Andres Guadamuz
banner
technollama.bsky.social
Andres Guadamuz
@technollama.bsky.social

Law and technology academic. Posts about copyright law, internet regulation, AI, llamas, pandas, and cats. Dual Tico-British citizen.
https://www.technollama.co.uk/

Business 38%
Computer science 27%

I used to enjoy spending time on Reddit, but nowadays I can feel my brains melting every time I go there, some previously thoughtful spaces have devolved into mindless meme war. Haw modern discourse degraded into endless memetic gotchas?

Bad Bunny. Damn. O mejor dicho, carajo!
I made a map of 3.4 million Bluesky users - see if you can find yourself!

bluesky-map.theo.io

I've seen some similar projects, but IMO this seems to better capture some of the fine-grained detail
Bluesky Map
Interactive map of 3.4 million Bluesky users, visualised by their follower pattern.
bluesky-map.theo.io

I notice Bluesky is having another normal one about AI (I could repost this twice a month and it would still apply),

Really? Please elaborate.

Yes, I'm getting some sense that a lot of this stuff is automated, I mean, how did you find me in the first place? Can't you google? Even ChatGPT knows where I work 🤖

I should add that he's communicating with me with my work email. I guess the sussex dot ac dot uk address is mystifying.

Person sends me a request for me to supervise him for a PhD at the University of Hertfordshire. I do not work there, so I tell him. He then replies, and I quote:

"Could you kindly let me know which university you are currently affiliated with?"

Not PhD material I'm afraid.

Biggest new tell-tale sign of AI use in law essays, the paper ends with a section entitled "Policy implications" or "Policy reform".

I've been tempted...

One trick is to see which references aren't picked up by Turnitin, most references have been cited before by someone else and are highlighted, those which are not may be hallucinated.

No resources to do stuff like that. There are a bunch of other assessment methods I may try in the future, but the essay is dead. I have to assume from now on that all essays are AI.

And finally, I haven't seen a single em-dash, it's evident that word got around that this was a common LLM trait.

Another interesting side effect, the overall quality of essays has gone up. Most years there would be a noticeable curve, with some extremely poor essays. I have yet to read a truly bad essay, AI has helped the worst students write better essays (or wrote it for them).

Something I noticed is just how much the LLMs have improved. Long gone are the days of "delve", "intricate", "complexities" and other common words. Reasoning is more sophisticated and harder to spot.

But the biggest sign was the prevalence of hallucinations. At least 20% of essays had hallucinated references, and those are the ones I caught, I'm sure a few more may have escaped. This is the practice I punished more with points deductions as I warned them repeatedly about it.

How do I know? I ran my essay questions through ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Deepseek and Qwen, so I know what the LLMs will answer, and I could know with high degree of confidence which model they used. There were also some quirks, ChatGPT kept adding US law concepts to a UK question.

I've now marked enough essays this year that I can make a good assessment of where we stand with AI use. I'm pretty sure that a vast majority of students are using AI in some shape or form, but the quality of the essays has also improved in average if I'm marking the works as they are.

Home with the flu, how can my head hold so much mucus?

Fun, not my first time, teaching an introduction to the technology for my IP PG module.

Me during the first week of teaching AI.
a close up of a man 's face with the words i 've seen things you people wouldn 't believe
Alt: a close up of a man 's face with the words i 've seen things you people wouldn 't believe
media.tenor.com

Sony Music of course!

My first hallucinated case of the marking season! Did you know that Sony Music sued Napster UK in 2000 and that the case was appealed in 2001?
recorded a Windows 95 full disk defrag to soothe your timeline.

You've hit on the problem, the work isn't being reprinted or communicated to the public, it's added to billions other works to train a model, which is not a derivative of the work by any theory of copyright.
Judgements across the world are starting to find that.

My last FOSDEM was Amsterdam 2013, wow, time flies.

Is there anything more satisfying than sending out final edits on an article or a book chapter?

I know, I lead a sad life.

We don't have rulings in other countries on this point, but we have art4 CDSM in the EU. Also private copying is aloud, and the copies aren't communicated to the public, information is extracted from them.

"The court also agreed that buying and digitizing books is transformative because “every purchased print copy was copied in order to save storage space and to enable searchability as a digital copy.”
www.whitecase.com/insight-aler...
Two California District Judges Rule That Using Books to Train AI is Fair Use | White & Case LLP
Two days apart, two judges in the Northern District of California decided on summary judgment that two examples of using copyrighted works to train AI models were transformative, and ultimately fair u...
www.whitecase.com