Jack Harrison
@jlharrison.bsky.social
Former maths extraordinaire (he/him)
Reposted by Jack Harrison
Do your fkn job. Stop using what each side said as some sort of proxy for doing your fkn job. Look out the window and tell people whether it's raining or not. That's your fkn job.
January 8, 2026 at 1:50 PM
Do your fkn job. Stop using what each side said as some sort of proxy for doing your fkn job. Look out the window and tell people whether it's raining or not. That's your fkn job.
Reposted by Jack Harrison
I appreciate a lot of us will think "they've always been like this" but the utter moral decay on the right in the last few years has been notable.
A shift from love the sinner, hate the sin fig leaf to "yeah, kill she/her, haha, pronouns in bio."
A shift from love the sinner, hate the sin fig leaf to "yeah, kill she/her, haha, pronouns in bio."
Jesse Watters highlights that Renee Nicole Good, the woman killed by ICE, had "pronouns in her bio" and "leaves behind a lesbian partner and a child from a previous marriage"
January 8, 2026 at 9:28 AM
I appreciate a lot of us will think "they've always been like this" but the utter moral decay on the right in the last few years has been notable.
A shift from love the sinner, hate the sin fig leaf to "yeah, kill she/her, haha, pronouns in bio."
A shift from love the sinner, hate the sin fig leaf to "yeah, kill she/her, haha, pronouns in bio."
This is where all your transphobia leads, using pronouns in bio to justify a murder. Every single centrist, terf, guardian columnist, both-sides-er who gladly jumped in bed with the far right on this took us to this point. I’m so fucking angry
Jesse Watters highlights that Renee Nicole Good, the woman killed by ICE, had "pronouns in her bio" and "leaves behind a lesbian partner and a child from a previous marriage"
January 8, 2026 at 10:13 AM
This is where all your transphobia leads, using pronouns in bio to justify a murder. Every single centrist, terf, guardian columnist, both-sides-er who gladly jumped in bed with the far right on this took us to this point. I’m so fucking angry
Reposted by Jack Harrison
Evil, evil, evil
Jesse Watters highlights that Renee Nicole Good, the woman killed by ICE, had "pronouns in her bio" and "leaves behind a lesbian partner and a child from a previous marriage"
January 8, 2026 at 10:10 AM
Evil, evil, evil
Reposted by Jack Harrison
I understand the pressures on the BBC, but Radio 4's coverage of the Minneapolis shooting is an example of "bad balance".
It's all "the Trump regime says she was a terrorist, but Democrats say it was murder".
The BBC has the footage. It doesn't have to treat truth and falsehood as equally valid.
It's all "the Trump regime says she was a terrorist, but Democrats say it was murder".
The BBC has the footage. It doesn't have to treat truth and falsehood as equally valid.
January 8, 2026 at 8:38 AM
I understand the pressures on the BBC, but Radio 4's coverage of the Minneapolis shooting is an example of "bad balance".
It's all "the Trump regime says she was a terrorist, but Democrats say it was murder".
The BBC has the footage. It doesn't have to treat truth and falsehood as equally valid.
It's all "the Trump regime says she was a terrorist, but Democrats say it was murder".
The BBC has the footage. It doesn't have to treat truth and falsehood as equally valid.
The BBC must have seen different videos to us since it’s very obvious from the videos circulating on social media that the murdered woman did not run anyone over.
January 8, 2026 at 8:53 AM
The BBC must have seen different videos to us since it’s very obvious from the videos circulating on social media that the murdered woman did not run anyone over.
They will kill you dead in broad daylight and the most powerful man in the world will lie to cover for them. I’m so angry
January 7, 2026 at 10:29 PM
They will kill you dead in broad daylight and the most powerful man in the world will lie to cover for them. I’m so angry
I’m quite hawkish on Russia so I actually think seizing Russian oil is probably a net good but the problem is that they are doing it for the wrong reasons as it’s linked to Venezuela instead of the war in Ukraine, and I’m not sure British military forces should be anywhere near the Venezuela issue.
January 7, 2026 at 7:31 PM
I’m quite hawkish on Russia so I actually think seizing Russian oil is probably a net good but the problem is that they are doing it for the wrong reasons as it’s linked to Venezuela instead of the war in Ukraine, and I’m not sure British military forces should be anywhere near the Venezuela issue.
In the event of invasion, Greenland MUST be defended. The fact we probably wouldn’t win that fight is not an excuse to not try.
January 6, 2026 at 11:05 PM
In the event of invasion, Greenland MUST be defended. The fact we probably wouldn’t win that fight is not an excuse to not try.
Having a wedding booked for October 2026 is starting to feel a lot like having a wedding booked for October 2020 now.
January 6, 2026 at 10:57 PM
Having a wedding booked for October 2026 is starting to feel a lot like having a wedding booked for October 2020 now.
Somehow missed that Curtis Yarvin was on newsnight what the fuck
January 6, 2026 at 6:28 PM
Somehow missed that Curtis Yarvin was on newsnight what the fuck
PM spox refusing to hold the line on a statement the PM issued literally an hour earlier concerning Greenland it would appear.
Keir Starmer’s spokesman asked to respond to Donald Trump’s aide Stephen Miller saying the US plans to seize Greenland, replies that they “won’t give a running commentary on every remark on foreign policy” and “the Prime Minister is a world leader, not a commentator”
January 6, 2026 at 2:01 PM
PM spox refusing to hold the line on a statement the PM issued literally an hour earlier concerning Greenland it would appear.
