Like, if you take it in a vacuum it makes it look like an official statement but in context it is very clearly not

Just like we were going to be on Mars by [checks notes] New Years 2026.

Stop just breathlessly reporting their every utterance uncritically and unanalyzed.

You don’t have to print something just because he says it

Oh, I love it when an episode of Black Mirror comes true. Cool cool cool 😳

(Only it won't work and 'grandma' will occasionally hallucinate mad internet bullshit about your family)

imagine going through a rough patch financially and u have to cancel your subscription to your mum

Tech’s #1 push my entire life has been monetization via ad algorithms. My older millennial ass is already teaching my toddlers how evil ads are, I assume many people are as angry with the bonkers amount of ad intrusion in our lives. Hoping the all in on evil proves to be too much for enough folks.

Klein and Thompson rightly recognize the overly litigious legal system is part of the problem. But it should be front and center. The path forward isn’t deregulation; it’s legal reform. Who can sue. Where disputes are heard. What happens when plaintiffs lose. Who can afford legal representation.

When environmental groups do sue, they target ecosystems, water, and climate—not urban housing. The Sierra Club fights groundwater extraction. The Center for Biological Diversity protects endangered species. They’re almost never in court over apartment buildings or affordable housing.

The UK is arresting supporters of Palestine Action, and those protesting the ban on it

Anyway if some Aus govt with an inordinate fondness for getting walloped by the High Court does ban pro-Palestine marches, what about marches against banning pro-Palestine marches?