River 🏳️⚧️🧿🪬🏳️🌈
@riverenodian.bsky.social
Millennial leftist, non-binary trans, aroace, neurospicy (ADHD, cPTSD), 🥄ie, gamer (World of Warcraft, D&D, FFXIV), Jewish & Jewitch, Blue Star & Alexandrian initiate, witch, cat parent, nerd, ❤️ ☕️,🍵,&🍫
Linktree: https://linktr.ee/river.enodian
Linktree: https://linktr.ee/river.enodian
Pinned
Does Q count? More of an antagonist than a villain per se but
January 3, 2026 at 11:56 PM
Does Q count? More of an antagonist than a villain per se but
The OA, The Secret Circle, ST: Discovery
Name your fav show that was cancelled too soon
January 3, 2026 at 11:55 PM
The OA, The Secret Circle, ST: Discovery
Reposted by River 🏳️⚧️🧿🪬🏳️🌈
A small (personal) example of this book’s intellectual dishonesty:
My father-in-law is reading In Covid’s Wake, and excitedly told me he found a passage where I’m quoted. The quote in question is me saying the FBI worked to censor speech on social media.
Huh? When did I say that?!
My father-in-law is reading In Covid’s Wake, and excitedly told me he found a passage where I’m quoted. The quote in question is me saying the FBI worked to censor speech on social media.
Huh? When did I say that?!
December 24, 2025 at 7:00 PM
A small (personal) example of this book’s intellectual dishonesty:
My father-in-law is reading In Covid’s Wake, and excitedly told me he found a passage where I’m quoted. The quote in question is me saying the FBI worked to censor speech on social media.
Huh? When did I say that?!
My father-in-law is reading In Covid’s Wake, and excitedly told me he found a passage where I’m quoted. The quote in question is me saying the FBI worked to censor speech on social media.
Huh? When did I say that?!
Reposted by River 🏳️⚧️🧿🪬🏳️🌈
This is terrible.
A small (personal) example of this book’s intellectual dishonesty:
My father-in-law is reading In Covid’s Wake, and excitedly told me he found a passage where I’m quoted. The quote in question is me saying the FBI worked to censor speech on social media.
Huh? When did I say that?!
My father-in-law is reading In Covid’s Wake, and excitedly told me he found a passage where I’m quoted. The quote in question is me saying the FBI worked to censor speech on social media.
Huh? When did I say that?!
December 25, 2025 at 2:56 AM
This is terrible.
Reposted by River 🏳️⚧️🧿🪬🏳️🌈
Also worth pointing out that "progressive" doesn't really mean left-wing. It generally means right-of-center - a capitalist who seeks regulation of industry, but not the abolishment of the so-called capitalist "free market" itself.
e.g. Bernie is a progressive, but not a leftist/communist.
e.g. Bernie is a progressive, but not a leftist/communist.
December 25, 2025 at 1:49 AM
Also worth pointing out that "progressive" doesn't really mean left-wing. It generally means right-of-center - a capitalist who seeks regulation of industry, but not the abolishment of the so-called capitalist "free market" itself.
e.g. Bernie is a progressive, but not a leftist/communist.
e.g. Bernie is a progressive, but not a leftist/communist.
Reposted by River 🏳️⚧️🧿🪬🏳️🌈
Yes, the world is going to shit. Commit to fighting shit with joy in 2026. Cultivate joy in resistance. It feels wonderful to say “No, this is not how I want to live. No to fascism, robot slop, economic oppression, bigotry, and the criminally stupid. “
Fight for your soul with all you’ve got.
Fight for your soul with all you’ve got.
December 24, 2025 at 4:02 PM
Yes, the world is going to shit. Commit to fighting shit with joy in 2026. Cultivate joy in resistance. It feels wonderful to say “No, this is not how I want to live. No to fascism, robot slop, economic oppression, bigotry, and the criminally stupid. “
Fight for your soul with all you’ve got.
