Writing here: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/cf_dev/AbsByAuth.cfm?per_id=1569375
Palsgraf.
what a magnificent streak. is it about duty or causation? idk, down the rabbit hole we go!
Palsgraf.
what a magnificent streak. is it about duty or causation? idk, down the rabbit hole we go!
Contrary to popular belief, unless you are deeply selfish, being happy does not lead to inaction. Depression and fear lead to inaction. Anger leads to rash, destructive, self-serving action.
Contrary to popular belief, unless you are deeply selfish, being happy does not lead to inaction. Depression and fear lead to inaction. Anger leads to rash, destructive, self-serving action.
www.health.harvard.edu/diseases-and...
www.health.harvard.edu/diseases-and...
BTW, as of this morning, it looks like all the case counts for 2024-25 have been scrubbed from the CDC website 🫠
BTW, as of this morning, it looks like all the case counts for 2024-25 have been scrubbed from the CDC website 🫠
The work IS the joy for me. I don’t want to be able to snap my fingers and have a completed “product.” I want to be transformed by the process. I’m an author but I do this because I enjoy the rigor of being a writer.
The work IS the joy for me. I don’t want to be able to snap my fingers and have a completed “product.” I want to be transformed by the process. I’m an author but I do this because I enjoy the rigor of being a writer.
At some point, a journalist needs to ask Johnson “you regularly claim you have no idea what your own government is doing. If we take you at your word, how are you so poorly informed, and do you this level of ignorance should disqualify you as speaker?”
MIKE JOHNSON: I don't know what you're talking about with the children. I haven't seen that so I'm not going to comment on it.
At some point, a journalist needs to ask Johnson “you regularly claim you have no idea what your own government is doing. If we take you at your word, how are you so poorly informed, and do you this level of ignorance should disqualify you as speaker?”
An amicus brief in Vanda v. United States, on federal agencies' legal authority to use & disclose private trade secrets.
A case you probably haven't heard of, but with major consequences for federal regulation!
🧵
1/
An amicus brief in Vanda v. United States, on federal agencies' legal authority to use & disclose private trade secrets.
A case you probably haven't heard of, but with major consequences for federal regulation!
🧵
1/
GOD: Yes
CHOTINER: In Your image
GOD: Yes
CHOTINER: And sometimes we do bad things
GOD: Oh Yes
CHOTINER: And then you send plagues and floods
GOD: OK I think I see where you are going with this
GOD: Yes
CHOTINER: In Your image
GOD: Yes
CHOTINER: And sometimes we do bad things
GOD: Oh Yes
CHOTINER: And then you send plagues and floods
GOD: OK I think I see where you are going with this