Elizabeth Potter Graham, JD
banner
elizabethpgraham.bsky.social
Elizabeth Potter Graham, JD
@elizabethpgraham.bsky.social
Retired family & criminal court attorney
Member, Alabama Reproductive Rights Advocates
Photos were taken in 1978 and c. 1926.
Married with adult children.
Don't follow me just to ask for money or show your naked body.
Quote skeet at your own risk.
Pinned
This is the image of the Republican National Convention which I will never forget.
An organization intended to benefit children should not conform to Donald Trump's wishes.
February 5, 2026 at 7:38 AM
I hope Ms. Le has civil service protection. Does that still exist?
February 5, 2026 at 6:13 AM
Reposted by Elizabeth Potter Graham, JD
NEW: The unfathomable Minnesota transcript that must be read, as it tells the reality of America today.

"I am not white, as you can see," Julie Le โ€” a government lawyer โ€” told a federal judge on Tuesday. "And my family's at risk as any other people that might get picked up too ..."

Law Dork:
The unfathomable Minnesota transcript that must be read, as it tells the reality of America today
"I am not white, as you can see," Julie Le โ€” a government lawyer โ€” told a federal judge on Tuesday. "And my family's at risk as any other people that might get picked up too ..."
www.lawdork.com
February 5, 2026 at 4:59 AM
Reposted by Elizabeth Potter Graham, JD
So (7) says to preserveโ€”but strikes me more as createโ€”the right of state and local govts to file criminal charges in excessive force cases.

Details will matter, but if thatโ€™s a statutory waiver of supremacy clause immunity, that strikes me as potentially a REALLY big deal.
Schumer & Jeffries lay out the Democratic demands for a DHS funding deal in a letter to the top Republican leaders
February 5, 2026 at 3:28 AM
Reposted by Elizabeth Potter Graham, JD
Schumer & Jeffries lay out the Democratic demands for a DHS funding deal in a letter to the top Republican leaders
February 5, 2026 at 2:35 AM
I understand that it is illegal for the CIA to do surveillance or perform law enforcement functions on Americans. Oh well.
February 5, 2026 at 3:00 AM
No paywall version:

www.msn.com/en-us/news/w...
February 5, 2026 at 2:35 AM
Reposted by Elizabeth Potter Graham, JD
one of my strongest beliefs is that we're in our situation right now bc some of the most prominent talking heads (e.g. joe rogan, andrew schulz) are learning about politics in their 40s and 50s, instead of their teens and early 20s, and we have to go along for the ride as they learn basic things
February 4, 2026 at 10:10 PM
Please fact check before posting. The information contained in this meme is false.

www.snopes.com/fact-check/t...
Did Trump Pay $35M to Settle Child Rape Claims Against Him?
An "utterly deranged nutter with a mind unclouded by facts, evidence, or reason" may not be the best of sources.
www.snopes.com
February 5, 2026 at 12:42 AM
The same. He represented himself at trial. While I understand that defendants have that option, I think there was no justice in this case. I would have used Routh's mental health as a defense.
February 5, 2026 at 12:39 AM
Children need to pool their allowances and birthday gift money and hire a lobbyist.
February 5, 2026 at 12:02 AM
You really have no idea how the process of amending the US Constitution works, do you?
February 5, 2026 at 12:00 AM
February 4, 2026 at 11:57 PM
The lawyer who signed the letter is on Bluesky! @andrewbakaj.bsky.social
February 4, 2026 at 11:56 PM
It's our nation's funeral.
February 4, 2026 at 11:33 PM
There appears to be black paint on the wall in the top right photo. It appears to be an abstract version of the human digestive tract, centering on a stomach.
February 4, 2026 at 11:30 PM
There isn't any need for ICE to show up at polling places, unless they want to arrest the cleaning staff.
February 4, 2026 at 8:27 PM
I gather that this could have been a shadow docket decision, but SCOTUS declined.

I hope SCOTUS won't rule against Newsom in late June.

bsky.app/profile/kyle...
JUST IN: SCOTUS declines to take up challenge to Gov. Newsom's redistricting effort in California.
February 4, 2026 at 8:23 PM
Was this a shadow docket decision? Will a final judgment be issued after briefs and oral argument?
February 4, 2026 at 7:25 PM
Please explain how you determined this. I have wondered how this could happen.
February 4, 2026 at 7:17 PM
Reposted by Elizabeth Potter Graham, JD
The Epstein Files

Follow my work and writing on Substack: nickanderson.substack.com
February 4, 2026 at 7:04 PM