taz1.bsky.social
@taz1.bsky.social
How is she not in jail?
November 20, 2025 at 5:01 AM
How is she not in jail?
Reposted by taz1.bsky.social
The Trump administration is planning on chipping away at Congressionally legislated whistleblower protections by updating its policy on accountability, which would “exclude senior employees from legal protections that prohibit U.S. government agencies from retaliating against whistleblowers.”
November 20, 2025 at 4:58 AM
The Trump administration is planning on chipping away at Congressionally legislated whistleblower protections by updating its policy on accountability, which would “exclude senior employees from legal protections that prohibit U.S. government agencies from retaliating against whistleblowers.”
Where did you move to?
November 20, 2025 at 4:59 AM
Where did you move to?
Reposted by taz1.bsky.social
Another wrinkle: the foreperson told the magistrate the grand jury voted on the 2nd indictment.
We now know they didn’t.
The foreperson was probably just confused.
But it does raise a question — would the magistrate have accepted the indictment if she’d known the truth?
We now know they didn’t.
The foreperson was probably just confused.
But it does raise a question — would the magistrate have accepted the indictment if she’d known the truth?
November 20, 2025 at 4:47 AM
Reposted by taz1.bsky.social
This is what I’m talking about.
The magistrate was handed the original 3-count indictment along w/ report stating that 12+ jurors failed to concur “in finding an indictment in this case.”
Nothing indicated that the no bill was only Count 1. The foreperson added notation at magistrate direction.
The magistrate was handed the original 3-count indictment along w/ report stating that 12+ jurors failed to concur “in finding an indictment in this case.”
Nothing indicated that the no bill was only Count 1. The foreperson added notation at magistrate direction.
November 20, 2025 at 4:46 AM
Reposted by taz1.bsky.social
Nazis needed a coalition of parties to pass the Enabling Act because they had been unable to win a supermajority in March on their own; major miscalculation on the part of the Center Party and the German National People's Party, both of which were shut down. 2/
November 20, 2025 at 4:35 AM
Nazis needed a coalition of parties to pass the Enabling Act because they had been unable to win a supermajority in March on their own; major miscalculation on the part of the Center Party and the German National People's Party, both of which were shut down. 2/
There is nothing to underestimate
Pay attention to everything else they are doing.
Pay attention to everything else they are doing.
November 20, 2025 at 4:41 AM
There is nothing to underestimate
Pay attention to everything else they are doing.
Pay attention to everything else they are doing.
Welcome to Project 2025
November 20, 2025 at 4:39 AM
Welcome to Project 2025
Thank you for explaining!
As always very grateful to follow you.
As always very grateful to follow you.
November 20, 2025 at 4:30 AM
Thank you for explaining!
As always very grateful to follow you.
As always very grateful to follow you.
Reposted by taz1.bsky.social
In addition to Smith's dissent, in the Texas redistricting case, Texas filed a motion for a stay pending appeal today at the district court (presumably the step before, after that is denied, they seek a stay from SCOTUS).
storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...
storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...
![Case 3:21-cv-00259-DCG-JES-JVB Document 1440 Filed 11/19/25 Page 1 of 29
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
EL PASO DIVISION
LEAGUE OF UNITED LATIN AMERICAN
CITIZENS, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
§
§
Case No. 3:21-cv-00259-DCG-JES-JVV
[Lead Case]
V.
GREG ABBOTT, et al.,
Defendants.
All Consolidated Cases
STATE DEFENDANTS' OPPOSED MOTION TO STAY PENDING APPEAL](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:36eqtmzysqf7wsslczw4uxcd/bafkreigpohtglmhsk2imbyv6hbvdpl7x7txr5w2ayq5be4tlaansbpbkum@jpeg)
November 20, 2025 at 4:22 AM
In addition to Smith's dissent, in the Texas redistricting case, Texas filed a motion for a stay pending appeal today at the district court (presumably the step before, after that is denied, they seek a stay from SCOTUS).
storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...
storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...
Sorry
It makes zero sense how long Rudy took.
It also made zero sense how much leeway and time the judge gave him against Ruby.
It makes zero sense how long Rudy took.
It also made zero sense how much leeway and time the judge gave him against Ruby.
November 20, 2025 at 4:12 AM
Sorry
It makes zero sense how long Rudy took.
It also made zero sense how much leeway and time the judge gave him against Ruby.
It makes zero sense how long Rudy took.
It also made zero sense how much leeway and time the judge gave him against Ruby.
Which is absurd!
A "year or more"
The licensing of lawyers in this country is just ridiculous.
A "year or more"
The licensing of lawyers in this country is just ridiculous.
November 20, 2025 at 4:07 AM
Which is absurd!
A "year or more"
The licensing of lawyers in this country is just ridiculous.
A "year or more"
The licensing of lawyers in this country is just ridiculous.
No the idiot dems in the house just voted to take away rights of DC.
November 20, 2025 at 3:28 AM
No the idiot dems in the house just voted to take away rights of DC.