/bows...
December 29, 2025 at 3:12 PM
Reposted
I already agree with this in principle - citizenship is an untouchable status or it is nothing - but also for reasons of prudence. “The Home Sec can revoke citizenship when he/she deems someone’s online output sufficiently offensive” is a v dangerous precedent to set with Reform leading all polls.
Hell, I'm not convinced we should revoke citizenship at all.

But certainly not for being a twat online.
December 29, 2025 at 11:18 AM
Reposted
At the other place, a Tory MP was saying that “he’s not really British”. Leaving aside the legal incoherence of such a statement, the same could, at some point, very much have been said about his leader
December 29, 2025 at 10:54 AM
Reposted
Frankly for a policy that is many ways *less* liberal than her own route to citizenship. 'You have an automatic right to citizenship if one of your parents is a British citizen' is a much much less controversial citizenship route than 'your posh Nigerian parents flew to the UK then flew out': !
December 29, 2025 at 10:45 AM
Reposted
Hell, I'm not convinced we should revoke citizenship at all.

But certainly not for being a twat online.
December 29, 2025 at 10:32 AM