Pentagon, Anthropic Clash Over AI

Scholar power: 6.3%

Story's scientific field profile

Computer science 40%, Political science 25%, Law 20%, Philosophy 15%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Sebastián Galiani	3%	49	6.3%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

46.0%

9.6 h

0

6.3%

Ranking score

0.011

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

by Peter Gratton

7%

Scholar power: 7.2%

Story's scientific field profile

Computer science 40%, Political science 25%, Law 20%, Philosophy 15%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Peter Gratton	8%	9	7.2%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

48.0%

11.9 h

11

7.2%

Ranking score

0.013

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Peter Gratton

@petergratton.bsky.social

I read some of these AI pieces like a psychoanalyst would—what’s the desire that this answers to?

February 19, 2026 at 1:17 AM

by Simon Chesterman

32%

Scholar power: 32.7%

Story's scientific field profile

Computer science 40%, Political science 25%, Law 20%, Philosophy 15%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Simon Chesterman	19%	33	32.7%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

47.0%

12.0 h

0

32.7%

Ranking score

0.03

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Reposted by Dean Baker

0%

Scholar power: 0.5%

Story's scientific field profile

Computer science 40%, Political science 25%, Law 20%, Philosophy 15%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Dean Baker	1%	21	0.5%

Formula for scholar power: sum of each reposter's field match × √reposter's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

46.0%

13.0 h

2

0.5%

Ranking score

0.002

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

New York Times

Defense Department and Anthropic Square Off in Dispute Over A.I. Safety

How artificial intelligence will be used in future battlefields is an issue that has turned increasingly political and may put Anthropic in a bind.

Reposts 2 14h

by Justin Wolfers

4%

Scholar power: 4.6%

Story's scientific field profile

Computer science 40%, Political science 25%, Law 20%, Philosophy 15%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Justin Wolfers	2%	58	4.6%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

54.0%

14.2 h

317

4.6%

Ranking score

0.089

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Justin Wolfers

@justinwolfers.bsky.social

On Gen Z's (understandable!) anxiety: AI is likely to boost productivity, so we can create more with less. That likely creates a bigger pie. But a bigger pie won't pay the bills unless we figure out how to ensure that everyone gets a reasonable slice.

February 18, 2026 at 10:56 PM

by Gordon Pennycook Reposted by Johannes Breuer

31%

Scholar power: 31.6%

Story's scientific field profile

Computer science 40%, Political science 25%, Law 20%, Philosophy 15%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Gordon Pennycook	10%	71	25.3%
🎓 Johannes Breuer	12%	28	6.3%
Total			31.6%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index + sum of each reposter's field match × √reposter's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

50.0%

14.8 h

17

31.6%

Ranking score

0.059

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Gordon Pennycook

@gordpennycook.bsky.social

New paper in Current Directions in Psych Science: journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/...

After countless arguments about what tasks ppl should/should not offload to AI, we instead argue that genAI can be used *augment* research protocols in novel ways. I.e. use AI to make better psych experiments!

February 18, 2026 at 10:22 PM

by James F. McGrath

3%

Scholar power: 3.4%

Story's scientific field profile

Computer science 40%, Political science 25%, Law 20%, Philosophy 15%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 James F. McGrath	4%	8	3.4%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

48.0%

15.4 h

0

3.4%

Ranking score

0.003

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

James F. McGrath (ReligionProf)

@religionprof.bsky.social

Working with AI is more Mindset than Skill marcwatkins.substack.com/p/working-wi...

Working with AI is more Mindset than Skill

We need to teach skepticism and critical thinking as philosophical responses to machine intelligence.

marcwatkins.substack.com

February 18, 2026 at 9:45 PM

by James F. McGrath

3%

Scholar power: 3.4%

Story's scientific field profile

Computer science 40%, Political science 25%, Law 20%, Philosophy 15%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 James F. McGrath	4%	8	3.4%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

46.0%

15.7 h

0

3.4%

Ranking score

0.003

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

James F. McGrath (ReligionProf)

@religionprof.bsky.social

Conversation with Corrie Bergeron on AI and education

aiedusimplified.substack.com/p/screw-arou...