Fight for your soul with all you’ve got.
Reposted by River 🏳️⚧️🧿🪬🏳️🌈
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHH
December 23, 2025 at 10:04 AM
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHH
Reposted by River 🏳️⚧️🧿🪬🏳️🌈
If you happen to be looking for bad redactions in a large set of data files today for some reason, there's an open source tool for that.
Y’all know we have a tool for finding exactly these kinds of bad redactions, right? free.law/open-source-...
December 23, 2025 at 6:31 AM
If you happen to be looking for bad redactions in a large set of data files today for some reason, there's an open source tool for that.
Reposted by River 🏳️⚧️🧿🪬🏳️🌈
Learning how to pay attention to small details, how to deliberately strain yourself to notice tiny details that are off, is a skill programmers learn the painful way.
And, using a chatbot deskills you in this very extremely important skill of being able to pay attention to small details.
And, using a chatbot deskills you in this very extremely important skill of being able to pay attention to small details.
December 23, 2025 at 7:18 AM
Learning how to pay attention to small details, how to deliberately strain yourself to notice tiny details that are off, is a skill programmers learn the painful way.
And, using a chatbot deskills you in this very extremely important skill of being able to pay attention to small details.
And, using a chatbot deskills you in this very extremely important skill of being able to pay attention to small details.
Reposted by River 🏳️⚧️🧿🪬🏳️🌈
I don’t mean to sound extreme, but I don’t think we should have torture camps for people with criminal records either.
December 23, 2025 at 1:51 AM
I don’t mean to sound extreme, but I don’t think we should have torture camps for people with criminal records either.
Reposted by River 🏳️⚧️🧿🪬🏳️🌈
People will really get on here and be like "having increased worker protections won't help trans people so we should never do that ever" and a bunch of you dumb fucks nod sagely at it while ignoring all the actual trans people struggling to make ends meet scream at you
December 23, 2025 at 10:00 AM
People will really get on here and be like "having increased worker protections won't help trans people so we should never do that ever" and a bunch of you dumb fucks nod sagely at it while ignoring all the actual trans people struggling to make ends meet scream at you
Reposted by River 🏳️⚧️🧿🪬🏳️🌈
AAAAAAAAAHHH
December 23, 2025 at 10:42 AM
AAAAAAAAAHHH
Reposted by River 🏳️⚧️🧿🪬🏳️🌈
Litigation and rulings across the US are doing more than restricting access to services for transgender individuals; they are actively reengineering administrative and legal systems to undermine privacy.
www.techpolicy.press...
#transgender #trans #LGBTQ #LGBTQIA
www.techpolicy.press...
#transgender #trans #LGBTQ #LGBTQIA
Gender Politics and the Weaponization of Personal Data | TechPolicy.Press
Katelyn Ringrose, CJ Larkin, Os Keyes, and Jay T. Conrad explain how federal policies are weaponizing data to target transgender and gender diverse individuals.
www.techpolicy.press
December 23, 2025 at 10:43 AM
Litigation and rulings across the US are doing more than restricting access to services for transgender individuals; they are actively reengineering administrative and legal systems to undermine privacy.
www.techpolicy.press...
#transgender #trans #LGBTQ #LGBTQIA
www.techpolicy.press...
#transgender #trans #LGBTQ #LGBTQIA
Reposted by River 🏳️⚧️🧿🪬🏳️🌈
Senator Warren, have you investigated what’s happening to the formerly East Wing of The White House?? What is the National Security issue with delaying construction?? I thought it was just a gilded ballroom? What is Trump lying about.
December 19, 2025 at 4:06 AM
Senator Warren, have you investigated what’s happening to the formerly East Wing of The White House?? What is the National Security issue with delaying construction?? I thought it was just a gilded ballroom? What is Trump lying about.
Reposted by River 🏳️⚧️🧿🪬🏳️🌈
You voted for the tiktok ban. You helped make this happen.
