Professor. Comparative law/legal languages/legal history/constitutional studies/law & globalisation. Academic "humour". Posts indicate satire, perplexity or whatever. Opinions are my own, unfortunately.
https://ssrn.com/author=933550 ..
more
Professor. Comparative law/legal languages/legal history/constitutional studies/law & globalisation. Academic "humour". Posts indicate satire, perplexity or whatever. Opinions are my own, unfortunately.
https://ssrn.com/author=933550
— William Twining, Jurist in Context (2019)
Reposted by Amir Attaran, Jaakko Husa
When you receive the final proofs of your own book or article, it can be a wonderful feeling: wow, this looks absolutely wonderful! Of course, the feeling only lasts until the text is published and the first typo catches your eye...
The Northern Lights look much better in photos than in reality. Camera amplify the faint light and is more colour sensitive than human eye.
Birth of the American Sturmabteilung (SA) in the form of ICE.
I thought that that the Nazi stormtroopers were a thing of the past.
My bad.
Reposted by Anne Applebaum, Elizabeth Saunders, Nandita Sharma , and 40 more Anne Applebaum, Elizabeth Saunders, Nandita Sharma, Richard S.J. Tol, Stephan Lewandowsky, Joe R. Feagin, Jonathan A. Foley, Brett J. Baker, Steve Peers, John McLaren, Andreas Ortmann, Steven S. Smith, Diane Ravitch, Melissa Johnson, Sarah E. Gollust, Colin Harvey, Melissa R. Michelson, Juan Cole, Alison Phipps, Jaakko Husa, Michael Kevane, Laurent Pech, W. Andy Knight, Ben Tonra, Gerald Friedman, Tom Griffin, Stacy D. VanDeveer, Margot C. Finn, Juan Moreno‐Cruz, Julia M. Wright, Dana R. Fisher, José Antonio Noguera, Christian Fisch, Henry Jones, Sharon Erickson Nepstad, Seth Masket, Matthew P. McAllister, Manisha Sinha, Nathan P. Kalmoe, Martin S. Flaherty, Timothy D. McBride, David Darmofal, Anne Hilborn
The President must end this operation. Pull the thousands of violent, untrained officers out of Minnesota. Now.
Reposted by Brian Sloan
Reposted by Cheryl Saunders
It will be of great interest to legal historians.
This convention, they argue, constrains ambition, sidelines critique, and conflates near-term feasibility with rigor.