Why Early Career Researchers Can't Say No (And How To Fix It) ⮛
What are some others?
'Just some minor inadvertent errors'
'Hey it was published so it must be ok'
'Who are you anyway to question me?'
(Center square: EVEN IF IT WAS TRUE, IT DOES NOT CHANGE THE RESULTS.)
* Those images were just illustrations
* The intern made them
* The peer reviewers did not catch these
* Your AI software did not yet exist
* Our data is solid
#PubPeerParley
pubpeer.com/publications...
What are some others?
'Just some minor inadvertent errors'
'Hey it was published so it must be ok'
'Who are you anyway to question me?'
(Center square: EVEN IF IT WAS TRUE, IT DOES NOT CHANGE THE RESULTS.)
Elsevier: $3.9 billion, Springer Nature: $2 billion, Wiley: $1.8 billion
As for peer reviewers, they are paid $0.
ReseachHub is a new online platform that pays peer reviewers up to $150 per review:
Elsevier: $3.9 billion, Springer Nature: $2 billion, Wiley: $1.8 billion
As for peer reviewers, they are paid $0.
ReseachHub is a new online platform that pays peer reviewers up to $150 per review:
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC...
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC...
go.bsky.app/8Uao5mv
go.bsky.app/8Uao5mv