For media, that means they had to actually read the book, watch the movie or show, listen to the song/album, play the game, etc.
And the same rule applies to myself, too, obviously.
For media, that means they had to actually read the book, watch the movie or show, listen to the song/album, play the game, etc.
And the same rule applies to myself, too, obviously.
But shit like ChatGPT that's trained on the entire internet is just too bloated and inefficient to sustain. There is no path to profitability as it currently exists.
too many people like using them and they already have some genuinely useful applications (coding)
but I do think OpenAI specifically, and many startups built on top of these APIs, should be worried
But shit like ChatGPT that's trained on the entire internet is just too bloated and inefficient to sustain. There is no path to profitability as it currently exists.
so it’s very important that the next standard bearer believes that error was “not going hard enough on Trump” rather than “centrism was failed”
There's SO much inertia in favor of "ignore it and hope it goes away"
so it’s very important that the next standard bearer believes that error was “not going hard enough on Trump” rather than “centrism was failed”
I think this explains the massive disconnect we see in how CEOs talk about AI versus everyone else. It also raises the question of how useful it truly is for frontline work?
Rean: [desperately pretending not to hear]
hey randy hows it going
Rean: [desperately pretending not to hear]
hey randy hows it going