Marco Battaglini
Marco Battaglini
@battaglini.bsky.social
Reposted by Marco Battaglini
Forthcoming article "Tax Professionals and Tax Evasion” by @battaglini.bsky.social Luigi Guiso @chiaralac.bsky.social and Eleonora Patacchini
@eeanews.bsky.social

doi.org/10.1093/jeea...

Teaching materials available: www.eeassoc.org/teaching-mat...
Tax Professionals and Tax Evasion
Abstract. Using unique data covering the entire population of sole proprietorships in Italy with their respective audit files, we examine the role of tax a
doi.org
January 29, 2026 at 6:20 AM
6/
The result: evasion is not just an individual decision.
It is mediated by professional networks, with important implications for how audit policies should be designed and evaluated.
December 19, 2025 at 5:05 PM
5/
Advisors differ in their willingness to play this role.
This heterogeneity creates a market for intermediated tax evasion, where taxpayers sort themselves based on how tolerant advisors are of evasion.
December 19, 2025 at 5:05 PM
4/
Exploiting quasi-random variation in audit policy, we find that tax advisors act as information hubs.
They learn about audit intensity from experience and incorporate this information into their clients’ tax strategies.
December 19, 2025 at 5:05 PM
3/
Using population-wide data on all Italian sole proprietors, matched with audits and tax advisors, we show that some advisors actively serve clients who intend to evade taxes.
December 19, 2025 at 5:05 PM
2/
The traditional view: tax advisors mainly provide technical expertise, helping taxpayers interpret complex tax laws.
Our evidence shows that some advisors play a much broader role.
December 19, 2025 at 5:05 PM
1/
My paper with @EleonoraPatacc2, @guiso_luigi, and @chiaralac, “Tax Professionals and Tax Evasion,” is finally out.
academic.oup.com/jeea/article...
If you are interested in social networks and fiscal policy, this one is for you. 🧵
Tax Professionals and Tax Evasion*
Abstract. Using unique data covering the entire population of sole proprietorships in Italy with their respective audit files, we examine the role of tax a
academic.oup.com
December 19, 2025 at 5:05 PM
In the Volunteer Dilemma, more players can reduce the chance of success—yet paradoxically, per capita utility still always rises. But inefficiency per person vanishes slower than 1/n, so aggregate inefficiency grows without bound!
Just published in @jpube.bsky.social

"Welfare in the volunteer’s dilemma"

By @battaglini.bsky.social & Thomas Palfrey

www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...

#econsky
May 24, 2025 at 3:35 PM
In these examples they have 2 friends.
May 7, 2025 at 6:34 PM
I definitely agree: do not insult the referees before you submit, wait after the reports! 😈
After being an editor for 6.5 years (4 REStud; 2.5 JEEA), I have accumulated a few suggestions that can help you avoid unnecessary rejections.
April 10, 2025 at 9:46 PM
4/
So if you’ve got something in the works, consider submitting there.
We had a great experience!.
April 10, 2025 at 8:40 PM
3/
Also — shoutout to JPubE!
The editor and the referees were great 🙏...and the entire process was fast and efficient.
April 10, 2025 at 8:40 PM
2/
We study how welfare outcomes are shaped in strategic environments where individuals must decide whether to bear a cost for the public good — or hope someone else does. Classic dilemma, new insights. 😏
April 10, 2025 at 8:40 PM
🧵 New paper drop!
1/
Free access to our new article:
"Welfare in the Volunteer's Dilemma"
Joint with T. Palfrey.
📖 Free access: authors.elsevier.com/c/1ktgWAlw9~...
April 10, 2025 at 8:40 PM
Reposted by Marco Battaglini
Hours after the White House froze dozens of grants to Princeton, I sat down with its president.

I hope you’ll listen to our conversation about free speech, academic freedom, and cuts to research funding.

We also discussed Columbia’s concessions and the detention of Tufts student Rumeysa Öztürk.
Princeton’s President Responds to Attacks on Higher Education
Big Take · Episode
open.spotify.com
April 1, 2025 at 11:43 PM
Reposted by Marco Battaglini
Honestly, you should probably just read this fascinating interview while you wait for somebody to return your keys to you.
www.jstor.org
February 18, 2025 at 8:41 PM
Post muto, post festivo.
January 3, 2025 at 3:30 PM
Well you cite a number from the paper and apply it where it should note applied. If I misunderstood your statement, then good and sorry, I misunderstood it.
November 25, 2024 at 6:29 PM
I was referring to the statement that you did not believe the results of the paper. The paper is not about presidential races.
November 25, 2024 at 6:27 PM
Then, my friend, you should read the paper instead of writing an ignorant opinion.
I very much doubt that Musk had 2.5pp effect on Trump's vote share.
November 25, 2024 at 6:22 PM
Looking for a great political economy model? George Saunders offers you five, complete with reading comprehension questions and problem sets. Check it out:
Five Thought Experiments Concerning the Underlying Disease
Our civic wells are poisoned. Why?
www.newyorker.com
November 25, 2024 at 2:42 PM
I did it and it worked.
November 25, 2024 at 12:29 AM
RT @m_battaglini: So Trump’s new Department of Government Efficiency has…

*wait for it*

Two co-chairs.

Yup, the satires write themselves.
November 14, 2024 at 1:42 PM
FT book award winner Edmondson referring to the Gino debacle: "...lays out some possible paths for improvement, such as reducing pressure for academics to publish more studies." A masterclass on how to draw the wrong conclusions from the case. ft.com/content/0107...
December 6, 2023 at 2:55 PM