Reposted by Jack Harrison
Joint statement on Greenland.
January 6, 2026 at 12:00 PM
Joint statement on Greenland.
I’m so fr when I say that we should respond militarily to a US attempt to take Greenland. I know that makes me a hawk, I know we probably wouldn’t win, but I think it is actually extremely important to defend the sovereignty of our close allies.
TAPPER: Can you rule out the US is going to take Greenland by force?
MILLER: Greenland should be part of the US. By what right does Denmark assert control over Greenland? The US is the power of NATO
T: So force is on the table?
M: Nobody is gonna fight the US militarily over future of Greenland
MILLER: Greenland should be part of the US. By what right does Denmark assert control over Greenland? The US is the power of NATO
T: So force is on the table?
M: Nobody is gonna fight the US militarily over future of Greenland
January 6, 2026 at 8:45 AM
I’m so fr when I say that we should respond militarily to a US attempt to take Greenland. I know that makes me a hawk, I know we probably wouldn’t win, but I think it is actually extremely important to defend the sovereignty of our close allies.
The fake military man story absolutely amazes me because if he had pretended to be a naval officer of a normal rank he might not have got found out but he had to go big or go home by opting to impersonate a rank so high that if you genuinely attain it you might have a Wikipedia page.
January 5, 2026 at 9:15 PM
The fake military man story absolutely amazes me because if he had pretended to be a naval officer of a normal rank he might not have got found out but he had to go big or go home by opting to impersonate a rank so high that if you genuinely attain it you might have a Wikipedia page.
Lots of Venezuelans would be happy to see Maduro go but the US stomped on all that goodwill by announcing they are going to run the country becuase if you had to choose between a dictatorship grown at home and a dictatorship imposed onto you by a foreign hostile power, it's not really a choice is it
January 5, 2026 at 8:45 PM
Lots of Venezuelans would be happy to see Maduro go but the US stomped on all that goodwill by announcing they are going to run the country becuase if you had to choose between a dictatorship grown at home and a dictatorship imposed onto you by a foreign hostile power, it's not really a choice is it
Reposted by Jack Harrison
If your version of freedom of speech includes the freedom to create child abuse images you should be in prison
Cabinet Office Minister Baroness Anderson tells the Lords the Government will keep on using X.
"I still believe that X is an appropriate platform to use because I believe in freedom of speech..."
"It is incredibly important that there is a counter narrative on those platforms," she says.
"I still believe that X is an appropriate platform to use because I believe in freedom of speech..."
"It is incredibly important that there is a counter narrative on those platforms," she says.
January 5, 2026 at 4:30 PM
If your version of freedom of speech includes the freedom to create child abuse images you should be in prison
Reposted by Jack Harrison
My Christian faith means I love it when twelve guys (gender neutral) all hang out in a room
January 5, 2026 at 6:09 PM
My Christian faith means I love it when twelve guys (gender neutral) all hang out in a room
Reposted by Jack Harrison
Weak. Deluded. Get him out.
Keir Starmer: "I constantly remind myself that 24/7 our defence, our security & our intelligent relationship with the US matters probably more than any other relationship we've got in the world and it would not be in our national interest to weaken that in any way"
January 5, 2026 at 9:32 AM
Weak. Deluded. Get him out.
Reposted by Jack Harrison
That’ll teach junk food companies for taking up precious space in the gambling advert break
January 5, 2026 at 9:09 AM
That’ll teach junk food companies for taking up precious space in the gambling advert break
Makes appeasement look like a joke, doesn’t it.
Keir Starmer: "I constantly remind myself that 24/7 our defence, our security & our intelligent relationship with the US matters probably more than any other relationship we've got in the world and it would not be in our national interest to weaken that in any way"
January 4, 2026 at 2:04 PM
Makes appeasement look like a joke, doesn’t it.
Still mad that it turns out the number of British political leaders ready to defend the very concept of a rules-based international order is zero.
Do they think that a might makes right world would be better? Do they forget or not care for why we moved away from that?
Do they think that a might makes right world would be better? Do they forget or not care for why we moved away from that?
January 4, 2026 at 11:16 AM
Still mad that it turns out the number of British political leaders ready to defend the very concept of a rules-based international order is zero.
Do they think that a might makes right world would be better? Do they forget or not care for why we moved away from that?
Do they think that a might makes right world would be better? Do they forget or not care for why we moved away from that?
NYT, not exactly known for not acquiescing to Trump, emerges with more backbone than most of the European democracies.
January 3, 2026 at 8:18 PM
NYT, not exactly known for not acquiescing to Trump, emerges with more backbone than most of the European democracies.
I'm so pissed off about this, you can't just say "I reiterated my support for international law" while endorsing an action that is in obvious breach of international law.
Keir Starmer explicitly backs Trump's attack on Venezuela.
Says he has "long supported" getting rid of Maduro, who is an "illegitimate President" and "we shed no tears about the end of his regime".
Says he has "long supported" getting rid of Maduro, who is an "illegitimate President" and "we shed no tears about the end of his regime".
January 3, 2026 at 8:14 PM
I'm so pissed off about this, you can't just say "I reiterated my support for international law" while endorsing an action that is in obvious breach of international law.