“...screw around with it. See what it does. And we have to do that, fearlessly.”

Part 1 of my interview with Corrie Bergeron

aiedusimplified.substack.com

February 18, 2026 at 9:30 PM

by Don Tapscott

12%

Scholar power: 12.0%

Story's scientific field profile

Computer science 40%, Political science 25%, Law 20%, Philosophy 15%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Don Tapscott	8%	25	12.0%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

53.0%

16.4 h

1

12.0%

Ranking score

0.013

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Don Tapscott

@dtapscott.bsky.social

In my recent feature on HBR IdeaCast, we unpack how AI agents are evolving into identic AI - personalized intelligence that reflects your judgment and executes with agency. A pivotal moment for leadership, organizations, and how we work.

hbr.org/podcast/2026...

With Rise of Agents, We Are Entering the World of Identic AI

A conversation with tech expert Don Tapscott about the potential for and pitfalls of identic AI.

hbr.org

February 18, 2026 at 8:44 PM

by Don Tapscott

12%

Scholar power: 12.0%

Story's scientific field profile

Computer science 40%, Political science 25%, Law 20%, Philosophy 15%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Don Tapscott	8%	25	12.0%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

55.0%

16.5 h

0

12.0%

Ranking score

0.013

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

by Stefan Rahmstorf

0%

Scholar power: 0.0%

Story's scientific field profile

Computer science 40%, Political science 25%, Law 20%, Philosophy 15%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Stefan Rahmstorf	0%	79	0.0%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

45.0%

16.5 h

103

0.0%

Ranking score

0.03

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Prof. Stefan Rahmstorf

@rahmstorf.bsky.social

Quite an eye-opening video about the tech bros by the inimitable ClimateAdam. Watch it. youtu.be/py0XpKxAnNU

Climate Scientist Reacts to AI Overlords

YouTube video by ClimateAdam

youtu.be

February 18, 2026 at 8:40 PM

by James F. McGrath

3%

Scholar power: 3.4%

Story's scientific field profile

Computer science 40%, Political science 25%, Law 20%, Philosophy 15%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 James F. McGrath	4%	8	3.4%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

56.0%

16.6 h

0

3.4%

Ranking score

0.005

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

James F. McGrath (ReligionProf)

@religionprof.bsky.social

This is your brain on AI…

February 18, 2026 at 8:37 PM

Reposted by Robb Willer

5%

Scholar power: 5.1%

Story's scientific field profile

Computer science 40%, Political science 25%, Law 20%, Philosophy 15%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Robb Willer	7%	54	5.1%

Formula for scholar power: sum of each reposter's field match × √reposter's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

49.0%

16.7 h

1

5.1%

Ranking score

0.004

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

by Hakan Yilmazkuday

0%

Scholar power: 0.0%

Story's scientific field profile

Computer science 40%, Political science 25%, Law 20%, Philosophy 15%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Hakan Yilmazkuday	0%	25	0.0%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

47.0%

16.7 h

0

0.0%

Ranking score

0.005

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

HAKAN YILMAZKUDAY

@yilmazkuday.bsky.social

"Artificial Intelligence and Labor Markets: Evidence from Google Trends" has been published at the Journal of Economics and Finance: doi.org/10.1007/s12197-025-... Free working paper version is available at dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.482...