First Paramount / CBS and now TikTok.
Trump wants to hand over even more control of what you watch to his billionaire buddies.
Americans deserve to know if the President struck another backdoor deal for this billionaire takeover of TikTok.
Trump wants to hand over even more control of what you watch to his billionaire buddies.
Americans deserve to know if the President struck another backdoor deal for this billionaire takeover of TikTok.
December 19, 2025 at 12:58 AM
You voted for the tiktok ban. You helped make this happen.
Reposted by River 🏳️⚧️🧿🪬🏳️🌈
So...did you vote against the TikTok ban?
First Paramount / CBS and now TikTok.
Trump wants to hand over even more control of what you watch to his billionaire buddies.
Americans deserve to know if the President struck another backdoor deal for this billionaire takeover of TikTok.
Trump wants to hand over even more control of what you watch to his billionaire buddies.
Americans deserve to know if the President struck another backdoor deal for this billionaire takeover of TikTok.
December 19, 2025 at 1:33 AM
So...did you vote against the TikTok ban?
Reposted by River 🏳️⚧️🧿🪬🏳️🌈
Why the fuck were you so stupid to vote for the TikTok ban?
You did absolutely no research into it
Facebook should have been shut down not TikTok
You did absolutely no research into it
Facebook should have been shut down not TikTok
First Paramount / CBS and now TikTok.
Trump wants to hand over even more control of what you watch to his billionaire buddies.
Americans deserve to know if the President struck another backdoor deal for this billionaire takeover of TikTok.
Trump wants to hand over even more control of what you watch to his billionaire buddies.
Americans deserve to know if the President struck another backdoor deal for this billionaire takeover of TikTok.
December 19, 2025 at 1:37 AM
Why the fuck were you so stupid to vote for the TikTok ban?
You did absolutely no research into it
Facebook should have been shut down not TikTok
You did absolutely no research into it
Facebook should have been shut down not TikTok
Reposted by River 🏳️⚧️🧿🪬🏳️🌈
Maybe you should've thought of that BEFORE you gave them this power
First Paramount / CBS and now TikTok.
Trump wants to hand over even more control of what you watch to his billionaire buddies.
Americans deserve to know if the President struck another backdoor deal for this billionaire takeover of TikTok.
Trump wants to hand over even more control of what you watch to his billionaire buddies.
Americans deserve to know if the President struck another backdoor deal for this billionaire takeover of TikTok.
December 19, 2025 at 2:33 AM
Maybe you should've thought of that BEFORE you gave them this power
Reposted by River 🏳️⚧️🧿🪬🏳️🌈
It's so weird that Oracle gets TikTok. Like, it's the company from Dilbert
First Paramount / CBS and now TikTok.
Trump wants to hand over even more control of what you watch to his billionaire buddies.
Americans deserve to know if the President struck another backdoor deal for this billionaire takeover of TikTok.
Trump wants to hand over even more control of what you watch to his billionaire buddies.
Americans deserve to know if the President struck another backdoor deal for this billionaire takeover of TikTok.
December 19, 2025 at 3:24 AM
It's so weird that Oracle gets TikTok. Like, it's the company from Dilbert
Reposted by River 🏳️⚧️🧿🪬🏳️🌈
Um... You voted for this. And you're making it worse by supporting censorship bills like KOSA. You and the Democratic Party are allowing Trump and the billionaires gain more power over people while policing our speech. Stop with the theatrics and actually fight for us!
First Paramount / CBS and now TikTok.
Trump wants to hand over even more control of what you watch to his billionaire buddies.
Americans deserve to know if the President struck another backdoor deal for this billionaire takeover of TikTok.
Trump wants to hand over even more control of what you watch to his billionaire buddies.
Americans deserve to know if the President struck another backdoor deal for this billionaire takeover of TikTok.
