KRAS G12C-associated immunotherapy benefit in NSCLC
is substantially mediated by tobacco-induced tumor mutation burden—not allele-specific effects.
authors.elsevier.com/a/1ls3ocYZOi...
🎁 article 👉 www.nytimes.com/2025/12/26/n... #IDSky
🎁 article 👉 www.nytimes.com/2025/12/26/n... #IDSky
2/3
2/3
3/3
3/3
www.qeios.com/read/LRRYCD
www.qeios.com/read/LRRYCD
Happy Christmas everyone!
Happy Christmas everyone!
www.nature.com/articles/s41...
www.nature.com/articles/s41...
Maybe because everyone can benefit from reading it?
academic.oup.com/cid/article-...
Maybe because everyone can benefit from reading it?
academic.oup.com/cid/article-...
Events do not exist: they happen.
My inexpert coda: not only does the human-centered desire for events to exist commonly cause confusion in the interpretation of relativity, it is the primary cause of ontological confusion in quantum mechanics as well.
That idea has shaped physics for over a century. But when you look closely, it doesn’t hold together.
This article explains what goes wrong.
Read here: cosmicave.org/links/
Events do not exist: they happen.
Actually, I’ll put it back to you differently:
I don’t think there’s any chance we can “quantize gravity” without first resolving the basic ontological confusion surrounding existence, time, events and space-time.
Eg space-time as an emergent quantum structure is structurally incoherent.
Actually, I’ll put it back to you differently:
I don’t think there’s any chance we can “quantize gravity” without first resolving the basic ontological confusion surrounding existence, time, events and space-time.
Eg space-time as an emergent quantum structure is structurally incoherent.
Is the standard conceptual architecture (eg @quantamagazine.bsky.social) structurally coherent if:
-Emergence requires a substrate
-Quantization presupposes an ontology
-Spacetime cannot be both
-Not without conflating representational levels
🧪 ⚛️ #philsci #philsky
My inexpert coda: not only does the human-centered desire for events to exist commonly cause confusion in the interpretation of relativity, it is the primary cause of ontological confusion in quantum mechanics as well.
That idea has shaped physics for over a century. But when you look closely, it doesn’t hold together.
This article explains what goes wrong.
Read here: cosmicave.org/links/
Is the standard conceptual architecture (eg @quantamagazine.bsky.social) structurally coherent if:
-Emergence requires a substrate
-Quantization presupposes an ontology
-Spacetime cannot be both
-Not without conflating representational levels
🧪 ⚛️ #philsci #philsky
My inexpert coda: not only does the human-centered desire for events to exist commonly cause confusion in the interpretation of relativity, it is the primary cause of ontological confusion in quantum mechanics as well.
That idea has shaped physics for over a century. But when you look closely, it doesn’t hold together.
This article explains what goes wrong.
Read here: cosmicave.org/links/
My inexpert coda: not only does the human-centered desire for events to exist commonly cause confusion in the interpretation of relativity, it is the primary cause of ontological confusion in quantum mechanics as well.