February 18, 2026 at 8:30 PM

by Timnit Gebru

64%

Scholar power: 64.7%

Story's scientific field profile

Computer science 40%, Political science 25%, Law 20%, Philosophy 15%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Timnit Gebru	44%	24	64.7%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

49.0%

16.8 h

3

64.7%

Ranking score

0.047

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Timnit Gebru

@timnitgebru.bsky.social

From betterimagesofai.org

Better Images of AI

We are a non-profit creating more realistic and inclusive images of artificial intelligence. Visit our growing repository available for anyone to use for free under CC licences, or just to use as insp...

betterimagesofai.org

February 18, 2026 at 8:21 PM

by Alberto Acerbi

6%

Scholar power: 6.7%

Story's scientific field profile

Computer science 40%, Political science 25%, Law 20%, Philosophy 15%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Alberto Acerbi	4%	31	6.7%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

51.0%

17.2 h

2

6.7%

Ranking score

0.007

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Alberto Acerbi

@acerbialberto.com

Ironically, most comments here are supporting the claim of the article...
www.transformernews.ai/p/the-left-i...

The left is missing out on AI

As a movement, it has largely refused to engage seriously with AI, ceding debate about a threat and opportunity to the right

www.transformernews.ai

February 18, 2026 at 8:00 PM

Reposted by Peter Thorne

4%

Scholar power: 4%

Story's scientific field profile

Computer science 40%, Political science 25%, Law 20%, Philosophy 15%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Peter Thorne	-	57	-

Philip Boucher-Hayes

@philipb-h.bsky.social

Each week on #RTECountrywide we tackle a pressing question affecting rural affairs/farming/environment.

For mischief I’ve started asking newest #AI models the same question. All consistently really really badly wrong. On facts, orgs, conclusions … everything.

Not hallucinating, just rubbish.

February 18, 2026 at 7:45 PM

Reposted by Greg Linden, Christina Pagel

1%

Scholar power: 1.9%

Story's scientific field profile

Computer science 40%, Political science 25%, Law 20%, Philosophy 15%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Greg Linden	4%	23	1.9%
🎓 Christina Pagel	-	33	-
Total			1.9%

Formula for scholar power: sum of each reposter's field match × √reposter's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

45.0%

17.6 h

165

1.9%

Ranking score

0.015

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Renee DiResta

@noupside.bsky.social

This is a very interesting new paper in Nature about the role that feed algorithms on X play in influencing political attitudes.

No paywall: www.nature.com/articles/s41...

In addition to promoting entertainment, X's feed algorithm tends to push more conservative content to users' feeds. Seven
weeks of exposure to such content in 2023 shifted users' political opinions in a more conservative direction, particularly with regard to policy priorities, perceptions of the criminal investigations into Trump and views on the war in Ukraine. The effect is
asymmetric: switching the algorithm on influenced political views, but switching it off did not reverse users' perspectives on policy
priorities or current political issues.

We show that exposure to algorithmically curated content led users to follow conservative activist accounts. In contrast, when the algorithmic feed was switched off, users continued to follow the accounts they had engaged with previously. This indicates that exposure to feed algorithms has a lasting impact on users' feeds and their political attitudes.

February 18, 2026 at 7:35 PM

by Fareed Zakaria

22%

Scholar power: 22.0%

Story's scientific field profile

Computer science 40%, Political science 25%, Law 20%, Philosophy 15%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Fareed Zakaria	16%	21	22.0%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

54.0%

18.0 h

2

22.0%

Ranking score

0.026

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Add to Home Screen

Light up
your news

Pentagon, Anthropic Clash Over AI

Defense Department and Anthropic Square Off in Dispute Over A.I. Safety

Add to Home Screen

Light upyour news

Pentagon, Anthropic Clash Over AI

Scholar power: 6.3%

Scholar power: 7.2%

Scholar power: 32.7%

Scholar power: 0.5%

Defense Department and Anthropic Square Off in Dispute Over A.I. Safety

Scholar power: 4.6%

Scholar power: 31.6%

Scholar power: 3.4%

Scholar power: 3.4%

Scholar power: 12.0%

Scholar power: 12.0%

Scholar power: 0.0%

Scholar power: 3.4%

Scholar power: 5.1%

Scholar power: 0.0%

Scholar power: 64.7%

Scholar power: 6.7%

Scholar power: 4%

Scholar power: 1.9%

Scholar power: 22.0%

Sign in to Lightnews

Sign up to start reading

Connect Bluesky

Connect with Bluesky

Light up
your news