Wicky
vigeo93.bsky.social
Wicky
@vigeo93.bsky.social
Been here, there, done this and that. Don’t want to be doing this Resistance again but will do it to the end of this anti-democratic movement. Stand up.
Reposted by Wicky
December 1, 2025 at 3:30 AM
Reposted by Wicky
🤬🤬🤬🤬
December 1, 2025 at 3:30 AM
Reposted by Wicky
🤬🤬🤬
December 1, 2025 at 3:30 AM
Reposted by Wicky
It’s another week where there is too much going on to keep track of. Here’s the background you need to stay on top of it!
open.substack.com/pub/joycevan...
The Week Ahead
November 30, 2025
open.substack.com
December 1, 2025 at 3:21 AM
Reposted by Wicky
It dovetailed with the freakout over the unlawful orders video, but also it is just qualitatively worse. It's absolutely a crime under all circumstances, even against a real enemy in a real war. And that has deep historical roots as *the* most notorious clear-cut war crime you can commit at sea.
Does anyone have a robust theory as to why the recent reporting on follow on strikes has galvanized this response and not you know the murders they were in the first order?
Note that both of the joint Republican-Democrat Statements from the Senate and House Armed Services Committees refer to the 'Department of Defense' - not the 'Department of War' - in their statements promising oversight of Pete Hegseth's actions.
December 1, 2025 at 12:29 AM
Reposted by Wicky
And it goes on.

The man is completely unraveling.

Bombing boats, threatening invasions “to stop drugs,” and now promising a full pardon to a president convicted of trafficking 400 tons of cocaine into the U.S.

This isn’t law and order.

It’s the most lawless presidency in American history.👇
December 1, 2025 at 2:48 AM
Reposted by Wicky
Lemme see if I can remember from the Biden years what we're supposed to say. Oh yeah: "Watching him sundowning like this, it's clear it's time for him to lay down his burden and get the rest he deserves. How cruel of the people around him to force him to stay in office—it's inhumane." How'd I do?
December 1, 2025 at 2:48 AM
Reposted by Wicky
Translation: Pete may well go down for this. But I’m not going with him.
Reporter: If there were a second strike that killed wounded people, would that be legal?

Trump: I don’t know that happened and Pete said he did not even know what people were talking about. I wouldn’t have wanted a second strike. The first strike was very lethal. It was fine.
November 30, 2025 at 11:21 PM
Reposted by Wicky
Credit to @nickturse.bsky.social of @theintercept.com who in September broke the ordered killing of drone strike survivors story.

1/

theintercept.com/2025/09/10/u...
U.S. Attacked Boat Near Venezuela Multiple Times to Kill Survivors
American officials said the repeat drone strikes were carried out by Special Operations Command, and more attacks could come soon.
theintercept.com
December 1, 2025 at 2:35 AM
Reposted by Wicky
Let me translate from Fox Male Small Dick to English: Pete Hegseth admitted to blowing human beings into pieces who posed no threat. Yes, that’s what our cut-rate, frat-rat, dumb-bro Christian Nationalist masquerading as a serious person did.
Pete Hegseth Confessed to a War Crime — And America Shrugs
From Nuremberg to Trumpworld, Cliff Schecter dismantles the toxic normalization of atrocity — and demands the accountability our heroes fought for.
www.blueamp.co
November 30, 2025 at 3:26 PM
Reposted by Wicky
The AP didn’t used to be known for saucy headlines, but that whole Gulf of Mexico thing must have unleashed their AhFuckIt gene.

apnews.com/article/dona...
December 1, 2025 at 1:36 AM
Reposted by Wicky
GET OUT THERE TOMORROW TENNESSEE AND VOTE FOR AFTYN BEHN ⁦‪@aftynbehn.bsky.social
December 1, 2025 at 2:49 AM
Reposted by Wicky
But..but..PP keeps saying “Canada is broken!” 🙄
December 1, 2025 at 2:41 AM
Reposted by Wicky
I'd be looking for some permanent respite TBH! 🤪
December 1, 2025 at 1:57 AM
Reposted by Wicky
The consistency of his disdain for females with any intelligence is pretty impressive, to be honest.
December 1, 2025 at 2:36 AM
Reposted by Wicky
He looks like he's not quite sure where he is, or what he'a doing. I call it "lost eyes" when I see it, not sure if there's an actual medical
term for it, but every dementia patient I've ever worked with has that look with increasing frequency as the disease progresses.
December 1, 2025 at 2:36 AM
Reposted by Wicky
25th amendment!
December 1, 2025 at 2:38 AM
Reposted by Wicky
Walz got the reaction he wanted! Score!
December 1, 2025 at 2:15 AM
Reposted by Wicky
Not to put too fine a point on this but if you take a cognitive awareness test, but you think it's an IQ test, you have failed both the cognitive awareness test and a IQ test .... just saying
December 1, 2025 at 2:44 AM
Reposted by Wicky
And Walz is 💯 correct ✅.

Trump IS no 👎 family man.

Trump IS mentally ill, and he should not be allowed in public office. He is NOT 👎 fit for office.

Trump SHOULD be getting treatment, as Walz was saying.

And Walz felt bad for Trump.

THAT shows you how much character Walz has.
December 1, 2025 at 2:17 AM
Reposted by Wicky
I listened to Walz’s interview this morning.

I REALLY WISH 🙏 Walz was working for us in the White House right now.

Walz was saying how sad 😔 he felt that at midnight 🕛, when Trump SHOULD have been spending time with his family, Trump was going off on his social media tirades 🤬.
December 1, 2025 at 2:14 AM
Reposted by Wicky
If this were your dad, you’d be texting the siblings: “We need to talk.”
December 1, 2025 at 1:53 AM
Reposted by Wicky
“Son-in-law” is not a government job. Kushner does not represent us

How is this legal?
Threads.
December 1, 2025 at 2:50 AM
Reposted by Wicky
Chief Bovino is not a political appointee. He is a civil servant, subject to the same requirements to be nonpartisan as any other employee. These messages are being broadcast from an official government account.
December 1, 2025 at 2:22 AM
Reposted by Wicky
This wasn't an "eh, this feels iffy" kind of thing where officers up the chain merely discuss the legalities. This is the kind of unlawful order where everyone down to the lowest enlisted has an absolute on-the-spot duty to say "hell no, I won't do that" because it's manifestly, facially criminal.
December 1, 2025 at 12:38 AM