vacancies.uea.ac.uk/vacancies/15...
vacancies.uea.ac.uk/vacancies/15...
@murray.senate.gov ! More of this, please!
www.murray.senate.gov/senator-murr...
@murray.senate.gov ! More of this, please!
www.murray.senate.gov/senator-murr...
arizona.csod.com/ux/ats/caree...
arizona.csod.com/ux/ats/caree...
tinyurl.com/dartmouthneuro
tinyurl.com/dartmouthneuro
Featuring @charan-neuro.bsky.social author of NYT Bestseller WHY WE REMEMBER. linktr.ee/whyweremember
Stay tuned for call for panel announcement & call for papers
tameg.ca
@barense.bsky.social @marymcandrews.bsky.social
Featuring @charan-neuro.bsky.social author of NYT Bestseller WHY WE REMEMBER. linktr.ee/whyweremember
Stay tuned for call for panel announcement & call for papers
tameg.ca
@barense.bsky.social @marymcandrews.bsky.social
Check out a new position posting here.
Come join me and other awesome colleagues @ucimind.bsky.social @ucirvine.bsky.social 🚨🔔
recruit.ap.uci.edu/JPF09362
Check out a new position posting here.
Come join me and other awesome colleagues @ucimind.bsky.social @ucirvine.bsky.social 🚨🔔
recruit.ap.uci.edu/JPF09362
1. The importance of stupidity in scientific research
Open Access
journals.biologists.com/jcs/article/...
1. The importance of stupidity in scientific research
Open Access
journals.biologists.com/jcs/article/...
www.cnn.com/2024/12/10/h...
www.cnn.com/2024/12/10/h...
Join us for this virtual workshop w/ @blackinneuro.bsky.social to learn about the dos and don'ts of effective & constructive peer reviews!
Join us for a virtual workshop with @blackinneuro.bsky.social! We'll discuss the structure & content of peer reviews & provide advice about how to write your first review.
Register here: blackinneuro47.wildapricot.org/event-5883989
Join us for this virtual workshop w/ @blackinneuro.bsky.social to learn about the dos and don'ts of effective & constructive peer reviews!
A Place of Joy.
doi.org/10.1093/cerc...
doi.org/10.1093/cerc...
The two books that are foundational for memory researchers represent this difference.
Ebbinghaus (1885) Memory. Treated memory as a thing, both as a capability and as individual traces.
Bartlett (1932) Remembering. Treated memory as an activity, the reconstruction of events.
"Things" focus on static natures ("that cat"); process focus on dynamics ("it's raining"). Cats too are impermanent, but we don't say "catting".
We have a strong things bias. What do we mischaracterize by thinking about things not processes?
The two books that are foundational for memory researchers represent this difference.
Ebbinghaus (1885) Memory. Treated memory as a thing, both as a capability and as individual traces.
Bartlett (1932) Remembering. Treated memory as an activity, the reconstruction of events.
Led by the awesome @hardigirl.bsky.social postdoc in THINC Lab
elifesciences.org/articles/93689
Led by the awesome @hardigirl.bsky.social postdoc in THINC Lab
elifesciences.org/articles/93689