White House rescinds endangerment finding
4h
The White House announced it would repeal on Thursday the 2009 "endangerment finding" that underpinned U.S. greenhouse-gas regulations, removing the legal basis for CO2 limits.
by Paul Dorfman
Trump to repeal Obama-era finding foundational to US #climate rules
Climate groups vow to fight rollback of 2009 finding determining CO2 and other greenhouse gases harm health
www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026...
Trump to repeal Obama-era finding foundational to US #climate rules
Climate groups vow to fight rollback of 2009 finding determining CO2 and other greenhouse gases harm health
www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026...
by Paul Dorfman
www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026...
www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026...
Our new research, funded by the @zcralliance.bsky.social, shows that 75% of adaptation‑relevant laws and policies have been adopted since the Paris Agreement in 2015, and almost half since 2020.
Reposted by Jussi T. Eronen
Our new research, funded by the @zcralliance.bsky.social, shows that 75% of adaptation‑relevant laws and policies have been adopted since the Paris Agreement in 2015, and almost half since 2020.
Our new research, funded by the @zcralliance.bsky.social, shows that 75% of adaptation‑relevant laws and policies have been adopted since the Paris Agreement in 2015, and almost half since 2020.
by Markus W. Gehring Reposted by Stacy D. VanDeveer
www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026...
www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026...
Reposted by Jussi T. Eronen, Fabián Muniesa
And Brussels is listening.
And Brussels is listening.
Explore our Annual Report: https://ow.ly/rCsR50YcFf5
Explore our Annual Report: https://ow.ly/rCsR50YcFf5
Climate Change Is Erased From a Manual for Federal Judges www.nytimes.com/2026/02/10/c...
Climate Change Is Erased From a Manual for Federal Judges www.nytimes.com/2026/02/10/c...
Really? A U.S. District Court in January tossed the DOE’s fake-science report meant to support the endangerment repeal.
Really? A U.S. District Court in January tossed the DOE’s fake-science report meant to support the endangerment repeal.
Really? You have evidence, or is this just empty ideological bluster?
Really? You have evidence, or is this just empty ideological bluster?
Wrong. Benefit cost analyses regularly show the benefits of reducing GHGs vastly outweigh the costs.
Wrong. Benefit cost analyses regularly show the benefits of reducing GHGs vastly outweigh the costs.
No, the Bush-era EPA decided *not* to regulate greenhouse gases, was sued, and lost in the Supreme Court.
No, the Bush-era EPA decided *not* to regulate greenhouse gases, was sued, and lost in the Supreme Court.