5th most-cited legal historian, 2019-23
Book: The People’s Courts. Next: A Faithful President: The Founders v. the Originalists
http://shugerblog.com
http://ssrn.com/author=625422
Special thanks to @janemanners.bsky.social
papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....
I’ll be following.
One starting point for lawyers is the excellent Cook reply/supplemental brief, which chiefly relies on @janemanners.bsky.social @levmenand.bsky.social (and also cites some of my work)
www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/25...
I’ll be following.
One starting point for lawyers is the excellent Cook reply/supplemental brief, which chiefly relies on @janemanners.bsky.social @levmenand.bsky.social (and also cites some of my work)
www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/25...
"Of course, I would never criticize the King. I'm merely critical of the King's corrupt and faithless ministers and advisors."
"Of course, I would never criticize the King. I'm merely critical of the King's corrupt and faithless ministers and advisors."
Jalen Brunson
Giannis Antetokounmpo
Tyrese Maxey
Cade Cunningham
Jaylen Brown
Jalen Brunson
Giannis Antetokounmpo
Tyrese Maxey
Cade Cunningham
Jaylen Brown
Mike Rappaport, prominent originalist unitary theorist, admirably updated his views:
Article II does not imply a removal power.
He makes a case for presidential policy control instead.
blog.dividedargument.com/p/guest-post...
Mike Rappaport, prominent originalist unitary theorist, admirably updated his views:
Article II does not imply a removal power.
He makes a case for presidential policy control instead.
blog.dividedargument.com/p/guest-post...
Mike Rappaport, prominent originalist unitary theorist, admirably updated his views:
Article II does not imply a removal power.
He makes a case for presidential policy control instead.
blog.dividedargument.com/p/guest-post...
"In New Light on the Decision of 1789 (forthcoming July 2006), I argue that the removal debates do not reveal the existence of any majority clearly opposed to ***congressional regulation*** of the removal power."
"In New Light on the Decision of 1789 (forthcoming July 2006), I argue that the removal debates do not reveal the existence of any majority clearly opposed to ***congressional regulation*** of the removal power."
@bostonu.bsky.social @bulaw.bsky.social
Weds 4:20 to 6:20:
Starting 1/21: @johnfabianwitt.bsky.social presenting his outstanding new book "The Radical Fund"
Then @sherifgirgis.bsky.social @beaubaumann.bsky.social & more:
@bostonu.bsky.social @bulaw.bsky.social
Weds 4:20 to 6:20:
Starting 1/21: @johnfabianwitt.bsky.social presenting his outstanding new book "The Radical Fund"
Then @sherifgirgis.bsky.social @beaubaumann.bsky.social & more:
I don’t recommend watching them. It’s obvious that this was an unjustified homicide, not self-defense.
But for the grace of G-d, she could have been any of us, just stuck in the snow.
I don’t recommend watching them. It’s obvious that this was an unjustified homicide, not self-defense.
But for the grace of G-d, she could have been any of us, just stuck in the snow.
1. Hostile takeovers are a thing. From time immemorial.
2. Art II does not prohibit hostile takeovers of foreign countries.
3. Hostile takeovers have an "executive power" vibe.
4. Art II implies presidents have a hostile takeover power.
1. Hostile takeovers are a thing. From time immemorial.
2. Art II does not prohibit hostile takeovers of foreign countries.
3. Hostile takeovers have an "executive power" vibe.
4. Art II implies presidents have a hostile takeover power.
For me personally, I will start calling them Worrier 1, Worrier 2, and Reverse Worrier.
For me personally, I will start calling them Worrier 1, Worrier 2, and Reverse Worrier.
Aggressive orange males defeat cooperative blue males
Cooperative blue males defeat sneaky yellow males
Sneaky yellowmales defeat aggressive orange males
Mate and repeat.
This Diminutive Reptile Plays Rock-Paper-Scissors www.nytimes.com/2026/01/01/s...
Aggressive orange males defeat cooperative blue males
Cooperative blue males defeat sneaky yellow males
Sneaky yellowmales defeat aggressive orange males
Mate and repeat.
This Diminutive Reptile Plays Rock-Paper-Scissors www.nytimes.com/2026/01/01/s...
Just one star.
Literally.
Just one star.
Literally.
If Wemby and Fox can stay healthy, they’re the new favorites to win the title.
And not long after we declared the start of a Thunder dynasty, could this be the start of a new Spurs dynasty?
If Wemby and Fox can stay healthy, they’re the new favorites to win the title.
And not long after we declared the start of a Thunder dynasty, could this be the start of a new Spurs dynasty?
You can see our reporting here: www.propublica.org/series/depor...
You can see our reporting here: www.propublica.org/series/depor...
(Even if you're not a sports fan, see if you can spot the sentence with the obvious factual/mathematical contradiction).
(Even if you're not a sports fan, see if you can spot the sentence with the obvious factual/mathematical contradiction).
The Roberts Court seems to have a Colonel Nathan Jessup theory of presidentialism:
They want immunity & unchecked power on that Wall.
They NEED immunity & unchecked power on that Wall.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=9FnO...
The Roberts Court seems to have a Colonel Nathan Jessup theory of presidentialism:
They want immunity & unchecked power on that Wall.
They NEED immunity & unchecked power on that Wall.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=9FnO...
None of the Jews you know are ambassadors from the state of Israel.
We are no more responsible for the Israeli govt than you are for the Russian or British govt or the Palestinian Authority...
Don't ask us to make a special declaration or whatever to end this conflict.
Yes, I have experienced this kind of request.
From a law professor.
As if I were the ambassador from the state of Israel because I wear a kipa.
None of the Jews you know are ambassadors from the state of Israel.
We are no more responsible for the Israeli govt than you are for the Russian or British govt or the Palestinian Authority...
Don't ask us to make a special declaration or whatever to end this conflict.