December 19, 2025 at 3:32 AM
Um... You voted for this. And you're making it worse by supporting censorship bills like KOSA. You and the Democratic Party are allowing Trump and the billionaires gain more power over people while policing our speech. Stop with the theatrics and actually fight for us!
Reposted by River 🏳️⚧️🧿🪬🏳️🌈
Warren you are my senator but you are rightfully getting eaten alive in the comments for this. You were supposed to destroy the oligarchs, not join them. Yet, you voted for the TikTok sale. You are co-sponsoring KOSA. You won't meet with non-profits who are telling you to cut it out. This is on you.
First Paramount / CBS and now TikTok.
Trump wants to hand over even more control of what you watch to his billionaire buddies.
Americans deserve to know if the President struck another backdoor deal for this billionaire takeover of TikTok.
Trump wants to hand over even more control of what you watch to his billionaire buddies.
Americans deserve to know if the President struck another backdoor deal for this billionaire takeover of TikTok.
December 19, 2025 at 4:52 AM
Warren you are my senator but you are rightfully getting eaten alive in the comments for this. You were supposed to destroy the oligarchs, not join them. Yet, you voted for the TikTok sale. You are co-sponsoring KOSA. You won't meet with non-profits who are telling you to cut it out. This is on you.
Reposted by River 🏳️⚧️🧿🪬🏳️🌈
Just to be clear, the Boomers don’t understand TikTok or what is on it.
You know that Rolling Stone article that just came out saying everyone mean to Taylor Swift is a bot?
They thought it was that but China was the bot.
But like idk who Mom thought was gonna buy it who wasn’t a billionaire
You know that Rolling Stone article that just came out saying everyone mean to Taylor Swift is a bot?
They thought it was that but China was the bot.
But like idk who Mom thought was gonna buy it who wasn’t a billionaire
First Paramount / CBS and now TikTok.
Trump wants to hand over even more control of what you watch to his billionaire buddies.
Americans deserve to know if the President struck another backdoor deal for this billionaire takeover of TikTok.
Trump wants to hand over even more control of what you watch to his billionaire buddies.
Americans deserve to know if the President struck another backdoor deal for this billionaire takeover of TikTok.
December 19, 2025 at 6:30 AM
Just to be clear, the Boomers don’t understand TikTok or what is on it.
You know that Rolling Stone article that just came out saying everyone mean to Taylor Swift is a bot?
They thought it was that but China was the bot.
But like idk who Mom thought was gonna buy it who wasn’t a billionaire
You know that Rolling Stone article that just came out saying everyone mean to Taylor Swift is a bot?
They thought it was that but China was the bot.
But like idk who Mom thought was gonna buy it who wasn’t a billionaire
Reposted by River 🏳️⚧️🧿🪬🏳️🌈
Warren voted for the divestment bill that set this whole chain of events in motion. I was a huge Warren fan at one point, but the inability of her to engage in a bit of introspection here isn't particularly flattering. An incredibly consequential mistake.
December 19, 2025 at 7:31 AM
Warren voted for the divestment bill that set this whole chain of events in motion. I was a huge Warren fan at one point, but the inability of her to engage in a bit of introspection here isn't particularly flattering. An incredibly consequential mistake.
Reposted by River 🏳️⚧️🧿🪬🏳️🌈
SCOTUS maybe can't be blamed for not predicting exactly this, but the First Amendment was intended to prevent this outcome by heading off its beginning. Its decision upholding the TikTok ban looks worse today than ever -- as @jameeljaffer.bsky.social & I wrote:
www.theguardian.com/commentisfre...
www.theguardian.com/commentisfre...
December 19, 2025 at 2:19 PM
SCOTUS maybe can't be blamed for not predicting exactly this, but the First Amendment was intended to prevent this outcome by heading off its beginning. Its decision upholding the TikTok ban looks worse today than ever -- as @jameeljaffer.bsky.social & I wrote:
www.theguardian.com/commentisfre...
www.theguardian.com/commentisfre...