Interests: Math. Engineering. Engineering Games. 3d printing and industrial design. Education.
Job: SRE at a tech company working on L7 Networking & Load Balancing.
I had to tweak it a bit, note the years scale only goes up to 1e7, not 1e9, because with even just 40000-6000 sites we hit breakeven odds in less than 8 million years.
What can we conclude?
tangled.sh/@elucidating...
Or, you know. Talk to people.
we recently saw the RSF do exactly this in El Fasher in Sudan.
creatives/experts see "AI" as underperforming hype, techies see it overperforming
But given what I've heard from SpaceX, maybe this would make it worse?
But given what I've heard from SpaceX, maybe this would make it worse?
What's fascinating is *how absurdly wrong* Musk is in his prediction here. It isn't even close, a full e^iπ off from the right direction. Even a wide-eyed AI proponent would know that.
Yesterday over on x:
They removed dim mode because the overhead of CSS variables was too much
AI will skip coding and write binaries directly by end of year
What's fascinating is *how absurdly wrong* Musk is in his prediction here. It isn't even close, a full e^iπ off from the right direction. Even a wide-eyed AI proponent would know that.
But watching folks melt down over rising AI competence, even to the modest level it has, makes me wonder, could it be the other way around?
But watching folks melt down over rising AI competence, even to the modest level it has, makes me wonder, could it be the other way around?
“I hate to say it. It’s likely over for us.”