http://elliotlipnowski.com/
@elliotlip.bsky.social @doronravid.bsky.social @samkapon.bsky.social
@elliotlip.bsky.social @doronravid.bsky.social @samkapon.bsky.social
by Susan Collins
by Susan Collins
[Note, this is harder than the question of which X are complete *sub*lattices, and is much harder than the question of which X are lattices.]
[Note, this is harder than the question of which X are complete *sub*lattices, and is much harder than the question of which X are lattices.]
a) For square-integrable RVs (L2) via a super easy Hilbert space argument.
b) For integral RVs (L1, a bigger class) via Radon-Nikodym—harder!
But (a) can actually prove (b)!
a) For square-integrable RVs (L2) via a super easy Hilbert space argument.
b) For integral RVs (L1, a bigger class) via Radon-Nikodym—harder!
But (a) can actually prove (b)!
Please Quote this with your most minor celebrity interaction
LEAVITT: Yes, we do. Let me find it for you. Thank you. Um. We do not.