tihsllubsi.bsky.social
@tihsllubsi.bsky.social
Reposted
This is making my point for me. I post about economic reporting and platform engagement, and the response is to accuse me of being fine with child porn. This is exactly the kind of engagement that makes reporters not want to spend time here.
So the child porn isn’t disqualifying for you…
This is a good example of why I find Bluesky exhausting and not worth cross posting. You could write a piece that carefully lays out the evidence, and the first (and 2nd-4th) replies are Big Mad that you didn't just write the piece they wanted. X has its problems — many, many problems — but ...
February 18, 2026 at 2:15 PM
Reposted
You’re not arguing with what I said. You’re trying to make it morally impossible for me to use a platform where the audience is bigger.
February 18, 2026 at 2:15 PM
Reposted
Bluesky is markedly less toxic than Twitter but infinitely more boring.
February 15, 2026 at 9:47 PM
Reposted
Yikes. When did BLUESKY become more toxic than Threads or X? I have never seen so many nasty, insulting posts from all political parties and from all countries.

As a Father, I am disappointed in all of you. You’re all grounded.
February 16, 2026 at 1:44 PM
Reposted
Oh, fuck it. I've only been on bluesky 2 months and I remember now why twitter was so bad for my mental health. I shouldn't be here. This place is also toxic to my well being.
February 16, 2026 at 10:48 PM
Reposted
Logged in to Bluesky to confirm it’s still a ghost town of hypocrites paying X for blue checks while shading it. Newsflash: Your app sucks—bad UI, worse community, and zero vibes. Deleting soon, but first: Fuck you for joking about child exploitation. Survivors see you, assholes.
January 20, 2026 at 8:58 PM
Reposted
Oh look.
#Bluesky users are becoming toxic, just like X & META

I was just looking for a frog costume. 🤷‍♂️
October 11, 2025 at 1:35 AM
Reposted
bluesky users are mad at ghost because they didnt put a tw for their new song and. sigh. hot take ppl are too entitled about trigger warnings sometimes
February 18, 2026 at 4:14 PM
Reposted
Wtf is up with bluesky users blocking you for the most normal alternative opinion. Was blocked because someone said bi women have it worse than men (in terms of being bi specifically. Not because of gender) and I was like actually let's not do oppression Olympics with bisexuality
I semi disagree with this because I know bi men get hate from gay men about their attraction to women. Regardless of gender or sex assigned at birth, bi people have it rough
February 18, 2026 at 8:04 PM
Reposted
"Everyone I disagree with is a Nazi!" and other fun lies BlueSky users tell themselves.
February 18, 2026 at 9:28 PM
Reposted
I get blocking individual accounts, who needs to be engaged with Magas, dicks or bots, but why have SO MANY BlueSky users blocked all replies and quote posts? It seems to miss the whole point of social media.
February 19, 2026 at 6:47 AM
Reposted
fedi sits right in the middle of the crater formed between
the overly racist twitter
and
the overly sensitive bluesky

why? because it's by the people, for the people. self hosted , self moderated , federated.
December 26, 2025 at 12:07 AM
Reposted
People wonder why despite everything people stay on twitter but the way the average Bluesky users act like an easily offended redditor is so fucking much sometimes
December 25, 2025 at 10:15 PM
Reposted
The whole value proposition of Bluesky was that it wasn't going to be as crass, toxic, etc.

And yet ... anytime it's pointed out that the experience here is *legit not-so-good* the responses are some mix of "fine, leave Nazi" (with expletives) or X whataboutism ...
February 17, 2026 at 2:30 PM