Anna Dart
annaedart.bsky.social
Anna Dart
@annaedart.bsky.social
Chief Editor of Nature Reviews Cancer

Views are my own
Check out our latest Focus issue highlighting why the mechanisms of ageing, which contribute to cancer development, progression & treatment are so important in our rapidly ageing global population 👇
September 24, 2025 at 12:58 PM
Reposted by Anna Dart
#Comment 🚨
Asghar&Chung highlight cancer applications of digital twins, integrating molecular data & drug responses to inform personalized treatment & accelerate drug development through clinical trial simulation.
📖⬇️
Application of digital twins for personalized oncology - Nature Reviews Cancer
Digital twins are virtual representations that evolve over time with new data inputs. In this Comment, Asghar and Chung describe cancer applications of digital twins that include the integration of molecular information and individual drug responses of patients, and explain how they can inform individualized treatment, accelerate drug development through clinical trial simulation and enable the exploration of multiscale relationships in the entire human body to drive new therapeutic discoveries.
bit.ly
July 16, 2025 at 2:20 PM
Reposted by Anna Dart
#Review 🚨
Henry & DeGregori @jdegregori.bsky.social‬ discuss models and methods used to study the connection between ageing and cancer, advocating advocating for the wider adoption of age-appropriate models of cancer to improve clinical translation
📖⬇️
Modelling the ageing dependence of cancer evolutionary trajectories - Nature Reviews Cancer
In this Review, Henry and DeGregori discuss the contributions of the various models and methods used to study the connection between ageing and cancer, highlighting the strengths and limitations of those models and technologies, as well as advocating for the wider adoption of age-appropriate models of cancer to improve our clinical translation of approaches to prevent and treat human cancers.
bit.ly
July 17, 2025 at 2:25 PM
Reposted by Anna Dart
#Perspective 🚨
Lazure and Gomes argue that metabolic changes that occur as a result of #ageing may shape tumour initiation and progression and the development of metastatic disease.
⬇️ 📖
https://bit.ly/3IkNY...
@moffittnews.bsky.social‬
Cancer progression through the lens of age-induced metabolic reprogramming - Nature Reviews Cancer
In this Perspective, Lazure and Gomes argue that metabolic changes that occur as a result of ageing may shape tumour initiation and progression and the development of metastatic disease.
bit.ly
July 18, 2025 at 10:29 AM
Reposted by Anna Dart
Perspective 🚨
Orsolya Vincze @OVincze, Thomas Pradeu &Co discuss how cancer research can be advanced using comparative oncology and call for the increased use of non-conventional model organisms to advance cancer prevention and treatment.

📖 ⬇️
Advancing cancer research via comparative oncology - Nature Reviews Cancer
Comparative oncology combines evolutionary biology, ecology, veterinary medicine and clinical oncology to better understand cancer, for example, by identifying the molecular and cellular mechanisms underlying the remarkable cancer resistance of some taxa. Therefore, this Perspective by Vincze et al. calls for the increased use of non-conventional model organisms in cancer research to advance cancer prevention and treatment strategies.
bit.ly
July 3, 2025 at 1:30 PM
Reposted by Anna Dart
Our July issue is LIVE! 🌞🥵🏖️

It features articles on:
- Targeted protein degradation for cancer therapy
- Advances in therapeutic cancer vaccines
- The TGFβ paradox in HPV-driven cancer
- The paths to metastasis

Happy reading! 👇 📖
https://www.nature.c...
June 27, 2025 at 2:51 PM
Reposted by Anna Dart
Our June issue is now LIVE!🌞
It features articles on:
- Challenges of SCLC heterogeneity & phenotypic plasticity
- The fibroinflammatory response in #cancer
- Moonlighting functions of glucose metabolic enzymes & metabolites in cancer
- PIPKs in cancer
📖👇 www.nature.com/nrc/volumes/...
May 30, 2025 at 4:15 PM
Reposted by Anna Dart
I don't think I posted about this yet. COME WORK WITH US AT NATURE METHODS! This is a rare opportunity, and we can't wait for our new colleague. Feel free to contact me with questions.
Our colleagues at the Nature Research Cross-Journal Editorial team are also hiring for two new positions! 👇

Metabolism/cancer/aging/immunology/cell bio:
springernature.wd3.myworkdayjobs.com/SpringerNatu...

Neuroscience/genetics/genomics/mol bio:
springernature.wd3.myworkdayjobs.com/SpringerNatu...
May 21, 2025 at 2:19 PM
I'll be there, so make sure you sign up for what promises to be a fantastic meeting!
Free to attend Nature conference in collaboration with @mdanderson.bsky.social exploring breakthroughs in understanding the #tumour ecosystem and its influence in #cancer development, progression, diagnosis & treatment
👉https://go.nature.com/44vavDt
May 16, 2025 at 9:08 AM
What an honour to be part of this meeting! Fantastic scientists and clinicians in a fantastic setting, brainstorming how to advance this field and find life-saving cures for patients with glioblastoma.
Thank you to participants of "Glioblastoma" for productive and invigorating discussions, with special thanks to organizers Drs. Melissa Bondy, Peter Dirks, and Bill Weiss. We are grateful to the @cshlnews.bsky.social - @northwellhealth.bsky.social Affiliation for support.

Agenda: bit.ly/GBM-25
April 17, 2025 at 6:32 PM
And the moment you have all been waiting for...our top downloaded article of 2024! 👏 Well worth a read!
February 14, 2025 at 7:13 PM
And just off the top spot....👇
February 13, 2025 at 6:43 PM
And the countdown begins again this week with number 5...👇
February 10, 2025 at 7:52 PM
And in at number 6 👇 Top 5 coming next week! 👏 Exciting!
February 7, 2025 at 7:19 PM
And at number 7....👇
February 6, 2025 at 7:40 PM
And in at number 9....👇
February 4, 2025 at 8:59 PM
Well worth a read! Hanahan et al. argue that many normal cell types are hard-wired with latent functions that can be triggered to prevent inappropriate immune attack. An intrinsic capability that is co-opted by tumours 👇
January 29, 2025 at 7:35 PM
Reposted by Anna Dart
Roughly 6,000 readers answered our poll, with many declaring that Bluesky was nicer, kinder and less antagonistic to science than X

https://go.nature.com/42tH8Ai
Bluesky’s science takeover: 70% of Nature poll respondents use platform
Roughly 6,000 readers answered our poll, with many declaring that Bluesky was nicer, kinder and less antagonistic to science than X.
go.nature.com
January 24, 2025 at 11:52 AM
Reposted by Anna Dart
Welcome immigrants from X interested in science to the friendlier skies of @bsky.app, as documented by a new @nature.com survey (but you already knew that 😉)
"Bluesky is much better for science. There is much less toxicity, misinformation, and distractions."
www.nature.com/articles/d41...
January 24, 2025 at 3:22 PM