My bots: @icymilaw.org, @news.bot.suffolklitlab.org & @lolscotus.bsky.social
Has anyone seen/written a paper on how statistical significance is a burden of proof, and so the law's mindless focus on significance for admissibility effectively imposes the SAME burden on BOTH parties, in civil AND crim cases alike?
Has anyone seen/written a paper on how statistical significance is a burden of proof, and so the law's mindless focus on significance for admissibility effectively imposes the SAME burden on BOTH parties, in civil AND crim cases alike?
When law students ask me what to take in undergrad, my usual answer is "anything, really."
But probably a better answer would be "it might be helpful to grab a statistics class or two."
When law students ask me what to take in undergrad, my usual answer is "anything, really."
But probably a better answer would be "it might be helpful to grab a statistics class or two."
Thanks @aspendigital.bsky.social for taking this on!
Clear definitions shape real-world outcomes. Check out the full handbook here 👉
https://ow.ly/gi7y50YbPvJ
Thanks @aspendigital.bsky.social for taking this on!
This reports directly to me, & I’m looking for a practical & flexible technical expert with excellent communication & coaching skills, who is excited to do both. More below...
Just don’t believe your eyes
It’s our blood and bones
And these whistles and phones
Against Miller and Noem’s dirty lies"
Art matters. Stay free.
Just don’t believe your eyes
It’s our blood and bones
And these whistles and phones
Against Miller and Noem’s dirty lies"
Art matters. Stay free.
Stay free
Stay free
Follow @klasfeldreports.com @chrisgeidner.bsky.social @rparloff.bsky.social and no doubt others for the latest
"I appreciate that answer, Mr. Carter. I think it goes without saying that we’re in shockingly unusual times."