Mark Coeckelbergh
banner
coeckelbergh.bsky.social
Mark Coeckelbergh
@coeckelbergh.bsky.social

Philosopher of technology | Professor at Philosophy Department University of Vienna | Author of AI Ethics, The Political Philosophy of AI, and Why AI Undermines Democracy | https://coeckelbergh.net

Mark Coeckelbergh is a Belgian philosopher of technology. He is Professor of Philosophy of Media and Technology at the Department of Philosophy of the University of Vienna. He currently holds the ERA Chair at the Institute of Philosophy of the Czech Academy of Sciences in Prague and is Guest Professor at WASP-HS and University of Uppsala. .. more

Neuroscience 42%
Computer science 15%

Greetings from Tokyo, where I will do a keynote at the Business-University Forum of Japan

Reposted by Mark Coeckelbergh

Judge a book by its cover.
The book that @coeckelbergh.bsky.social and I wrote on #LLMs and #GenAI --"Communicative #AI" @politybooks.bsky.social--is featured on the @betterimagesofai.bsky.social blog.

blog.betterimagesofai.org/better-image...

Reposted by Mark Coeckelbergh

Reposted by Mark Coeckelbergh

Talking soon at the CultTech summit in Vienna. Keynote on generative AI and the future of creativity

www.culttechsummit.com
CultTech Summit 2025 - 22-23 October 2025 in Vienna
Join the largest and most impactful CultTech event in Europe ➤ for tech and arts professionals, startups, investors & creatives
www.culttechsummit.com

New article published
link.springer.com/article/10.1...
Politiquette: Liberalism, identity, and free speech on AI-powered digital social media - Ethics and Information Technology
How can liberal thinking deal with identity and recognition matters in politics? This long-standing question in political philosophy has gained new relevance and urgency in the face of issues concerning offense and censorship in digital social media, especially in the light of the use of AI. Typically, there are two competing views on this issue: a classical liberal one, according to which identity has no place in politics and free speech is paramount, and the more recent view that personal and group identity and recognition should be important, if not central, in liberal politics (for example when it comes to issues of justice) and that free speech should be regulated accordingly, for instance to avoid offense and create safe online spaces. The latter view has become increasingly popular among left liberals, but also stretches or, according to some, transgresses, the boundaries of liberalism. Usually, a mix of both positions is used to justify current digital tech policy. This paper proposes a third position, which is not just a mix of both positions but which is conceptually more innovative: making a distinction between politics and politiquette, which in analogy to etiquette is about “soft” values and norms such as respect, moderation, openness, and tolerance as opposed to “hard” political rights and liberal political principles such as freedom and justice, it argues that identity and recognition claims have a place in politiquette (next to the private sphere) and that politiquette helps to create the conditions for politics but is not itself political. Whatever other “hard” reasons there may be to create such conditions, politiquette is one sufficient reason. In this way, the paper attempts to carve out a conceptual space for identity and recognition, while retaining a liberal position. After outlining the position, a discussion of potential objections enables further clarification and refinement of the position as well as more engagement with relevant contemporary work.
link.springer.com

Today I talk about “Technology as process” at the ontology congress in San Sebastián

www.ontologia.info/es/index.php
2025 Edition
International Ontology Congress
www.ontologia.info